original version (left) - not featured
edit
Oppose The colour of the clouds and the bolts of lightning are great but let down by the messy foreground. Snowwayout 23:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - I think that the foreground is not disturbing, and that colors are normal for lightning pics. IMHO the shot is very good. ♦ Pabix ℹ 07:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Lack of sharpness and tilted. Francisco M. Marzoa 11:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Really nice picture! Moralist 17:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - ditto to Snowwayout - MPF 10:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support But not to the cropped version. Cary "Bastiq▼ e" Bass demandez 20:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support the uncropped version makes the lightnings look more impressive --SimONE 12:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Spoken 23:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Romary 21:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Lycaon 08:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support , should be slighty rotated, but not cropped. Dake 17:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Confusing foreground, not a good composition -- Alvesgaspar 21:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
7 support, 5 oppose → not featured Roger McLassus 08:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
edited version (right) - not featured
edit
Comment How about the cropped version? Roger McLassus 14:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support cropped version K! roman | ☺‼ ↑ ♫♥☻ 07:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose although the cropped version looks better, it is even more disturbing that the picture is tilted -- eboy 13:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Same problems than original version plus I disagree with eboy, this looks worse for me, perhaps by the square format. Francisco M. Marzoa 16:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose ditto to Francisco, the messy foreground extends to those ugly pylons, and cropping them would leave very little of the pic. - MPF 10:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Spoken 23:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
2 support, 3 oppose → not featured Roger McLassus 08:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]