Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Scrub wren female Vocalising444.jpg

Image:Scrub wren female Vocalising444.jpg, featured edit

Info everything by --Benjamint 04:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benjamint 04:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poromiami 6:03 3 October 2007 (CEST)
Support User:MarcusObal 05:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support sharp --Beyond silence 08:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot Ben --Fir0002 www 09:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Python 12:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question What's this halo above bird's head? Was this shot artificially sharpened? --Leafnode 11:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure, but I haven't sharpened it --Benjamint 12:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sergey kudryavtsev 13:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry Benjamint but you have better bird pictures. There is some noise/artifacts in the feathers and a better DOF could have been negotiated. I don't like the shadow in the eye either. The halo around the head may be the result of the camera sharpening adjustement. Alvesgaspar 16:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dori - Talk 21:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ I support the other version --Richard Bartz 15:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 21:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Acarpentier 02:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support the chest feathers look great --Ben^hello! 11:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support good cutting as well as very sharply. Nice shot. — Manecke 09:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why such a small, resampled version? You have a 8.3 Mpx (3,264 × 2,448) camera and you only post a meagre 12% of it. Lycaon 13:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Until above question is satisfactorily answered. Lycaon 04:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How can you oppose based on that question? If the image is within the guidelines, what does it matter if it could be bigger? You're not being fair to Ben if you think the image fulfills all the requirements and you still oppose it (you could be neutral though or push for changing the requirements). Dori - Talk 05:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My guidelines require the courtesy of an answer, so I can and will oppose. Lycaon 13:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Basik07 07:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chrumps 18:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and good quality pic :-) --Tony Wills 10:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Cecil 14:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]