Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ferrofluid in magnetic field.jpg

Image:Ferrofluid in magnetic field.jpg, featured edit

Info A superparamagnetic fluid, otherwise known as a ferrofluid, in a dish over a neodymium magnet. Image created by Steve Jurvetson - uploaded by GeeJo - nominated by GeeJo
Support --GeeJo 02:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good example of physic phenomena ! Mutatis mutandis 08:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support- wow that looks stiky and quite educative -LadyofHats 11:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support funky pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support rare! --XN 12:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, although I support all opinions above, encyclopedic value is not an issue here. The quality (and the resolution) of the image are not FP. Lycaon 13:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ... definitely not good enough quality! Adamantios 19:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support The original version. Makes you want to eat it with a spoon. Adamantios 09:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Although the quality is far from perfect, the subject is really interesting.CyrilB 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the second version even more! a bit of cropping could bring the subject in a better position though, but this is not a big issueCyrilB 09:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - so weird - MPF 23:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I kind of like it, but unfortunately the resolution is something like half the guideline for FP. However, perhaps a bigger file can be provided. In addition, I would prefer not to have right side of picture cut off. Also, if some "breathing space" around the subject could be provided, that would be better. And finally, it appears that there are burned highlights, which should be corrected. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Thermos (talk •

Support Much better crop and exposure than the first one uploaded. Informative. Support the new crop and version. --Thermos 14:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 02:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would probably support it with better and not overexposed background. Perhaps one can try to edit this? norro 08:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quick notice, I've just gotten a mail back from the creator of the image, and he still has a higher resolution, uncropped version on his hard drive. I'll post the link when I've received it. GeeJo 21:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, added now. I'm not very good when it comes to manipulating images, so if anyone wants to take a shot at cleaning it up, feel free :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 23:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting to look at and think about Coldfingers 00:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would support it on the Wikipedia but not on Wikimedia Commons. Freedom to share 15:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh?? Jon Harald Søby 19:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Doruk Salancı 11:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oppose both - no scale references in one picture, and the other has little impact. Gordo 11:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 19:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Broc 19:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I thought the overall quality was poor, so I created several new ones... I see someone has nominated one towards the top of this page. --Gmaxwell 04:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support two - YolanC 11:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: version 1 -> 14   Support, 6   Oppose and 0   Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]