One can see each and every hair around tiger's mouth as well as many separate hairs inside the tiger's ears. Is it what you call "out of focus"? This is a rhetorical question. No reply is needed.-- Mbz122:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Oppose - Yes, we can see the hair inside the tiger's ears but they are indeed out of focus, as well as the whole animal. Alvesgaspar01:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tiger's hunting posture is greatly captured. I think we could accept how the mouth is focused -it might be starting a movement when captured, but as Alvesgaspar pointed, even the ear hairs are out of focus. Besides, the crop above its back is too tight while there is a wide background at its sides. Great photo, not FP --Javier ME08:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe you are right. Now I do see that the hairs in the tiger's ears are out of focus. Sorry I took your time.Mbz114:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Quality is still too low and like Mbz1 would say: i can see No VALUE in this picture cause there are allready better tiger pictures available at wikimedia (second part of comment is meant to be ironical) --Simonizer13:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]