Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Jan 2006.jpg

Image:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Jan 2006.jpg, featured edit

Nominate

— Who said "not sharp" ?? Please view full :) - Fabien1309 13:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Fabien1309 13:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 14:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- No-w-ay 16:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC) invalid vote (fake-signature) Kessa Ligerro 21:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Calderwood 16:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - nearly 5 megabytes is overdoing it. I don't have a two-metre-wide screen. - MPF 16:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... but if you want to print it as a poster, you'll need such a resolution -- Fabien1309 17:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... I'd not want that as a poster, cityscapes bore me . . . so I guess that counts as an oppose anyway! - MPF 21:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --AFBorchert 18:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC) I'm impressed! (And even if I don't have a 2m-wide screen, I like to scroll through the panorama.)[reply]
Support-- Urban 18:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Rex 21:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 02:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support - the weather conditions are not perfect in that the buildings do not contrast well to the sky in the background. But still pretty good. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 06:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joonasl 07:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK MPF. It is really sharp, but that's not everything an excellent picture needs. --SehLax 21:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - technically high quality work, but I just think the light's too flat to do it justice Rodge500 22:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support fantastic -Quasipalm 22:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tbc 15:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lighting is quite bad (half of it is shadow) + composition is not that special; technically extremely well done though -- Gorgo 20:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support - Bloddy amazing. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 00:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Lycaon 02:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Briseis 11:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --che 20:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 01:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 08:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support what a picture. never seen such a big one of new york. Metoc 18:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Results: 16   Support, 1   Neutral and 5   Oppose => featured Kessa Ligerro 21:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]