Info this is the front view of a female skeleton. i will also nominate the back view, even when i like to see the both images as one. the svg file of both convined would be too big. One of the main advantages of this diagrams is that each bone is done independently. --LadyofHats15:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question and Comment The terms used seems to be a mixture of Latin and English. Why not use an English only or Latin only terminology or make a version for each of the two languages. See also my elaborated comment for the back view above. Oh, and by the way, is there a point in using different colours (blue or red) for the lines that point out the bones in the skeleton? There may be an obvious explanation, but apparently I am not smart enough to figure it out, and the image page does not help me. -- Slaunger21:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
red is for single bones and therefor singular names. blue stands for groups of bones, like by example the skull wich is a name for a group of bones. As for weather the names languages and wich names where used, well i believe that comes from my sources. if well all of them seem to be mixed in someway. the printed reference i have is in german/latin, my online references are mustly english/latin. where i must notice that there is not an agreement in wich terms should apear, while some make mention of things like eye sokets, false ribs, 1st and 12 rib, Angulus arcus pubis, and even every skull bone mention independently. i desided to reach a middle point in wich i mention the bones or main bone groups with more often apearing name for them. if you would have a look on the english wikipedia you would realise they have the same problem when talking about the human skeleton. this is also why i didnt made a numbered version but instead uploaded a version without labels. so that eachone could edit the file to adapt it to their actual needs-LadyofHats21:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply to my lengthy comments and questions. In any case I suggest you add the colour legend explanation to the image page description as it helps understanding what is going on. I also understand that the mixed-language terminology is due to mixed sources. Considering that FP is for the-best-of-the-best (and the illustration in itself is of very high technical quality IMO), it would be really nice if an anatomy-proficient person could help correct/double-check the terms for consistency. -- Slaunger22:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info- i was out for the weekend and couldnt do this before, but here it is. i removed the cartilage and extended the rips lines, even when i am not really happy with it crossing the other lines , it now points the first and the last rip -LadyofHats10:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]