Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Giraffe08 - melbourne zoo.jpg

Image:Giraffe08 - melbourne zoo.jpg - featured edit

Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
Support --Fir0002 www 22:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is on par with the rest of the animal feature pics – flamurai 06:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Tecnically correct photo of a girafe in a zoo, wouldn't hesitate to promote to quality image. But lacks the magic of this one Image:Pelican lakes entrance02.jpg. Alvesgaspar 08:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar. This is a quality image. Nice and sharp, but obviously a zoo shot. The griafe without any expression. --SvonHalenbach 11:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support What does everyone expect the Giraffe to be expressing? Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 15:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support How on earth is it obvious that this is a zoo shot?? Jon Harald Søby 17:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At least the giraffe can smile a bit. :) --:SvonHalenbach 17:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But only sarcastic smiles, I'm afraid. Alvesgaspar 18:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support I love this picture of a giraffe♥ Yes it is in a zoo, so what? That doesn't make the slightest bit of difference to the quality of the picture (which is another good one from Fir0002)♥ In fact I wouldn't know this picture was taken in a zoo if we weren't told♥--Nilfanion♥21:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Being on a zoo doesn't preclude it being a very good picture, FP quality. MOreover, if it weren't for the filename, htere would be no way to know it was taken on a zoo, that's how good it is -- Drini 19:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose obvious zoo shot Lycaon 20:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what? What does being taken in a zoo have to do with anything?--Nilfanion 20:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not zoo but obvious is the key word. Lycaon 21:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First question why is it obviously a zoo pic? Second does it make a blind bit of difference, its not like the giraffe is obscured by bars or something...--Nilfanion 21:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support K!roman | ☺‼↑♫♥☻ 21:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar.--MichaelMaggs 10:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dori | Talk 20:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lacen 07:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ansett 12:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Lycaon --Luc Viatour 15:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Vmenkov 10:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think a zoo shot precludes it from being FP. This picture is nice. --Wing-Chi 21:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 12 support, 1 neutral, 5 oppose >> featured Alvesgaspar 08:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]