I think more than >98% of the wikimedia users display animations. The other <2% know what they did. Therefore voting against this animation due to your personal browser configuration is not fair IMHO. norro13:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you know you have animations off doesn't mean that you can know when a blank space is part of an animation. There is no good reason to have the first animation blank for any animation, let alone featured ones. I think it's a good enough reason, and I rarely oppose candidates. Dori | Talk14:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why not move the blank frame to the end of the sequence? The result would look the same, but without the problem Dori notes - MPF13:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- I think, John Reid, that this could be a very heplful illustration. It took me two cycles through to figure out what was going on because it moves so quickly. The design of the wheel is a little kitsch and distracting. I reccomend making it slower and simpler. But great work. Stephen.job14:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just another thing I notice that is confusing: At the beginning of the animation, when the four circles appear from left to right, it is very quick and confusing. Stephen.job14:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the new one is actually very slightly (by about maybe a quarter of a second) faster than the old - just watched them together over several cycles and the right-hand one slowly overtook the left-hand one - MPF22:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice idea but execution suffers from excess of colors – I counted seven hues – and somewhat cluttered layout. Needs a cleanup. -- Dontpanic15:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry; the animation is still not clear to me. The symbol for pi appears only after the entire thing is unrolled, at which point the animation has to be watched again to figure out exactly what's going on. And with 7 hues, as noted above, this is rather clutered. Stephen.job14:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]