Support Hmm let me think ab.. Support !! very nice pano, nicely stitched, nice colours ... maybe two tiny things however : a bit of noise in dark areas, and lots of flare, but these are really nothing... -- Benh18:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True thing, next time I go shoot night panos I'll take off my UV filter. that should help with the flare. Unfortunately my D40 only goes down to ISO 200 so there'll always be a little more noise than I would like. -Fcb98118:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ConditionalOppose The vignetting in the sky is too obvious and the glare should be cloned away. You should ask Klaus with K about how to remove the vignetting. Support once these issues are fixed. --Digon3talk18:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose if you want but the vignetting doesn't bother me in the thumb size, is difficult for me to decern in the 800px size and I don't notice it in the full size. also, sorry, but it would be extremely difficult and time consuming to clone out the ghost on every street lamp, not to mention I think the results would be bad. I will talk to Klaus with K though -Fcb98119:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
QuestionVignetting ? are you talking about the gradient that can be seen on the sky ? Because I believe this is natural. If the sun goes to bed on the right side of the picture, isn't it normal that this part of the sky is brighter ? - Benh20:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the gradient is natural and I have no problem with that. I am talking about how there are uneven bands in the gradient as a result of stitching, and those can be fixed. To see it best, zoom into the sky and scroll back and forth. --Digon3talk21:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Guidelines for nominators atate: "Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that: nightshots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime". In my opinion the picture is pretty, but has no value.Sorry.--Mbz101:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Mbz1 has stated here: "...i will vote to oppose no value pictures and i will vote to support value pictures no matter what quality they are." This is contrary to voting procedure. -Fcb98114:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Value for me in the Commons FP means that this is the best picture of its subject (which for a few minor details it is IMO). Wikipedia FPC is all about value in the article, which is the way you are talking about, just not the Commons FPC. --Digon3talk13:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment that looks like sensor dust somewhat left of the flag, btw strictly speaking, portland at dusk rather than portland at night Madmax3215:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I belive it is a star, plane, venus, or something like that, that enblend blurred in the stitching proscess.
Support Very nicely done Digon3. It might take some time but when I get back to those files, I'll see what I can do. Thanks -Fcb98118:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]