Info This is a view of Paris, from the Montparnasse Tower. Once the tallest in Europe, that tower is considered a failure in its integration in the parisian skyline. I think (to be verified) that it is why building skyscrapers are currently not permitted in Paris, and why the CBD is in La Défense. Benh20:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I chose to get that curved horizon to simulate Paris being on a smaller sphere than Earth, hence the leaning buildings on the sides. Despite this I like effect a lot and hope you do too. This version is an "enhanced" one of the QI candidate (which had the buildings leaning even more). -- Benh20:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As I said on QIC page, it doesn't, even though taking night pictures of the Eiffel Tower is not permitted, because here the Eiffel Tower blends into a much larger place, which is Paris, and which has no copyright over it. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg for a similar topic. I'd add that setting copyrights over the night light scheme of the Eiffel Tower simply because it's been renewed (it doesn't strike me as being an artistic work, and is not different from the previous --free-- lighting) seems not right to me... I wonder how this case would be settled in court against a serious opponent. -- Benh21:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Est-ce une étoile filante... ou tout simplement un avion avec feux d'aterrissage allumés? C'est de toute façon possible avec une durée d'exposition de 25 secondes. -- MJJR21:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ça ne peut pas être un avion car les avions sont interdits de voler dans le ciel de la ville de Paris - les avions peuvent (quand même) voler au-dessous des banlieues. En plus, on peut facilement voir qu'il n'y a qu'une seule lumière blanche, de forme ovale dans le ciel - les avions ont au moins des feux de trois couleurs différentes (rouge, vert et blanc) --Booksworm09:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]