Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:St Pauls Cathedral and Millenium Bridge.jpg

Image:St Pauls Cathedral and Millennium Bridge.jpg, not featured

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Nattfodd --Nattfodd 18:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nattfodd 18:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Confusing composition, not a good crop, overexposed clouds--Mbz1 18:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
- Comment Confusing? Composition is what I really like in this image, with the way the eye is drawn to the cathedral. What don't you like about the crop? Would you have liked more bridge on the right, perhaps? As for overexposed clouds, histogram and calibrated screen agree that it's not the case... --Nattfodd 18:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, you guessed right about the crop, but even, if the bridge was not cut, I still do not like the composition. You saw it in a real life and that's why you could see the picture differently. I looked at the picture in all resolutions and tried really hard to see what you do, but to me it just looks as Cathedral under construction. Sorry. --Mbz1 19:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
    - No need to apologize, I obviously have more elements than the average viewer to understand the composition and so am not the best judge. --Nattfodd 19:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the composition is really interesting. I also like the atmosphere of the picture. --Christoph Michels 13:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry, it's not a beautiful picture. Dantadd✉ 21:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well, I disagree. --Nattfodd 22:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - You are luckier than me. He opposed my lava picture with no reason given :)--Mbz1 23:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
- Comment I disagree as well: This is the finest, most creative and best composed picture I have seen on this forum for a long time. It captures well how things come together in a city like London. It is fragmented and collaged, yes, but isn't that what cities might really be about? And doesn't this picture capture this theme in a very skilled and carefully crafted way? It is certainly not a standard picture and therefore it most probably will fail nomination, but I am very glad that pictures like this one are uploaded to wikicommons. Please do more of this stuff! --Christoph Michels 23:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Wow, thank you very much Christoph. I shall certainly continue creating and contributing such pictures. --Nattfodd 09:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition -- Gorgo 22:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose João Felipe C.S 01:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please say why you are opposing. --MichaelMaggs 21:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support good photograph as such, better in larger format than 300px. Interesting and dynamic composition (old/new, straight/curvy...), good colours. Rama 13:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like the way the suspension cables almost coincide with the colonnade of the dome, and the dynamic, almost Vorticist, play of angles. It's not pretty, but it is special. Man vyi 15:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Confusing composition Christof01 17:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Oppose per Mbz1. Spikebrennan 21:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is fine, but the image suffers from oversharpening, and the shadows/contrast are very dark.

Pixel8 15:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Confusing composition to fp --Beyond silence 20:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC) vote cast after closing of nomination. Lycaon 20:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Lycaon 15:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]