Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pahoeoe fountain original.jpg

Image:Pahoeoe fountain original.jpg - not featured edit

Info created by USGS - uploaded by Saperaud - nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 18:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mbz1 18:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A few dust spots and a scratch from scanning is visible in the middle of the image. Removing should be easy. Otherwise a really impressing picture. --Chmehl 18:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too noisy and scratched. One must shoot a much better picture for featuring. --B.navez 18:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this original better. /Daniel78 10:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting edit2 instead /Daniel78 14:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 support, 1 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 08:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pahoeoe fountain original-edit11.jpg - not featured edit

I've remvoed the scratch. I'm not sure about dust. They might be very small lava rocks.--Mbz1 19:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Mbz1 19:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 21:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC) s.edit2[reply]
Comment Please link all edits/versions with each other. It's so often forgotten. /Daniel78 23:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you.--Mbz1 01:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support FRZ 01:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Liking the clear, stark colors. Cirt 02:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Urban 04:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have seen much finer pictures of lava fountains, but unhappily with no free license. So I support for the catching of the phenomenon which is very impressive.--B.navez 04:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The wow compensates for the missing sharpness. --Chmehl 06:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support a phenomenally composed image IMHO. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just because I think the original version looks better, this seems oversharpened (for lack of better words to describe it), it's very visible on the thumbnails. Maybe it's just me :), anyway I support the original instead. /Daniel78 10:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know what you mean, but I'd like to mention that the above edit was not sharpened at all. I only made it a little bit darker. Thank you.--Mbz1 13:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose By the help of this edit it is unrealistic now. --Manco Capac 11:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate edit of his spectacular image. Lycaon 23:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Manco Capac. --MichaelMaggs 05:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI wonder how you can find one more or less realistic and what are your references do decide, supposing you are used to watching eruptions. I find the original a bit pink. Just for our pleasures some great pictures here. --B.navez 08:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, B.navez, for the link and for the comment. Beautiful images!--Mbz1 13:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7 support, 4 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pahoeoe fountain edit2.jpg - featured edit

Comment I kept the original colors in this edit. Only removed scratches. Thanks.--Mbz1 12:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 12:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 20:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better, thanks. /Daniel78 14:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I liked Image:Pahoeoe fountain original-edit11.jpg, but this one is great as well. Cirt 18:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok for this one too --B.navez 23:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Naerii (talk• contribs)
Support --Böhringer 22:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 21:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rohan 13:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

9 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 20:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]