- Info created by Holger Gröschl - uploaded by Olei - nominated by Simonizer 10:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support great composition and very good quality. Though there are some minor focus flaws, i like it --Simonizer 10:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Luc Viatour 11:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Olegivvit 14:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --AngMoKio 20:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great, clear photo! Simultaneously encyclopedic and aesthetic. Brighterorange 20:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- SupportRomary 20:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --MichaelMaggs 22:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support although the focus could be a bit better --Benjamint444 23:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Wow!! For info, these things are only about 5mm long - MPF 14:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good composition. --Atoma 16:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - lovely.--Eloquence 18:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Malene Thyssen 20:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Wing-Chi 20:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great! --Packa 20:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Benh 21:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Very well done shot Cat-five 20:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yay! Chabacano 18:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This is a excellent photo of an animal! Metoc 14:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support small flaws (focus, grain) compensated by colour and composition Lycaon 19:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support so sweet feet ;-) but to be serious: ack @ Lycaon --Überraschungsbilder 17:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Back feet are blurry (probably moved) but body is excellent. --Javierme 21:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Elcairo 21:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 07:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]