Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Westerngull.jpg

Self nomination Miskatonic 07:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good idea, but bad lighting norro 09:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad light => colours are not very good --Luke1ace 11:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack norro. --Dschwen 12:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Shizhao 13:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Calderwood 13:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bird not sharp enough -- Lerdsuwa 13:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Norro. Would have supported if bird had been better lit - MPF 11:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Kessa Ligerro 19:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it really is about showing a gull, then the bridge is disturbing and should not be there. If it is about a gull next to a bridge, this is just yet another pouétique photo, rather poorly executed due to bad lightening. Rama 10:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- skINMATE 06:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 01:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

11 Oppose => Not Featured--Shizhao 07:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]