Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Messier51 sRGB.jpg

Image:Messier51 sRGB.jpg, (sRGB version) - featured edit

Info created by NASA and European Space Agency - nominated by Laitche -- Laitche 13:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 13:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nevit Dilmen 14:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very nice... --Dsmurat 14:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 16:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 17:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - We look at these things with awe and still cannot image their real size and complexity! -- Alvesgaspar 18:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think there is life out there --Richard Bartz 23:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Of course there is, or there was or there will be. The problem to communicate with "them" is the crawling speed of light and the short span of our civilizations! -- Alvesgaspar 23:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is an interesting theory against advanced life out there. If a civilization advances far enough thay could build replicating robot ships that could build replicas of them selfes and expand further and further out to visit new worlds. Why have we not seen them ? (they would of course outlive their creators civilization) Nevertheless I still think there is life out here :) /Daniel78 22:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But they are everywhere, what about the UFO's ? ;-) -- Alvesgaspar 11:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, yes I forgot about those :) /Daniel78 21:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see creature on the upper right of this picture:) --D kuba 17:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 8952px version has been uploaded. -- Laitche 12:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice image -- Gorgo 13:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support the god who created it did a good job... --Mbdortmund 14:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Mbdortmund (talk · contribs). Cirt 05:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 05:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one, not the other one below :) --Leafnode 12:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great picture! --Thamusemeantfan 00:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

14 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 17:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Messier51.jpg, Alternative - not featured edit

Comment Adobe RGB(1998) version. -- Laitche 12:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I actually like the srgb one better, because for some strange reason the thumbnail looks way better/sharper -- Gorgo 13:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Only firefox 3 beta can display Adobe RGB (1998) correctly in firefox 2.x and Internet explorer it appears under saturated as they cannot display the full gamut of colors. Movieevery 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment or Safari on a Mac :) Either way it's bad practice to be putting AdobeRGB images on a majority web media based project. In the end though this image won't really benefit from the extended AdobeRGB gamut anyway, looking at the balance of its palette. Mfield 02:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

0 support, 0 oppose >> not featured (rule of the 5th day) -- Alvesgaspar 11:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]