Open main menu

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Foggy woods.jpeg

< Commons:Featured picture candidates

Image:Foggy woods.jpeg, not featuredEdit

 

  •   Info created by Freedom to share - uploaded by Freedom to share - nominated by Freedom to share --Freedom to share 22:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   InfoA panoramic image of a foggy forest in Pennsylvania. What you might see as noise is in fact often dense fog comprised of small particles. Taken using an EOS 350D with the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens at f/7.1 and f/8 and at shutter speeds of 1/100 sec and 1/125 sec. Created from three images using Hugin. Freedom to share 22:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Support --Freedom to share 22:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Comment. You should indicate which specific forest it was. Thierry Caro 06:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Misty forests don't tickle my WOW-button. Needs geo-location too. Lycaon 13:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Support Works for me. --startaq 15:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As Lycaon --Karelj 19:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I know that it was beautiful to be there and i can smell the fresh forrest air. A shot like this would be more nicer in the morning when you see sunrays bursting throught the fog (causes fogshadow, too) which would give the picture more deph and a nicer play of colors. I tried this so many times and i always failed   Richard Bartz talk 19:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Technically a very nice image. The stitching is very good (I cannot figure out where they are, which is a good sign). I agree with Richard though and besides that it does not give a sizeable enough reading on my value-o-meter. I hope you enjoyed being in the forest though. -- Slaunger 20:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I really like this, but overall it seems overexposed (not any burnt out areas, just very bright). Some geogoding would be nice too. --Digon3 talk 16:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  •   Support We need such pictures just for illustrating what are actually temperate forests (without exaggerated scenery like sun rays or other esthetic effects) and this one is a very good one . You might be more accurate : what is the exact location, what are the tree species ? --B.navez 04:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  •   Support I think this is really nice :) /Daniel78 21:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  •   Support I think this is a good composition, the fog adds to the effect, and it has enough technical quality and value for me. - Relic38 02:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


result: 5 supports, 4 opposes, 1 neutral => not featured. Acarpentier 16:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)