Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pittsburgh Union Station Rotunda Center 3008px.jpg

Image:Pittsburgh Union Station Rotunda Center 3008px.jpg, not featured edit

Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Ram-Man. 12:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Union Station rotunda skylight in Pittsburgh, USA.
Support -- Ram-Man 12:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive roof, impressive picture. I like the execution of structures in the picture and that the centre of the rotunda is a little offcentered. That makes it more dynamic in my opinion --Simonizer 13:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wow! No doubt that symmetry is a very important element of beauty. Pity that the picture is a little noisy. Alvesgaspar 14:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great symmetry.--Digon3 16:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thermos 17:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --WarX 09:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Annoying asymmetry of cropping[reply]
- It wasn't cropped, at least outside of the in-camera framing. -- Ram-Man 11:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to oppose here, as I do like the picture a lot. But the almost-but-not-quite symmetry is disturbing. An exactly symmetrical version would be preferred: this one looks as if the photographer tried but failed to achieve that. --MichaelMaggs 09:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I put a straight edge up to the screen and realized that this can't be perfectly symmetrical because the construction isn't perfectly symmetrical. Look at how the metal bars inside the center do not line up precisely, especially with that of the center star. Some of it is how the picture was taken, but some is inherent in the subject. It looks to me like some asymmetry was part of the design. -- Ram-Man 15:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support while not 100% symmetrical it is certainly symmetrical enough for me MichaD 17:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose don't like the composition that much -- Gorgo 13:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it is good... I mean the shades of the stone, that is really good. I have to support --Aktron 20:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack MichaelMaggs -- Lycaon 06:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]