Nominate --Shizhao 03:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Shizhao 03:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Andreas Tille 07:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose Gropo 18th Jan, 2007 Support Fabien1309 10:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Rama 10:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral Godewind 11:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Zapping 13:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Tbc 14:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Yug (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support QuartierLatin1968 18:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support user:zanimum Oppose Ikiwaner 19:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support MPF 23:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support FML hi 00:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Petrus 17:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral Get_It (Talk ) 18:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Solipsist 19:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Knutux 11:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Neutral Hein 08:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Merops 09:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Knutux 11:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Support FoeNyx 16:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Shizhao 02:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] 
Nominate
Support --Shizhao 03:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - It's not a sunset. Unless Machu and Wayna Picchu's somehow got flipped around 180 degrees before the picture was taken. Needs a title correction. Other than that it's an excellent example of the sunrise cloud effect at the site.Gropo 18th Jan, 2007
Neutral - Interesting perspective, unfortunately overexposed sky -- Godewind 11:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
hi 00:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
