Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Morocco Africa Flickr Rosino December 2005 84514010.jpg

Image:Morocco Africa Flickr Rosino December 2005 84514010.jpg, Featured edit

edited version

Nomination. A scene from Morocco -Quasipalm 16:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Quasipalm 16:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC) (I uploaded, but did not take this image)[reply]
Support --Tq 16:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nothing really special, seen in every tour operator leaflet. villy ♦✎ 17:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 17:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the edited version (because I don't watch tour operator leaflets ;-)) --SehLax 17:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this version, Support edited version. Beautiful, good quality norro 18:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC) PS: Edited version[reply]
Oppose -- Tatoute 19:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support tour operators can have good pictures too --che 19:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

is it the horizon in the background??? - because it seems to be leaning extremely --Buchling 19:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- YolanC 22:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Holy crap, that's perfect. pfctdayelise (translate?) 23:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I always loved tour operator leaflets !! -- Fabien1309 00:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Nothing special? How could an image of a sand dune get any more awsome? —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 02:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The horizon is sloping too much for my taste LoopZilla 11:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Morocco_Africa_Flickr_Rosino_December_2005_84514010_edited_by_Buchling.jpg- I just tried to correct it. --Buchling 12:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are correcting the tilt - thanks! LoopZilla 08:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - amazingly, pristine, with not a single human footprint to be seen! Though yes, it is tilted; it could benefit from being rotated 6° clockwise - MPF 11:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the corrected version Calderwood 22:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Jossifresco 23:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the improved one Mayamaxima 08:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm neither the holy crap nor the nothing special camp - but I have to say it's quite good. Just enough for FP, maybe. The only minus is the overall composition, I would have liked to see more of the dune. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 08:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --— Erin (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kessa Ligerro 19:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support David.Monniaux 10:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Lycaon 13:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support improved version. —MRB 18:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Get_It (Talk) 01:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

21 Support, 4 oppose => Featured--Shizhao 08:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
corr: 22 support, 4 oppose --> Featured Roger McLassus 22:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]