Original, featured
edit
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Chmehl -- Chmehl (talk ) 15:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support A Three-toed-sloth in the rather dark jungle of Costa Rica. -- Chmehl (talk ) 15:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support I feel lighting could have helped you a little bit more (background is a bit bright compared to main subject), but it still looks good. -- Benh (talk ) 21:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Econt (talk ) 19:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Nice sharpness on the hand. Cirt (talk ) 19:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Ack Benh - Keta (talk ) 10:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Karelj (talk ) 14:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --libertad0 ॐ (talk ) 20:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose , out of focus. Канопус Киля (talk ) 09:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Lycaon (talk ) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose dont like the background --Simonizer (talk ) 18:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk ) 08:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
edited version, not featured
edit
I think the edited version has a bit better details in the shadows but less contrast, so I am not withdrawing the original version. I still prefer the original. Thanks for your effort Leo. -- Chmehl (talk ) 05:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
No problem :-). I am not used to Commons, I didn't really know how to present the edited version (what I should do). Leo Johannes (talk ) 08:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer (talk ) 13:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
edit 2, not featured
edit
Info by Lycaon (talk ) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Lycaon (talk ) 10:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support I think this edit is superior to my original. Let's see if it gets more support votes than the original. Thanks for the editing by the way! Chmehl (talk ) 20:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Agree with Chmehl --S23678 (talk ) 00:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose same as above --Simonizer (talk ) 08:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support It is better. Barabas (talk ) 00:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment I took the liberty to move this candidate to the top to get more opinions on the edit. Crapload (talk ) 16:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support prefer this edit -- Klaus with K (talk ) 19:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Aqwis (talk ) 11:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Surprisingly better ! some strange artifacts on dark areas, but minor issues -- Benh (talk ) 19:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (other version has more support votes) Simonizer (talk ) 09:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]