- Info photographed by, uploaded by and nominated by --Benjamint444 06:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Info please have a look at this image and the similar one below before voting
- Support --Benjamint444 06:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - doesn't look well with the background. --Tone 10:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose --WarX 11:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Bird was probably colored! strong oppose is not a valid template, sorry. Lycaon 12:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - The colour is genuine - MPF 12:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose The background is too bright, does't go well with the bird --Digon3 16:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, although some cropping on the right would balance the picture. ~ trialsanderrors 17:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose --Lestat 09:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Background rather intrusive. No species name provided. --MichaelMaggs 08:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Info scientific name is Malurus cyaneus Ellis, 1782. Lycaon 16:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose --Karelj 21:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 08:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]