Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Papilio machaon caterpillar.jpg

Image:Papilio machaon caterpillar.jpg, featured

Info uploaded and nominated by Slovik 07:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slovik 07:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Huebi 07:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too low depth of field. Otherwise it's fantastic norro 09:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tbc 13:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- fun picture, but way too fuzzy! -- Boereck 13:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose focus --Artefacto 19:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Good picture, low depth of field brings out the attention of subject, otherwise, it would be a confusing pic. User:Tomascastelazo 15:00 PST, June 4, 2006
Comment great picture, except for focus. (Low DOF alone wouldn't be such problem if the focus was on head, and not "somewhere".) Maybe... the head is not so unsharp, wouldn't it be possible to make it sharper by seective application of unsharp mask? --Wikimol 21:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support FML ^hi 02:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joonasl 09:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral a perfect picture if only the focus would be on the head of this thing. Angle and colours are very good--AngMoKio 09:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Wikimol --Luc Viatour 11:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Gérard Janot 12:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the tunnel effect pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- gildemax 13:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Urban 15:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Excellent photo thanks to focus. El Comandante Hasta ∞ 17:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I like it. Ziga 22:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Beautiful colors! (that's nature for you :) ) FiP 10:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Ggonnell 00:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support and thanks to Mother Nature for not making these creatures man-sized. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 02:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support; alhough focus is not that great, the subject compensates it --che 23:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors. --romanm (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ßøuñçê Y2K 13:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Konstable 08:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with norro. Very, very nice, but depth of field...--Jodelet 10:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 14:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

results 19 Support, 2 Neutral, 7 Oppose Slovik 10:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC). It's over when it's over. Nominators can only withdraw their nomination before the end of voting. Do you want to withdraw it? --Mglanznig 09:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 19   Support, 7   Oppose and 2   Neutral => featured. --Lycaon 07:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]