Support I think it's an impressive work, so I nominate it. For now, picture keys are only in french, so add it in your own language if you find translations -- Sémhur20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work. I added the Spanish table, but I had problems with translating a couple of them. Could someone check them, please? Poromiami02:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting mix of 2D and 3D elements. Biologically not very correct. (why are Malpighian tubes and anus outside the abdomen? - what about the names for the leg segments? - What are the white circles on the abdominal dorsal blood vessel? - what is a postgraphme ??? - ganglia and cerebral ganglion don't seem to be properly connected - Labial palp is not labelled - Muscles are drawn striped but they are not in reality). Lycaon07:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be an expert about bees. Thanks for your help to improve this diagram ! Sémhur
Donewhy are Malpighian tubes and anus outside the abdomen?: that's true, I have contacted the wikigraphist, he will redraw this part. Done, they are inside, now.
Donewhat about the names for the leg segments?: Do you talk about the letters e f g h i ? I havn't found a name for each one in french. They have only a generic name, articulations tarsales, articles tarsaux or métatarses. But perhaps they have names in other languages. Done, only the main have a name (basitarsus).
DoneWhat are the white circles on the abdominal dorsal blood vessel?: I think they are cardiacs valves, according to the diagram of this document (p. 27). Done, cardiacs valves.
Donewhat is a postgraphme ???: it was a spelling mistake, I have corrected it. The right word is "postphragme".
ganglia and cerebral ganglion don't seem to be properly connected: I don't see what you mean, can you be more precise ?
DoneLabial palp is not labelled: Is it the red appendix close to the tongue ? Done, description added.
DoneMuscles are drawn striped but they are not in reality: the diagram was made from this photo, and muscles appears to be striped, and also in this document (p. 25). If you have other sources, please tell us. Done, sources indicate striped muscles.
Oppose as per Lycaon. If these issues are resolved, this should result in another nomination so I know to change my vote. -- Ram-Man23:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is very well done. I cannot find the names of the tarsal segments either. At least generally speaking and after googling "tarsal segments", they are called tarsal segments or tarsomeres 1-5 [1]. --Al219:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Incorrect anatomy aside, it just looks bad. Mixing 2D and 3D is never good. Poor colors, too. This diagram has potential to be great; it just needs to be done in a more consistent style. Rocket00020:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - For aesthetical reasons. The colours, the mixing of 2D and 3D and the awfull checkerboard as a background. If this picture is also to be seen in a screen, why doesn't it have a white background? - Alvesgaspar21:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is easier to integrate a transparent background than a coloured one in the graphic charter of a website. Commons is not only for Wikipedia (and when it's used in WP, the background appear to be white). About the colours, well, to each his own... Sémhur13:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes. When Mediawiki converts this to PNG, it's either transparent if your browser supports it, or it's white. You should see a checkerboard, though, on the image description page. That is just to let you know there's nothing there. Rocket00014:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. And as mentioned the checkerpattern is just transparency, if you use a browser that supports svg you can can look at the rendered svg directly. /Daniel7823:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Now that the issues mentioned by Lycaon were fixed. Very nice and clear drawing which represent a lot of work as well as research to be accurate. Sting21:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]