Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Skylab-KSC-73P-341HR.jpg

Image:Skylab-KSC-73P-341HR.jpg - not featured

Info created by NASA — uploaded by Adamantios — nominated by Adamantios
Support Skylab crew breakfast on launch morning. Adamantios 18:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment --> Excuse my ignorance, but it looks like a b&w picture of people having breakfast, what exactly makes it FP quality? Snowwayout 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- its 1973 would have thought that NASA would be using colour by then, Skylab was that hunk of metal that fell on Western Australia 1979. Interesting to see the methods for isolation but the image IMHO isnt FP. see wikipedia:Skylab for the full story Gnangarra 03:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not interesting, ditto to Snowwayout - MPF 09:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose — B/W picture of a meeting?? Indon 09:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose agree with opposers, its just a B&W picture of some people have breakfast --Digon3 14:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snowwauot, you asked, here´s your answer. If you "read" the photograph you can learn about life in NASA. A space mission is no ordinary thing, and this is a glimpse behind the curtains. Notice the mouth covers of non astronauts.. can you guess why? Notice the photographs, the note pad, the food itself. Just add it all up. A picture is wort a thousand words. Of course one needs cultural capital to decipher. And by the way, B&W photography has been around much longer than color photography, it was the standard of the press just until a few years ago and it has not lost its usefulness yet. Even with the introduction of color, B&W remained in use. Digital technology pushed it out much more than color film. To invalidate a photograph just because it is B&W is foolish. In fact, true photographic crafstmanship is revealed in B&W photography. Just look over Ansel Adams...--Tomascastelazo 15:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lycaon 22:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Interesting but nothing else. --Olei 22:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Thanks Tomascastelazo for your reply. Snowwayout 00:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Romary 06:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Uninteresting, pedestrian. TheBernFiles 15:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't miss the colours, but I miss the excellence. Roger McLassus 08:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special --Queryzo 14:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support huge historical value. // Duccio 19:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ...and?? -LadyofHats 22:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3 support, 12 oppose → not featured Roger McLassus 07:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]