Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by --Benjamint 09:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Benjamint 09:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - Unsharp and a bit noisy. The exposure solution doesn't seem to be the best one as well as the lighting - Alvesgaspar 10:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Too noisy for such a small picture. Resampling is not an option here. Lycaon 11:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Noisy. --Di go n3 talk 13:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support The background is noisy, and the tail and the bug are not sharp, but I think most of the wren is ok. Do yous see its body noisy? --Javier ME 20:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Great picture. Most part of the subject of the photo is sharp and not too noisy. The colors are very nice too. F r e e style nl (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support The noise is largely in the background which is OK. --MichaelMaggs 05:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Good composition but too many technical problems. A good photo, but not sufficiently outstanding to become FP IMO. -- Slaunger 21:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose It doesn't look right to me, probably due to issues mentioned. Dori - Talk 03:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Noise I can fix, but what in particular is wrong with the lighting and exposure? --Benjamint 12:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Ben chat 07:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]