Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mullerthal.jpg

Image:Mullerthal.jpg, Featured

Nominate

Self nomination --Vdegroot 19:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Vdegroot 19:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- YolanC 19:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Get_It (Talk) 23:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- very cute. Husky 00:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely. pfctdayelise 00:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 01:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JeremyA 01:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thryduulf 02:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support QuartierLatin1968 04:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp / CA's Darkone 14:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Gloumouth1 23:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MPF 00:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ceridwen 15:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like the atmosphere --Buchling 17:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - when a picture makes me want to go there in person, that's a good thing --Bachrach44 19:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - One third on the right and one third of the top is boring = the scene could be cut near the rock on the side and in a certain distance over the bridge. This would also reduce the overall greenish impression. Longer exposure would be nicer. Andreas Tille 06:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Comment): disagree - cropping the top and right off would cut the bridge, and a longer exposure would spoil the appearance of the water - MPF 13:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nature can be beautiful, but I don't think that this picture catches beauty. -CSamulili 22:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

13 Support, 4 oppose => Featured--Shizhao 01:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]