Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Eye-diagram no circles border.svg

Image:Eye-diagram.svg edit

Info created by Chabacano - uploaded by Chabacano - nominated by Chabacano --Chabacano 12:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chabacano 12:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WarX 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC) wow[reply]
Support --MesserWoland Dyskusja 13:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching ;) --norro 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome and high quiality svg work. -- Drini 17:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... wow! ...♥♥♥ Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 19:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very good --Thermos 19:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Changed support for new version[reply]
Info I find the multiple circles round the numbers a bit overpowering, and I feel they detract from the image. Suggest simply getting rid of them, and leaving the numbers unadorned (that's standard practice in patent drawings which have to be technically clear). --MichaelMaggs 22:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Seconded. Especially since the numbers are not centered in the circles. ~ trialsanderrors 02:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Uhm. The numbers are centered in the svg. At least I see them centered here and in Inkscape. In the thumbnails they are not rendered accurately, I suppose :( Chabacano 11:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yeah, they're not properly rendered in any size other than the original. Thanks for removing. ~ trialsanderrors 16:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment The problem occurs because you use a different font and size when drawing this on your computer than the mediawiki software when rendering. This problem could be solved by converting the text to path (Inkscpae: “Path” -> “Object to Path”). --norro 12:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Updated: Yes, that solution worked. Nice :) Chabacano 13:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very precision work --Packa 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Atoma 09:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC) changed my support to the new edit --Atoma 13:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 10:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC) changed my support to the new edit--Simonizer 11:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => Waiting for the result of the edit! Simonizer 10:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Border of the circles removed (right), featured edit

Info Borders of the circles removed. The circles, however, are still there. This voting page has white backrgound, but the numbers should be visible with any background (example)
Support --Chabacano 11:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC) The subject gets more attention without those borders.[reply]
Support --Simonizer 11:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ¡Awesome! --Paintman 13:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atoma 13:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Much better now - Alvesgaspar 13:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ziga 13:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arad 15:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support good point --Diligent 15:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original was good, this is even better --Thermos 16:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support pile-on ~ trialsanderrors 16:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agreed. Thanks for making the change. --MichaelMaggs 17:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent work. Jkelly 18:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lestat 09:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. --startaq 13:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ditto to everyone - MPF 23:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though I still have a problem with the numbers in the white circles; however I don't see a solution at the moment. The image itself is very good of course. Lycaon 08:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire 15:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tone 20:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Leafnode 11:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not that this has any chance of failing, but a really exemplary diagram. Brighterorange 20:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wing-Chi 20:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca [re] 15:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 08:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]