Comment Okay, tell me which tilt exactly you meen - to help me. I fixed a much stronger tilt and now all results of further correction seem to make it worse to me. I spent a lot of time to correct the top but it seams as if the top wasn't symmetric at all. Give me some hint to correct that --JuliusR08:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I ivestigated it and I think you can't fix it. Because it not tilt, everything on the horizontal lines - the problem is perspectivic. You didn't shoting perfectly in front of window. Otherwise it's a good picture. --Beyond silence10:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've tried to play around in Photoshop a bit, with this result, but i'm not sure if it's actually been improved so i'm not putting it up for voting. --Aqwis10:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support If the slight tilt can be fixed, I'd prefer that, but it's still a really good example of a stained glass window. -- Ram-Man14:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I honestly can't see the tilt, and the details of the window are really good, I think it's more than enough for FP. --Nattfodd15:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I suppose the tilt is corrected, as I don't see any tilt. This is just an excellent picture of a stained-glass window, which is very difficult to photograph in a correct way. -- MJJR20:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Ok, thanks for all the assistance. I think you are right, it is the perspectivity. I couldn't stand in the needed height. But I liked the clear colors and tried my best. To tell the truth I like my version with the broader black frame better. Perhaps I'll get a second chance to take a better one. --JuliusR20:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good image… Photographic technique is good enough to the point where it can convey the beauty of the subject itself, which is, after all, the important thing. The real object of critique here, for me, is not whether the image is a pixel off or tilted a degree or so, too much dark around, etc., but the object itself, its value, and the recognition of the people who created it, not necessarily the skill of the photographer, which in this case is good enough. The photograph in this instance, is just a medium, a window between the viewer and the landscape. Any experienced photographer knows that the best conditions for a great picture are almost never there, so one must shoot to get the best possible under existing conditions. Shooting inside churches is shooting in a down to up direction most of the time, and convengence or tilt down is almost always there. Congratulations!--Tomascastelazo16:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have to thank all of you. It is a great community we are a part of. I'm quite fascinated by the comment of Tomascastelazo. You made me think about the way I judge pictures. That's great. A good motivation to go out and create more little pieces of art with my camera. --JuliusR12:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]