Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ErcinaLakeHorse.jpg 1

Self nomination Francisco M. Marzoa 12:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- colors -- YolanC 20:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not extra ordinary Bertilvidet 22:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful, but, few contrast. -- Fernando S. Aldado 23:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd rather see the front of the horse. Pastels would be more saturated in full sun and would contrast with blue sky. Wsiegmund 23:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've others, but I like asses. The weather is the usual in that location at the north of Spain.

Oppose -- Urban 04:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - nice pic, except for being mooned at by the horse. Would have voted for, if the horse was sideways or facing on (or not there at all) - MPF 22:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Without the horse colors, profundity & proportion, and breeze is lost. The picture IS essentially the horse. The composition is a classical rule of thirds from book. Francisco M. Marzoa 12:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 16:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 19:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- skINMATE 10:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Miskatonic 07:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Wow, support support! I can almost feel the breeze. Beautiful palette. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 08:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ - Even if it's not with usual weather conditions (sunlight and so on), I my opinion it is a really nice picture, especially with the silver reflexion on the water ! Not every picture needs the same usual "perfect day" lightning. No-w-ay 17:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Please log in to vote (139.165.204.186). pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC) striking undone - No-w-ay was logged in Roger McLassus 17:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC) I was wrong and pfctdayelise was right - the signature of No-w-ay is a fake. I aplogize and re-insert the striking Roger McLassus 11:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Boereck 16:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -NiceDannycas 03:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pjotr 11:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4 support, 8 oppose, 2 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 18:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]