Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pippit-closer.jpg

Richard's Pipit 'anthus ricardi' - featured

InfoAuthor and nominator --Benjamint444 00:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC) The Richard's Pipit (Anthus richardi) is a medium-sized passerine bird which breeds in open grasslands. This picture shows three chicks in the nest. I think it's of quite good quality, informative, and meets the standards, it has been promoted on wikipedia already Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Richards pipit but I want the opinion of the commons voters aswell.[reply]
Self Nom and Support --Benjamint444 00:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support strong mitigating reasons to size! Wow... --Diligent 01:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support a what??? --Wj32 02:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Diligent. --SvonHalenbach 13:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not something we see everyday. --Atoma 14:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support great shot --AngMoKio 19:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support / tsca @ 21:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - in many countries, taking a photo of wild bird chicks at the nest requires a license from the relevant bird protection authorities, to minimise disturbance. If this was followed as necessary, it should be indicated on the image page. Will support when this information is provided. - MPF 23:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC) - changed to support, now info provided - MPF 23:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support-LadyofHats 08:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --medium69 23:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wing-Chi 21:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wow. - Husky 12:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anyway, if animal protection license was required and got, information should be provided. --Javierme 14:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ceridwen 20:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Without a licence, taking this picture would be a criminal offence in some countries. I will support if the uploader can provide the information requested by MDF. --MichaelMaggs 23:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack MPF and MichaelMaggs -- Lycaon 23:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info There is no such need of licencing in Australia but I always take care not to disturb the nest --Benjamint444 00:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support i believe you. -- Lycaon 21:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Ziga 09:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 16 support, 1 neutral >> featured Alvesgaspar 07:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]