Can't you write a short English description? Thanks --Beyond silence 11:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support DocteurCosmos 12:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Good lighting and excellent sharpness. Freedom to share 16:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support I find this picture beautiful, it has a good quality and I feel it's informative. Benh 20:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support good picture. --Pinpin 21:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - Good detail on the walnut but poor composition and framing. Some noise in the background. Alvesgaspar 22:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose I dislike the composition and the blown reflection of the walnut fruit in the BG. Not enough wow IMO. -- Slaunger 05:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Reflections make the two nut husks look as if they are fused. (Tilted?) background is disturbing. Wow is lacking. Lycaon 09:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Nice composition Gordo 09:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Blown reflection of the walnut fruit and tilt. --Di go n3 talk 13:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose nothing special --Karelj 22:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Composition and lighting, including blown highlights, not up to FP standards I think --MichaelMaggs 16:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Harsh lighing making overexposed and underexposed spots, no wow --Leafnode 07:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose unfortunately I just don't find any viewer impact in this picture --Ben hello! 12:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 6 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Ben chat 05:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]