Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mittlist Gfaell 02 edit.jpg

Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Simonizer 20:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Another FP try! Maybe a bit dark but in my opinion that emphasizes the romantic mood --Simonizer 20:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC) changed to neutral --Simonizer 19:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like it too, but you should have given a bit more of the frame to the sky and the sun rays in my opinion. here it looks more like a missed shot which fortunately has rays on it -- Benh 20:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark. --Beyond silence 22:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Like Simonizer and AngMoKio I put much value on the artistic side, specially the composition. The arrangement of the elements and the atmosphere in this photo make it quite beautiful. However I agree with Benh that more sky is needed. Also, I would increase the contrast a little bit by brightening the brighter parts so that the colours are emphasized. - Alvesgaspar 23:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is bad; it is too dark. Plus I agree with that if photograph had a larger part of the sky it would add a lot to the atmosphere... - Noumenon _talk 10:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As Alvesgaspar. --Digon3 ^talk 18:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 21:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info - I added a slightly improved version. But I'm a clumsy editor, maybe the author can do it better - Alvesgaspar 11:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Alvesgaspar 11:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 12:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice...--Christoph Michels 13:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose my comment for the first nomination still applies here. Benh 10:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 21:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mihael Simonic 10:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The clouds are loosing some contrast in this version. Iam still trying to make an edit that is brighter, but without loosing contrast in the clouds. I will post it if iam successfull --Simonizer 19:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC) changed to neutral --Simonizer 19:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Beyond silence 03:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It has some technical flaws, but I really like the composition. (I definitely disagree with Benh here.)--Ragesoss 03:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => featured. (Waiting for result of edit 2) Simonizer 06:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info - I have done an edit by myself. Brighter, but with remaining contrast in the clouds, a bit more sky, and I changed the crop a bit cause of the rule of thirds. I hope its not too late --Simonizer 19:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 19:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral This is the version I much prefer, because of the details in the clouds. Still a very nice mood, but still not enough for me because of the lighting... I think this is the kind of picture HDR could improve a lot (as discussed above). Benh 21:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, the clouds are much better but the greens need more light. Alvesgaspar 23:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree; the midground where the light hits the hills looks better brightened, as in the first edit.--Ragesoss 00:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Middle version is better. --Mihael Simonic 09:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Malene Thyssen 18:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 18:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]