Oppose I like the composition a lot, but licensing seems not very clear to me. Is the uploader the photographer? Otherwise we need a clear statement of the copyright holder. Forthermore there should be a description about what is shown on this photograph. norro21:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support, good as a photo. If copyright status wont be explained by the uploader, should be deteded. --Wikimol22:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
the photographer has previously stated I see no problem with my photos being used on Wiki pages, would be grateful, as before if the credits say "Photo by Mikhail Evstafiev". when this issue was raised onthe other nominated image Gnangarra06:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the statement isn't appropriate. The copyright holder has to agree to release his works under the terms of a free license not just to have “no problem with [his] photos being used on Wiki pages”. That is not enough. I left the uploader a message. norro08:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support on the condition that the licensing is kosher. (I suspect it will be. He's an artist, not an expert on copyright law, and he had no problem making arrangements with us before.) QuartierLatin196817:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]