Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2020

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2020 at 13:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Knocking it out of the park again. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support With this much detail, as usual, that slight blur in the center is more than forgivable. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see magenta CA at the margins of some groups of black tiles, but it's much more noticeable at full size on my 19-inch monitor than on my 13-inch monitor and certainly not a good justification for opposing. However, if you feel like doing the work to eliminate it, that would make this beautiful photo even better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: Thanks Mr Kekek. I worked on it. but there is a problem. camera raw doesn't recognize my lens (24 tilt shift) and can't adjust CA issue in lens correction menu. therefor I should handle it pixel by pixel hardly.--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support featured quality, despite weird blurriness in parts of the image. Maybe a stitching issue? Buidhe (talk) 02:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Buidhe: I dont see any stitching issue and blurriness except the middle of the picture in the lamp (because wind). to adjusting the picture, specify blurriness. thanks.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: , *@Daniel Case: I found lens profile of canon tse 24mm and added that to lens profile . I adjusted the picture CA as I could and blurry lamp replaced.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks like you got most of it. I still see some CA relatively near the lower left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 07:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Five-striped palm squirrel (Funambulus pennantii).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2020 at 14:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info We recently saw another nomination of this species that didn't pass. Charles' image seems to have a better angle, the image quality is good and I like the light, so hopefully it will do well here. created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A crowded image, but the animal is striking enough to stand out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support the reworked version, cropped and sharpened -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 02:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good, but the WB looks too warm - can you check it? --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I adjust WB in RAW so there’s no ‘right’ answer, but I have ‘cooled’ it down a bit Uoaei1. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, very good --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support The background is busy, but the animal is cute and has a good flow with the stripes. --Cart (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)

File:Theyyam of Kerala 3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2020 at 14:39:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic shot and IMO good enough quality for FP, despite the blurry hand. Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really difficult shot, and you absolutely nailed it, imho. That's a very busy subject in front of a very busy background, but there is still sufficient subject separation to make it stand out while having just enough sharpness in the background top set the scene. Within that, the face sticks out even more due to expression and make-up. Getting the front hand sharp(er) would be impossible without sacrificing subject separation and introduce either motion blur or noise (at 1/200s, f/1.8, ISO 10000 there's really not much wiggle room). I'm thoroughly wow-ed in terms of subject, composition and technical execution. --El Grafo (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice but background a bit distracting. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, wonderful! --PierreSelim (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cluttered, but it works here, to show the commotion and chaos. Quality is fine given that it was probably shot close to pitch-black. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one of the best images submitted for Wiki Loves Folklore 2020. --Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File: Pan American Health Organization Building.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2020 at 13:25:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created and uploaded by Difference engine - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it's a million miles from FP but it doesn't really wow me. 5.6mpx is not really outstanding for an easily repeatable shot. I don't find the composition outstanding, with the cut-off object sticking up at the left-hand side, and the blown highlights on the sign at the left are a bit annoying. It should be QI IMO, but struggling to see what makes it FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I have no problems with the composition. However, I do think the highlights Cmao points out could have been suppressed a little more, and the edges of the building on either side are visibly unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pretty Creek, West Coast Region, New Zealand 01.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 01:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)
Info All by me. It's a small natural waterfall on Pretty Creek in the middle of the bush on the West Coast, New Zealand. -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks lilted. Perhaps some of that is just the rocks or perhaps the angle-of-view introduces vertical perspective "distortion" but shouldn't the water that is more of a dribble than a gush be falling vertically? -- Colin (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment yes, and the white area of the 'pool' is blown. Can you rescue it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think there's any detail in that area anyway, what with the long exposure. Doesn't look blown to me. -- Colin (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - White area reduces significantly when you reduce highlights, so overexposed if not blown. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - White always reduces when you reduce highlights. The picture is not "over exposed". Bright white is brighter than any monitor or JPG can represent. Let's not make it grey please. Reality is bright. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Podzemnik but I really can't see much wow here. It's high quality as usual but the waterfall is not an outstanding subject, there is nothing especially interesting about it, and the composition doesn't really appeal to me. I do like the colours though, with the rich reds and greens. But overall this is QI not FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: No worries, thanks for the vote. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It is tilted: the water falls not vertically (per Colin) and also should flow upwards to reach the right side of the rock. I think, the surface of the rock is in fact horizontal. Then the water can reach the right side and falls vertical. --Llez (talk) 06:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm sure Podzemnik is capable of keeping his camera level. If there is sufficient pressure behind a stream, water has no problem flowing upwards for a short bit, and the dribble have enough kinetic energy to arch a bit. I had the same skeptic (and groundless) comments on one of my first FPCs. There is water to the right of Colin's note that is almost vertical so I take it the water is fanning out from the rock. Looking at the background with vines hanging down and plants growing up, the photo is dead straight. Take a look at what a "tilt adjustment" would do to them. I also firmly believe that pure white sometimes is just pure white in photos. However, I'm not wowed enough by the scene to support this. --Cart (talk) 13:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks everyone so much for their votes and comments. I'm honestly unsure if it's straight or not but even if it is, it seems like lack of wow will prevent the photo from succeding anyway. Thanks Colin for the note, I'll check it out later. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black-capped marmots edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 21:30:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

A pair of Black-capped marmots (Marmota camtschatica) in habitat. South Kamchatka nature park, Kamchatka peninsula.
A pair of Black-capped marmots (Marmota camtschatica) playing in habitat. South Kamchatka Nature Park, Kamchatka peninsula

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info created and uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nicely done. Meets set criterion #2: the same subject photographed at different times. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Left one is over-exposed. Neither very sharp. And does not qualify as a set as they are different animals King of ♥. Look at the size difference in the left photo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In both pictures, the same pair of marmots. The right picture was taken in 4 minutes after the left. Please see Ezif file. It is true that one is larger than the other - this is visible on both the left and right photos.--KSK (talk) 11:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Question As I must assume the photographer has told you these are the same animals, can you ask the photographer to explain the big difference in head sizes in the left photo, but not the right please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would vote for each if it were presented separately, so I am happy voting for the set. Perhaps they could do with a bit more sharpening but it's all a matter of taste. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: would've been so much better without the disturbing foreground... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral on these as a set since Charles' concern about these not being the same two animals seems valid to me and has not been addressed fully. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1, there are three of them in this shot from about the same time, so a switcheroo might have happened. --Cart (talk) 22:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. KSK must have made an unwarranted statement without checking anything. Another example of the care that nominators should take when nominating third-party images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 00:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Charlesjsharp is a very experienced animal photographer, and his opinion must be heard. At first, I was sure it was the same pair of animals. Charles' question is correct, and I sent it to the photographer. The author (Nadezhda Khaustova) does not have full confidence that in the second picture the same small marmot as in the first. Therefore, it will be correct to withdraw the nomination. However, the pictures are wonderful both and I intend to put one of them up for nomination at FP. Thank you all for supporting the nomination and discussing.--KSK (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 22:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination KSK (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Golden Temple of Amrithsar 7.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 15:26:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At least one dust spot to remove, right side is leaning in --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
and the image is tilted --Poco a poco (talk) 23:51, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; even without those problems the golden building doesn't look so great against a cloudy sky. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful building but per others the light is a bit dull and there are a couple of minor technical things to address. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delist~~ --Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Shagil Kannur: you nominated this and now you are putting a delist/oppose on it?? Did you perhaps mean to 'withdraw' this to end your nomination? If so, please replace the {{Delist}} with the {{Withdraw}} template. --Cart (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the wrong template--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting. I've striked out the faulty template so as not to be confusing. --Cart (talk) 06:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soleil couchant sur le Vercors.jpg (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 04:06:01

Info Another one I came across while doing recent categorization work. The original nomination, a decade ago, was dicey and is not a promotion by our present standards. Even if it were, its small size leaves much to be desired Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist crepuscular praise :-) Basile Morin (talk) 04:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- -donald- (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Too dark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist +1 --El Grafo (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Cayambe (talk) 13:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --StellarHalo (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist although the original nomination, at 7/3/0, would actually just about be a promotion on today's standards. But I agree this is a way off current FP standards. Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a promotion, unless I'm missing something. But as you say, that was then. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had said that under the mistaken impression that every oppose !vote needs to be offset by two supports, instead of applying that to the total !vote count. Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean, but that's OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delist small and soft Kruusamägi (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Peulle (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 12:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgian francs of 1929 obverse+reverse.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 16:29:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Money
Info created by Constant Montald, National Bank of Belgium, - uploaded by Brandmeister - nominated by Brandmeister -- Brandmeister (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Brandmeister (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 19:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pristine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Money

File:Kayakistas en Glaciar Grey.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 19:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Chile
Info created by Pablo A. Cumillaf - uploaded by Pablo A. Cumillaf - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Extremely noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a striking composition but I cannot support because of the technical issues. Wish that it had come out better. Buidhe (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but I agree it's a shame for such a nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motorboat Ryds 435DL and cloud reflections in Sämstad harbor 3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 18:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info All by me, -- Cart (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the reflections but this lot of ropes and wires looks nervous and disturbing to me. --Basotxerri (talk) 05:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the graphical quality of this image, the colors and the reflections. At first, I thought the wires and ropes were disturbing. However, they make you look twice. They prompt you to figure out what's going on in this picture (in addition to the reflections, which have a similar effect). The lines formed by the wires and ropes also correspond nicely with the lines of the clinker planking of the boat. In general, I like images where something can be discovered. Where you have to look twice. This one is a good example of that concept. – Now, close your eyes for a moment and imagine this photo without the graphical effect of the ropes and wires. To me, that would be a banal and ordinary documentary-style image of a boat in Sweden. I like this one better. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! Me, I like the almost-illusion of the boat being suspended in the air among the clouds by the ropes (they are all ropes, no wires). But I agree with Frank, without the ropes, the shot would be banal and I wouldn't have nominated it here. --Cart (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree with Frank, this would be boring if it wasn't for the ropes. Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy. Distracting lines, ordinary boat, bad light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 01:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Cmao. The reflections help, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank above, after pondering over Basotxerri's and Basile's comments. --Cayambe (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral interesting. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and Baso.--Peulle (talk) 12:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't see anything special in this photo, perhaps because I grew up in a fishing village near a pier where I saw boats all the time and my eyesight is no longer sensitive, sorry... --Wilfredor (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We all have different ways of relating to things. I grew up on boats, and I love trying to depict even simple ones in an good way. It isn't hard to make a nice photo of an extraordinary boat, the real art is to make an interesting photo of a common one. --Cart (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. --Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

File:Wagub Sandi.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 19:25:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Government of Jakarta Special Region - uploaded by Silsurya - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Face is not sharp at full-res. At 20 MP we'd give a bit of leeway if the subject is particularly special or difficult to photograph, but for an ordinary portrait with controllable conditions we'd expect perfect image quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with the others. Not really sharp even at 50% of full size. The standards for current-day posed portrait FPs are very high. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment However, this should be nominated at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others, and whites are blown out --Llez (talk) 07:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably a very useful photo but not FP quality in terms of sharpness, and I don't really think it's a great portrait - taking it face on with him staring into the camera makes it look more like a passport photo than a characterful portrait. Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez limón (Seriola dumerili), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 31.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 09:03:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Perciformes_(Perch-like_Fishes)
Info Exemplar of a mid-size of appox. 80 centimetres (31 in) Greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili), Madeira, Portugal. It is a popular quarry species for recreational fisheries as well as being an important species in commercial fisheries. It is the largest species in the family Carangidae and can reach up to 190 centimetres (75 in) length and a weight of 80.6 kilograms (178 lb). This species is not so common in Madeira so I was lucky to get this shot. We have no FPs of Carangidae. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality to be a underwater photo --Wilfredor (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wilfredor - one of your sharpest underwater photos. Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of sharpness and texture. - Benh (talk) 18:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was a bit quick. I know the conditions are not the easiest and that it's not easy to pick a "best" setup for the scene. Probably I'd have been more "forgiving" with a better composition and more side view. - Benh (talk) 18:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, I don't know what you mean with better composition, the background here is not loaded/cluttered, so composition here is not a minus, which to me is a plus. If you expect crispy sharpness with a nice background of colorful anemones (Nemo style) of species of which we have so far poor quality, then I ask for somebody to do the job. Benh: please, show me the texture and sharpness you ask for here on Commons, I've shot already 5000+ pictures underwater and I can tell you that this one is sharp. Regarding the "side view" that would rather result in DoF issues, as I'll only be able to shot with f/6.4 in the best of the cases, which was not be the case here as I had to dive deeper. Poco a poco (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A better composition wouldn't have the light-coloured rock where it is and would have some coral or whatever. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support This I like. Daniel Case (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition / the background doesn't work for me, sorry. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Podzemnik: I get down there, shot eveything that shows up and is worth taking a picture of. Underwater you never now what you'll see and most of the wildlife there goes away if you approach. Getting a good angle, a rare subject and good quality (I probably get rid of 95% of the images I take) is already quite of a challenge. Asking for a nice background in underwater photography doesn't sound fair to me and I see no problem in this case. You don't have the possibilites underwater that you have above it to choose the best angle or the nicer background. In my opinion your comment is not sound. Poco a poco (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the comment is sound. The background is not FP. I can tell you that wildlife does not go away when an experienced diver approaches. It is more tricky for novice divers who make more unecessary movements trying to get in the right place and then stay there. Although I don't take photos, I know how to approach underwater wildlife by using minimal movement and delicate buoyancy control whilst avoiding touching any coral. I think you need to be open to criticism and perhaps, as you become a better diver, you will find photogrpahy easier. You need to learn how to remain stationary in the water. You'll learn about drift diving. And swim throughs. It's not easyǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp The discussion here was rather about the background and not about my diving skills. When I shot this image I was still in the middle of the learning curve. By now I've 4 times more dives (yes, I've tons of images I didn't upload and not sure about that) than back then and don't consider myself a novice anymore. I keep learnimg thimgs and will always do but I don't think that I'm doing unnecessary movements. In fact, both hands are busy with rhe camera handles, so I can only use my legs. Poco a poco (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support-Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality is adequate for an underwater shot, but as I said earlier, this and many of your underwater shots lack some pleasing and real composition. I've held back from saying this on several of your noms since I know you don't react well to such comments. But you are still something of a newbie to diving and taking photos under water, you can't expect to go in at the same top level you have above the surface. Getting good compos in a new area always takes practice and patience. I'm not comparing with my own marine photos but with those made by more experienced divers like Rickard Zerpe. --Cart (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to be good at everything Poco, and what makes a photo good often lies in the small details specific to a genre IMO (and certainly not in the gear or going everywhere and just "click"). Landscape photographers will wait for atmospheric conditions and/or walk a long way to reach the good spot, bugs hunter will go in the morning when they sleep (my guess), animals hunters will know their habit and wait for them (my guess too). For all these u can't expect to get that many FP in my view. - Benh (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate background. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Expecting a nice background for underwater shots isn't just fair in my opinion. You will only manage that and get a HQ shot of the subject if the background is nice everywhere (great coral reef type of thing). Otherwise you cannot expect from an underwater photographer to wait and wait to get a good subject in a nice background from the ideal POV. Air is limited by the bottle and dives are expensive (let alone the equipmemt), too. For this shot I'd have understood comments like "too ordinaey fish" but not that the expectation regarding composition underwater is similar to shots above it. Poco a poco (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You have another issue Poco a poco that you cannot solve - you are not diving in clear water. Other locations around the planet will be much better. Crystal clear water and beautiful corals etc. You'll have to wait till we can travel again... Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 12:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 54.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 08:44:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Brown moray eel (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 08:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI, yes, but this one just doesn't stand out for me like your other recent underwater pics have. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case: comparing this image with this one of a sea urchin is like comparing this one of an elephant in the park with the biggest concentration of them worlwide with this one of a leopard devoring the killing. Sea urchins are literally everywhere underwater, day and night and move very slow, morays are rare, are mostly active in the night and are tipically hiding in holes (so that you can see the head if you're lucky). Maybe I should have provided more information about the challenges of this image, which were many. Poco a poco (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair comment. I don't take photos underwater, but I don't recall ever being in as good a position with a moray in 150+ dives. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco and Charles. Since this is a difficult species to capture, it's very clear and the quality is acceptable, so I think it's good enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the difficulty of capturing this shot --StellarHalo (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. Even difficult subjects and underwater shots need some kind of good composition for FP. As I have experienced. --Cart (talk) 21:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination To be honest I don't get it, probably one of my most difficult shots ever Poco a poco (talk) 12:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 12:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trout lily, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2020 at 01:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Trout lily - anterior view
Trout lily - lateral view

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Liliaceae
Info: Trout lily (Erythronium americanum); anterior and lateral view. Improvement of the original nomination - better brightness. All by --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good set nomination although there is a bit of posterisation in the background especially on the second image. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why the renomination so soon? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I figured out how to address the main criticism of the original nom. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yes, much better than the original nom. Renata3 (talk) 02:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Liliaceae

File:Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) juvenile.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2020 at 09:39:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)
Info The expression Bald as a coot refers to the white feathers on the adult's forehead, not the sparse head feathers on very young chicks. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's lovely, and good quality as usual. Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The blur on the right feels somewhat aggressive to my eyes, but the subject is the bird, which is captured superbly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background distracting --Wilfredor (talk) 14:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I wasn't sure about this one, but I do agree with Wilfredor, quality is good and the subject valuable but he got a point here --Poco a poco (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)

File:Nassarius bellulus 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 07:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Nassariidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Nassariidae

File:Poster for Quo Vadis (1913 silent film).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 08:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Advertisements
Info created by The National Ptg. & Eng. Co. - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colourful poster. Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Advertisements

File:One of the iwan ceilings of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 14:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another mosque photo, the other fp were much better, but this one is still spectacular. Assalam Alaikum! --Wilfredor (talk) 14:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice again. Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The corners are not as good as usual, but at 85 MP I really can't complain. We've just been spoiled by all your other work. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @King of Hearts: Thanks. you're right. I obtained cpl (polarizer) filter for avoiding this problem. in future pictures will not have this issue.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another spectacular iwan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support again. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support These ceiling photos with some heaven always makes me think about splendidly designed space ships. Perhaps due to the movie Dune (1:02 and on). :-) --Cart (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:SL Demodara near Ella asv2020-01 img03.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 13:36:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info Sri Lanka Railways S12 on the Nine Arch Bridge, Demodara ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The composition does not convince me, cloudy sky that generates a boring sky, takes too far from the main subject, too many tourists confuse the scene. I don't know if the main subject is the train or the tourists photographing the train --Wilfredor (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but per Wilfredor. I think it's actually a really nice shot and it must have taken a bit of planning to be there when the train was just passing. But the weather conditions were not kind to you and they have created a very dull, flat light. I wonder whether the picture would be improved with a bit of fine-tuning to increase the contrast. Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Cmao's oppose; I think it might be fixable with more contrast. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hmmm... I think this would work better as an event shot (Hey! The train is coming to the bridge, let's go and greet it!) focusing on the train and the people, rather than as a wide landscape shot. Could perhaps be cropped to show this. Note added. What do you think? --Cart (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually my purpose was a picture in "Kabelleger style". But thanks for suggestion anyway. --A.Savin 22:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It did remind me of one of Kabelleger's shots. IMO it really is very nearly there, it's just the light is so flat. Are you sure you don't feel like adding a bit more contrast? I had a quick play with it in Photoshop and I think it would convince me to change my vote. Cmao20 (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think I already applied it very, very generously; let's not overprocess... ;-) And it's true that you cannot do anything about the clouds and the people -- and that's essential. But I had to give it a try. I had shot a similar picture too, with same weather conditions of course. --A.Savin 00:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A.Savin, to me that image is much better than this nom. It is intriguing, dynamic and it speaks to my imagination. I would absolutely support it. --Cart (talk) 08:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 01:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 009.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 00:55:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a lovely postcard. Cmao20 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted ccw, the horizon is not horizontal --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Uoaei1: Actually, it's due to curvature of the horizon, not any photographic flaw such as barrel distortion or tilt. When you stand at a high point and look to the horizon, it will look curved to your eyes due to the natural curvature of the Earth. Since only the left half of the horizon is visible, that's why it appears tilted, but you can verify that the horizon is level in the center. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ok! --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ahmad^talk 07:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 23:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

File:Pähkla allikas.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 21:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Estonia#Saare County
Info created & uploaded by Amadvr - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's daring to make a composition where the reflections take up most of the frame, but I actually really like it. Definitely an unusual and interesting mood. Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow -Killarnee (C•T•U) 23:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Estonia#Saare County

File:Poplar hawk-moth (Laothoe populi) late instar larva.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 09:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though more space on the right would have been better for balance. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I like a bit more space in front than behind. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no wonder it looked weird to me! I thought the head was at the right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OFFICIAL WARNING to King of ♥. Do not kiss the caterpillar. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice composition - Benh (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)

File:Ras el afia4.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 06:21:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info created & uploaded by alioueche mokhtar - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good mood, but most of it is just too dark. Also not very sharp for a 10 MP image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaernten CoA.svg (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2020 at 14:17:09

Info Does not stand out in any way from others of our graphical interpretations of the official coats of arms of states of Austria, Germany, or any of the first-level administrative divisions of other European countries. Obviously could be improved with vastly better quality graphic like what Heralder did with pretty much all the official coats of arms of Spain but I am not counting on that happening anytime soon. (Original nomination)
Delist Our standards for coats of arms have come quite a long way in the last 14 years. This image is not even close to the best coats of arms we have on here --StellarHalo (talk) 14:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nomination. There are so many similar images on Commons and nothing to suggest this is one of the best in its category. Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom Buidhe (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --Peulle (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 22:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethel Smyth.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2020 at 19:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Unknown photographer/George Grantham Bain Collection - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! Buidhe (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Lilium martagon Tauerntal 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 08:17:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Liliaceae
Info Turk's cap lily (Lilium martagon) in the Tauern Valley, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure, what is nicer: The flower or the background ;-) -- -donald- (talk) 08:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is pretty special. Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, I like that the photo shows the environment where the plant is growing. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the concept of showing plants and animals in their specific environment. This is one of the best plant shots I've seen this year! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture of the flower, and the background makes it special. --Domob (talk) 10:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Liliaceae

File:Wroclaw - Biblioteka Uniwersytecka i Kosciol NMP na Piasku 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 07:13:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Launch escape motor firing! 🔥🔥🔥🚀 -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 22:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland

File:Cypripedium reginae - Presqu'ile.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 21:30:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info: Showy lady's slipper (Cypripedium reginae); all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Using a flash with flowers outdoors doesn't work. The flash make it look unnatural, Poco a poco (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO could do with a tad more sharpening, but good quality and the flash doesn't make it look unnatural to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question: would you kindly elaborate on how the flash made it look "unnatural", Poco a poco, Podzemnik? I see no distorted colours, strong shadows, etc. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do see a bright subject with cooler colors then the darker and warmer background. To be honest, I wouldn't have come to the idea to use a flash for this image. Sometimes (bad lighting and moving subject) you are kind of forced to but it doesn't apply here. Just my opinion. --Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was shooting against the Sun. And since contre-jour was not the desired effect here, use of flash was inevitable. Normally, I'd just look for a better-lit subject, but this plant was the last late bloomer - they tend to flower earlier in the season. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cosmonaut: It just doesn't look natural to me. The conditions are sometimes unafavourable and even if you do your best to capture the best possible photo in that moment, it doesn't mean that it's a FP level. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Poco. Using some diffuser or reflector might have been better. I shot this against the sun and used a reflector, that way I could direct the light in a more pleasing way. --Cart (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Moritz Rugendas in Brazil 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 17:53:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
Info created by Johann Moritz Rugendas - uploaded, photographed and nominated by Wilfredor . Because the comment of User:Ikan Kekek on another nomination, I travel back to Brazil to take a picture of this painting again to fix the the area out of focus and get original colors by applying WB. -- Wilfredor (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wilfredor (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terrifying. --Cayambe (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 15:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A powerful artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, that's dedication! Buidhe (talk) 04:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed terrifying. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Groups

File:Illuminated Ferris wheel at dusk in Vientiane, Laos.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 14:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created - uploaded- nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I wonder if it's the same wheel which once was near That Luang. Unfortunately, the arbitrary cut at the bottom doesn't work for me. - Benh (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hmm, I like it overall but after reading Benh's comment I can't quite unsee what he points out. IMO not quite as well composed as your other recent FPs for that reason. Cmao20 (talk) 16:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Per above, the POV is really good but the bottom crop and lack of symmetry there spoil it Poco a poco (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very dynamic. Perfect symmetry is unnecessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The cut at the bottom indeed seems a bit disturbing to me, but overall this is a great picture and the composition is fine. --Domob (talk) 10:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's a car behind, and a few bushes. Of course I would have considered including the bottom otherwise. Thanks! -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And this was just a magical scene. There's also a wonderful bouncing castle at the right, with a slide, and a delightful carousel. I may upload an overview later -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The bottom crop, even though I understand the missing bit wasn't nice. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here it is: overview of the same wheel (night shot taken 10 days later) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the glowing neons make that photo much better in my opinion :) - Benh (talk) 08:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your opinion. Here I like the combination of the neons with the pastel colors of the sky at dusk -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh I agree with Benh, I like the shot you link to better as well. I might nominate it if you choose not to. Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both are very different in my opinion. Thanks a lot for your feedback -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isidor Kaufmann - The Kabbalist (c. 1910-20).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 07:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info created by Isidor Kaufmann - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good photo and striking painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flawless painting. --Gnosis (talk) 03:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 19:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings

File:Asiatische Keiljungfer.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 16:50:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Gomphidae (Clubtails)
Info Another masterful shot of a dragonfly by Sven Damerow. I was really impressed by how sharp the water droplets are, and the 41mpx resolution is outstanding. Additionally, the river clubtail is an endangered species in most of Western Europe, so this is especially valuable. created by Sven Damerow - uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really nice quality and will support if exposure is slightly adjusted - it is too bright. The species is hard to find, but is NOT endangered. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough - have done some research on it and it seems you're right. A few sources refer to it as endangered but I think they are using the word in a different way to its scientific meaning. I have removed the 'endangered' claim from the image description. Cmao20 (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 20:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Excellent Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Gomphidae (Clubtails)

File:Tjasker Zandpoel, windmolen bij Wijckel. Friesland. 10-06-2020 (actm.) 10.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 16:39:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects Detail windmill (Polder mill.)
Info Tjasker Zandpoel Municipal monument in De Fryske Marren. Detail of the upper part of the mill. The round disc is the brake.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure it would have worked even on a better day, Agnes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what you are going for and it's a clever idea to think of taking this shot but it doesn't quite work for me. There is quite a bit of blue CA that should probably be fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, this composition doesn't work for me. Buidhe (talk) 16:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 21:52:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 22:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. The specular reflections are unfortunate (maybe a cloudier day or a different time of day would have helped), but overall this is still a great picture. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @King of Hearts: Thanks Mr tony. I checked this place along a day but the reflections are from light that inter from doors not sun. I closed doors but the place got dark. I captured this picture with cpl filter. that helped to remove a lot of reflections but direct light doesn't removed even with cpl filter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mind-blowing tile work, very beautiful. --Gnosis (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Gnosis. --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File:Stockstadt Oberhuebnerwald Dick.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2020 at 21:50:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by User:KaiBorgeest - uploaded by User:KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An interesting scene, possibly, but there's an awful lot of shadow and the color seems kind of off. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Hmm, I see what you were going for here. It breaks a lot of rules and I'm not sure I find it completely satisfying but the scene is mysterious and actually quite well composed. Perhaps it would work better in black and white? Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It just doesn't create any wow impression for me. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you re-develop the image from the raw image file (probably *.CR2 or *.CR3), to make the midtones brighter and get better colours? --Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please provide this with nomination with the correct gallery as requested in the top line of this. Thanks. --Cart (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light has some promise, but the scene is not wowing me and the colors look a bit washed out, sorry. --Cart (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ящірка прудка скрутилась.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 09:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Lacertidae_(True_Lizards)
Info created by Сергій Мірошник - uploaded by Сергій Мірошник - nominated by Kulawik.pl -- Kulawik.pl ^{Napisz do mnie / Write to me} 09:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kulawik.pl ^{Napisz do mnie / Write to me} 09:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If she was protecting her eggs it would be a better composition --Wilfredor (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment and perhaps eating an insect while holding another in one hand, Wilfredoǃǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not criticizing you, I was just letting my imagination run a bit :), I love your pictures --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is this a sand lizard (Lacerta agilis)? --StellarHalo (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Can you please provide identity, please; should not be FP without. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@StellarHalo: , @Charlesjsharp: Yes it's Lacerta agilis (information is on photo description) --Kulawik.pl ^{Napisz do mnie / Write to me} 17:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Very striking but it is a shame the DoF is so shallow. Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ The Dof is not brilliant but F13 was used. I like the circular composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks cool in this pose but to be honest I have never seen a lizzard stand like that Poco a poco (talk) 23:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others - great head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 07:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 10:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please provide species identification in the photo description, categories for the species and English description. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Fix what Podzemnik says and you have my support vote. I can't believe how lax reviewers have become regarding such basic requirements for an FPC nom. --Cart (talk) 21:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Well you've lost my support vote Kulawik.pl. Why did you claim species name is in photo description? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. I expected you to make the requested changes, but until you do, this photo should not pass. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Podzemnik: @W.carter: @Charlesjsharp: @Ikan Kekek: The first two words in the name of the file are the animal's name. Ящірка прудка is indeed Lacerta Agillis. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a vernacular name which does not help identification, not the scientific name as claimed by Kulawik.pl. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That might well be, but an FPC must also have a good description and be properly categorized, that is how users will find the photo in the vast archives of Commons. Read the rules. Posting pretty pictures and hoping "someone else" will do all the boring paper work is not good manners. -Cart (talk) 04:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This problem was silently corrected (except that the 2nd word of a Latin species name should be lowercase in the file descriptions). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Lacertidae_(True_Lizards)

Ship Caballo de trabajo grounded in Ciudad el Carmen edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 18:08:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Shipwrecks
Info created by Cvmontuy - uploaded by Cvmontuy - nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it is cropped too tight, so gives no impression of the scale or surroundings. A few other photos from that category seem to be better. --Andrei (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good photo for instagram no more. JukoFF (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Andrei. I like File:CaballoDeTrabajo2020p3.jpg better, though I'd have to live with it for a while to decide whether to support it if it's nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think the dead-on bow view works for this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sankt Georgen am Längsee Sankt Martin 1 Filialkirche hl. Martin 12092018 4609.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 15:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
Info This is a simple photograph but I find it really beautiful and striking; even the contrail somehow adds something to it. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm frankly not sure this is amongst the best. Trivial centered framing and good but common quality in 2020. - Benh (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I get why the centered framing doesn't appeal, but for me this is one of those pictures that is worth featuring purely because of the beauty of the motif. As you say the image quality is clearly up to scratch anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think the clouds, leading path, and quality make it more than a QI. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery corrected - this is not Germany but Austria --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You’re right - an oversight on my part. Thanks for fixing that. Cmao20 (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I'm never a fan of churches, I find this elongated roof rather impressive, and the excellent weather conditions finally convince me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - good image; QI + VI but IMO not enough wow. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose no wow StellarHalo (talk) 02:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've to agree with Benh, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per other opposers, truly sorry. --Ivar (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The composition is simple but good, and I am inclined to support, providing that a dust spot a bit to the left of the right margin to the right of about the center of the steeple is edited out. -- Ikan Kekek
- Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your review, Ikan. Dust spot was cropped out and a new version was uploaded. —- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 04:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice church and good quality, but IMHO not special enough for FPC. For instance, the foreground with the road is IMHO not very appealing (it is fine, but not FP). --Domob (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I marked another dust spot, so please edit that one out, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done @Ikan Kekek: What a shame! There was another dust spot to be cloned out. Thanks for detecting it, Ikan. —- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You bet. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Domob. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination. Really sorry Johann Jaritz but I can't see this getting three more supports by midday tomorrow. Plenty of people did think this one was worthy of FP though, so I don't think it was too far off the mark. I promise I'll find another of your pictures to nominate in the next few weeks. Cmao20 (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isidor Kaufmann - The Kabbalist (c. 1910-20).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 07:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info created by Isidor Kaufmann - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good photo and striking painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flawless painting. --Gnosis (talk) 03:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 19:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings

File:Bharathanaatyam at Kerala school kalolsavam 3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 13:42:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info A Bharathanatyam contestant at 60th Kerala School Kalolsavam, an annual event conducted by kerala State Government. Kerala School Kalolsavam is known as the biggest youth festival in Asia.

created by, uploaded by, nominated by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better if that yellow tag and safety pin at the bottom were cropped away (or at least the tag). --Cart (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Also, if the tag is to be included (which I should clarify is OK with me), it should be transcribed (and preferably translated, too) in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

included -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shagil Kannur, you should have included it on the file page. It serves little purpose on this nomination page since it will be archived after nine days to an obscure corner of the Commons. All info should be on the the file pages so that anyone who wish to use this photo can read it. Getting a lot of info on a good photo to users is what FP is all about. I have copied it to the right place. --Cart (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, Cart. This is an intriguing photo. It looks like she's tearing up, and that might merit explanation, too, but perhaps Shagil might not know whether it's emotion or contact lens problems. But regardless of that detail, it's a good photo of a dancer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Cart, for your great support.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent work, I am not too concerned about the tag. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file name itself is indicating about the tag meaningShagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

People who don't read the language would have no way of knowing that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 08:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the code number tag.Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree, you should crop just below the belt --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the description. I have already mentioned about the tag. It was a dance competition as part of a widely recognized event.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They prefer for the tag not to be shown for aesthetic reasons. And I'd prefer that crop, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That really is a nice improvement. You might want to ping Charles, at least (if not everyone who voted before the change). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:SL Demodara near Ella asv2020-01 img02.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 22:38:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info Sri Lanka Railways S12 on the Nine Arch Bridge, Demodara created and uploaded by A.Savin - nominated by Cart -- Cart (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like I said on the similar nom earlier, I think this is a much better version of this train scene. It is dynamic, intriguing and just the sort of image you'd want to go exploring for details. It speaks to my imagination like some wild cross between a Kabelleger photo, a Bollywood film set and an old Tarzan comic book. -- Cart (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. It has a real feeling of adventure that the other picture is lacking. Cmao20 (talk) 23:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course ;-) --A.Savin 01:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. Much better composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. --Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ik meen me te herinneren, dat Tarzan zich via lianen verplaatste. I seem to remember that Tarzan was transported by lianas.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Craftmen at work, bamboo basket weaving and textile mobile sculptures, in Heuan Chan heritage house, Luang Prabang, Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 09:01:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created & uploaded by User:Basile Morin - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this photo, and it's of a type that we don't often see on FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of the classic engravings from the Encyclopédie depicting arts and crafts (like e.g. this one). --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good documentary picture - Benh (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for nominating this picture, really great. --Gnosis (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you too, Gnosis, for nominating it on fa-wiki :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome! It's a pleasure. --Gnosis (talk) 02:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 20:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good nomination, I like the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support good framing --Andrei (talk) 11:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Lucretia Mott, signed photo, by F. Gutekunst.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 11:21:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by F. Gutekunst, Philadelphia - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo. It looks to me like she had a really small neck at this time in her life! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- My impression is that it's somewhat of an optical illusion caused by all the fabric ruffles and ribbons. Makes it hard to figure out exactly where her neck is. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 17:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Ringelblume Wassertropfen-20200619-RM-080740.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 09:12:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order : Asterales
Info created & uploaded by User:Ermell - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another of Ermell's fantastic focus stacks of bedewed flowers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Excellent quality as usual, but not sure about the saturation. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Charlesjsharp I agree, slightly reduced.--Ermell (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail and very good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Domob (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support These focus stacks are legendary. Cmao20 (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top foto!--Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support And it would look even better cropped into a square IMO (but if you like it better this way, by all means leave it as is). Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although there are some patches with unsharpness caused by stacking --Llez (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good sharpness and nice light.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Order : Asterales

File:Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 20:27:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rubiaceae
Info: Common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis); all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be sharper, but I don't care. The compo and light of these corona-like plant balls is gorgeous. --Cart (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I might add a bit more sharpening but this is a nice shot and a good unusual subject. Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the better-composed plant photos I've seen. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I never knew that the Coronavirus could grow so big. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also think the composition is what sets this one appart - Benh (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder how long it will be before people start calling this a "virus tree" . Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rubiaceae

File:Filhote de Jacaré.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 15:27:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Alligatoridae (Alligators and Caimans)
Info created and uploaded by LeonardoRamos - nominated by ArionEstar -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the composition, but the sharpness is poor and it is very noisy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice shot and not too far off FP but I agree with Charles that the noise is a little bit much. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not great IMO and more water than necessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-171544.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 20:32:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Salamandridae (True Salamanders)
Info Fire salamander in a stream in the Franconian Switzerland that dries up in summer. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI deservedly, but this just doesn't do it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question how could u get a salamander to remain still for a close up stack like this? - Benh (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info @Benh: @Cmao20: I stood with the tripod in shallow water and the camera was mounted upside down to be close enough above the water surface. The animal moves about as slowly as a toad and always pauses for a moment. Of course you need a little bit of luck.--Ermell (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Thanks. It's an amazing shot. - Benh (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed. Look at the animal's head, in particular. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Really excellent for me. Beautiful creature and it's extraordinary that you have managed to get a focus stack with everything so sharp. I have no idea how you even began to achieve that. Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors, shoot, focus and lovely animal --Wilfredor (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 12:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:54, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians#Family : Salamandridae (True Salamanders)

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 21:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow again.--Ermell (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing, and I'm impressed that the corner sharpness this time is so good. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Huge resolution but underexposed in my view (overall a bit dark) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Basile Morin: , @Wilfredor: , Thanks. you're right about a little darkness. but I captured this place with this light pattern. the light coming from above and left and right of the picture was darker. I found this pattern of light more attractive. if darkness is annoying I can work on it. --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That may improve the attractiveness, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW again. --Gnosis (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is better than the ones with more visible reflections. Buidhe (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as usual. --Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How many pictures of this kind have already been nominated and awarded? I think it's getting enough. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings. We have 203 FPs of church ceilings, 2 of synagogues, 1 of a temple and 23 of mosque ceilings. I think we can stand a few more of these very high-quality photos. ;-) However, I would really like to see some of the other 4,296 religions represented too. Not even all major religious groups have photos. --Cart (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Killarnee: , @W.carter: I can earn money by selling these picture's copy right. but to be seen by all, I abandon the copy right by uploading them in Wikimedia. I think these works are Masterpieces of Persian architectural art and rarely seen before. I agree with Miss Carter but I think we should consider these pictures Regardless of religion. these pictures reflect pure art and history of ancient world Whether Christian or Muslim. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's all art and architecture. We just have a rather crude way of sorting photos here on Commons since our tagging system is antiquated. I sincerely thank you for donating these photos to WikiMedia, however there are always voters who get bored if there are a lot of similar photos nominated one after the other, whatever the subject. It's a very picky and tough audience. Perhaps if you had some other views or artwork you could alternate with, then you wouldn't risk what we call "reviewer-fatigue". Most experienced nominators try to mix up their noms to keep the audience alert, since it increases the chances of noms getting featured. FPC is always craving new fresh things. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Miss Carter. I consider it. Although I seen voters wondering of my new pictures and that's raised me to nominate them.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So I've seen several such mosaic pictures in the last few days and think it's enough, which is why I don't give a pro. And what do you want to tell me "you could also sell the pictures"? Should it be blackmail or should I fall at your feet now? -Killarnee (C•T•U) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Showing the architectural masterpieces to the world is my proud and honor. that's caused donating them. it's not blackmailing. you can oppose with my nominations. but I don't understand why you think other voters shouldn't support. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't give a pro because I just think that there are enough pictures of this kind, even if they are well done. At the end of the year, every second picture at POTY is a mosaic picture. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

every of these pictures are unique and designing them took many years. these art works not simple mosaic, they are unique. even now making these masterpieces are very hard and rarely can find architecture could design them. I think you don't know this art well. good luck.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I recognize the art and I know what kind of masterpieces they are, but I would like it if you would nominate landscapes for example. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems like most of us are not bored - these ceilings are all really beautiful and different from one another, and we've seen way more pictures of churches than of mosques - but I'd surely love to see other types of photos of beautiful or interesting motifs in Iran, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Ikan Kekek. Amirpashaei, we have absolutely loads of featured pictures of church interiors and it shouldn't stop us featuring any more as long as we can still find pictures of outstanding quality and extraordinary subjects. The exact same is true with your pictures. In fact we are quite underrepresented with mosques (and even more so with synagogues, Hindu/Sikh temples etc.) compared with churches, so as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to vote support for almost any of these pictures you present us with. Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: , @Ikan Kekek: , @Cmao20: Thanks for your support and high understanding of art. My purpose of nominating these pictures is to be seen better and using in more pages. --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say "seen better and using in more pages", but this image is not used as far as I can see Amirpashaei. So why not? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant relevant pages. on of the my purposes is saving these monuments in image form. because most of heritage in Iran don't maintain very well.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, I'm not surprised by that. The photo is recently uploaded and the author is foremost a photographer donating his photos to us and not a very active Wikipedian. Not every uploader will immediately go about spreading their photos on as many articles as possible. Also remember that Commons photos are used by many, many other sites outside the Wiki-verse, those uses don't show up on the Commons file page. I often find my photos online in the most unlikely places, but it always takes a while for a photo to get spread. By uploading photos here we make them available for people and that is enough. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Miss Carter. Exactly. I agree.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find it a bit boring to see so many similar candidates (and ceilings are a bit of a super cooperative easy subjects), but they are all incredible shots in my view. - Benh (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not bored. :) On the contrary, I find these pictures absolutely stunning. –– B2Belgium (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing. JukoFF (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File:Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 01:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this shadow striking and the sunlight harmoniously spread around like a theater spot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice idea. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green version of Adam's Peak 🌲🌲🌲 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The resemblance is actually pretty uncanny! Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adam's Peak being in the water, it allows the sun's rays to reach it really very early. But similar idea :-) Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ordinarily I'd find the shadow distracting but it's so perfect here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

★⭑⭑⭑⭑ 🌄 ⭑⭑⭑⭑★ :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quite nice and interesting idea, but the (light on the) background is a bit too distracting to make this photo very "special", in summary the half top is not very very nice. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Christian here Poco a poco (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian Ferrer. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In my opinion the light on the background is fine, but the shadow at the right on the mountains can be competitive. It comes from another peak behind. However, the shadow on the trees (left and right) accentuates the impression of light centered in the middle -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

A crop that makes the shadow more central. Pinging the previous voters @Johann Jaritz, Cmao20, The Cosmonaut, Aristeas, and Daniel Case: @Llez, Christian Ferrer, Poco a poco, and Fischer.H: Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine by me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much clearer focus. The clouds are lovely in isolation, but distract from the main message of this image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral a bit improved, but still not enough eye catching IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both versions are fine for me. --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I prefer the original version. The sky makes for a more pleasing composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It doesn't convince me either, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

The chosen alternative is: File:Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg

File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 17:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good, but not geo-coded. Can you please add the location coordinates! --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you @Uoaei1: for review. Location added --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

weak oppose I'm going to dissent. It's nice, but not exceptional panorama with a midday light and a bland composition - Benh (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think Benh's oppose is unreasonable, but I find enough to enjoy looking at the panorama in high resolution, even if the composition could maybe be a bit more interesting. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

71 Mpx crispy sharp image: very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose per Benh. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Benh's oppose is reasonable, but also is a nice panorama. --Gnosis (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of detail. --Ivar (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question where do you find the lack of detail Ivar? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment look at grass, it's unnatural. --Ivar (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Sabina Bajracharya (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

File:Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 49.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Brown moray eel (Gymnothorax unicolor) found in Madeira, Portugal. I'm giving it another try. Morays are rare, they are usually hiding in holes and active during the night. I cross my fingers to hope that the composition here is acceptable. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now this is more like what I want in a photo of a moray eel. Lurking in a crevasse ready to spring on an unsuspecting prey. The "sinister grin" is a nice bonus. --Cart (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That looks good - Benh (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Sharp head, good facial expression as Cart says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with the above, this is a much better shot and I wouldn't have supported the other one if I had noticed you'd done this one too. Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. This is much better than the previous one. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nice shot for me! Famberhorst (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. --Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker -- 2020 -- 8874 (bw).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created and uploaded and by XRay -- XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info It's simple, it's minimal. I like compositions like this. But if you need a full view of the gate, here it is: Gate --XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minimalism at its best. Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would crop out a tiny sliver at the bottom, as the bottom left corner is distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I just cloned out the tiny area. --XRay ^talk 04:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Podzemnik (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#China
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition. These cascading reliefs remind me the curves of the colored maps met in some scientific articles -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is something different in a nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#China

File:Ferdinand Hodler - Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 05:43:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Landscape painting Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus (Lake Geneva as seen from Chexbres) by Swiss symbolist painter Ferdinand Hodler in his personal style known as "parallelism". Painted in 1905 at the time period when various modernist movements were revolutionizing the world of Western art and landscape paintings were becoming a less dominant genre. created by Ferdinand Hodler - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Important artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO Hodler is somewhat underestimated. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 11:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes

File:Wooden bench swing and wicker hammocks on a bamboo footbridge in paddy fields a sunny day during the monsoon, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding composition and atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support so nice atmosphere Benh (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, still, isn't the left side leaning out a bit? Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, yes. Fixed Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Other objects in landscapes

File:Nieuw blad van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica). 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 05:27:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae New beech leaf.
Info Fresh new leaf of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) in mild morning light.The mild morning light creates a pleasant atmosphere in my opinion.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A QI, yes, but it doesn't stand out enough for me to consider it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is what makes the difference here. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose it's nice, but per Daniel. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DoF is too shallow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me it is special because it captures the delicacy of the young leaves, thanks to the tender light and to the shallow DoF. --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G1.jpg (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:31:19

Info Too cluttered, blurry grass blade in front of the stump, crop unnecessarily wide, distracting branches, dim lighting, average composition (Original nomination)
Delist It has encyclopedic value but I have seen much better fungus images fail to get promoted to FP. Also, the natural phenomenon depicted could be reproduced in a lab/artificial setting and so a studio shot is very much possible. -- StellarHalo (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I agree - the level of detail here does not seem like FP quality. --Peulle (talk) 22:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Low wow and sadly well below FP quality in 2020. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist +1 --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist , does not seem special. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Cayambe (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others.--Amirpashaei (talk) 05:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 045.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 00:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info I don't usually give my photos a title, but I like to call this one: "A Walk to the Moon." -- all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice scene but not extraordinary to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the concept. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Normally I would oppose a scene lacking in wow like this one but, I like the idea behind it in combination with the title you came up with --StellarHalo (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support First I thought the light was a bit boring, but looking at it in detail and following the trail to the moon convinced me. --Aristeas (

talk) 09:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Per Poco. It is a nice scene, but is missing something extra to make it "wow" for me. --Domob (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Very good but not IMO an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose little wow - Benh (talk) 16:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019W3046 - Львів.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by Myroslav Vydrak - uploaded by Myroslav Vydrak - nominated by Мирослав Видрак -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can see that it must have been very pleasant to be there in that weather, but I don't see what I consider an unusually great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very beautiful photograph with nice colours but a) it needs a perspective correction and b) I too am not quite sold on the composition - the path takes up too much of the frame for me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Lack of sharpness: there is a small sharp focal plane and it seems quite arbitrary, as a result it seems that almost nothing is in focus. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image has the elements of a lot of great autumn photos, but without actually being one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao.--Amirpashaei (talk) 05:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сурок черношапочный (камчатский).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 10:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info created and uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info This picture was nominated as part of a set- nomination "Black-capped marmots" and received 6 support before I withdrew this nomination due to Charlesjsharp remarks. --KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a nice composition of an adult with a juvenile, but not sharp enough for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good picture, but not sharp enough. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my vote on the original nomination. Wrt sharpness, I don't think it's a focus issue, it's just perhaps a bit too little sharpness has been applied to it in processing. But that is easily fixed, and I'd rather an undersharpened JPEG than an oversharpened one. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my remark on the set. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good picture, but.... JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The quality is not the best for the exemplar in the back (given that the first one is on focus) but hey, it's a 600 mm shot and the compo is one of the best we have in that FP category Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)

Mossy leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus sikorae), featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Hiding
Revealing itself

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Gekkonidae (Geckos)
Info The mossy leaf-tailed gecko has developed an amazing camouflage system. It has irregular flaps of skin (known as a dermal flap) that run along its body so that it can press itself against a tree branch or trunk and disappear. The flaps mean that it doesn’t throw a shadow. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is really fascinating. -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really thought for a minute that you nominated a branch without a gecko and another branch with a gecko until I read the description and saw it. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support These has to be in a set! --Cart (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment wow, can you still do something about the frame overlapping issue on the far left of the hiding image? Poco a poco (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ For now, at least I deserve an answer why editing the left part of the left picture wouldn't be posible. The quality issues are very obvious and although this set is among the best I can think of, the quality of the left image can and should be improved Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Sorry Poco a poco, I didn't notice your comments which are spot on. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you did, but you didn't address the issue I pointed out. I just added a note (in the pic page not in the nom page as the note button is not available) Poco a poco (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
THat's the problem with camouflage. Can't see the errors. Hopefully now sorted Poco a poco. Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That was a really improvement, thanks Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Seems that what I took for a mouth was not. Twice camouflaged animal, then, once by nature and once by {{Retouched}} -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, there are still errors, on the twig upper right side, and on the tip of the light green leaf over the neck. The leaf behind the twig also looks cloned -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent set, just the way to do photos of camouflaged animals. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. So cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Gorgeous illustration of camouflage in nature. Each image is fine as FP, but the set increases the value of the pair. Imagine only one picture captured in this place, we would love to see the other one. The fact we've got both clearly adds an extra documenting value. The animal itself seems rare enough and visually special to boost the candidature. Still two remarks: 1) Do you know the template {{otherversion|File:example.jpg}} you can add in the description pages? 2) Very poor categorization. I would expect at least something related to the notion of camouflage, which seems essential here -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks, though the template doesn’t seem to work very well. I edited Camouflage on Wikipedia, but the edit was reverted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It works well IMO but is supposed to be placed in the specified section Fixed. And I've learnt something with your category added -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support One of the best animal camouflage images I have seen on here --StellarHalo (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support wooowowowowowowwww - Benh (talk) 06:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am groot - Benh (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support/ Almost ideal for set nominating. Left part of Hiding a bit unsharp. --KSK (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A shame that the left part of the hiding is not perfect but a lot of wow. Never seen the animal before.--Ermell (talk) 07:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely cool! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent set! --GRDN711 (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How are sets handled by POTY? It would be really sad this doesn't make it to POTY candidates. - Benh (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benh, sets do count for POTY, but we vote on the set as a whole rather than the pictures individually. Example here - see the '1/8' above the picture and the navigation tools to scroll through the pictures in the set. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sets do count in POTY, but if, I remember correctly, are poorly displayed for voting - I think only one image is displayed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One image at a time is displayed. It's not obvious at all it is a set. I hope this doesn't compromise this set's chances. - Benh (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As well as notifying this page that POTY has started, the organizers could improve the layout to alert voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, if in POTY 2020 the interface looks the same like for the last edition, this set will not be one of the finalist. But we have similar issues with spherical panos, most of the viewers don't understand them and will not vote for them the way they are displayed...Poco a poco (talk) 08:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Podzemnik. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh.--iMahesh (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment no access to original files for two more days Basile Morin. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Gekkonidae (Geckos)

File:Crucibulum laeve - Vieux-Sautour2.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 10:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Agaricales_(Gilled_Mushrooms)
Info created by Gilles San Martin - uploaded & nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question The description doesn't say if this is a natural background. See note. It would be nice to know. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overall a nice focus stack but the image quality doesnt quite match up to our best and also a little dark. Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per/ Cmao20 JukoFF (talk) 22:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017-02-02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info: With navigation light mast lowered for bridges, sea-going tugboat April Moran, heads down the Elizabeth River at dusk off Norfolk, Virginia, USA. - created - uploaded - nominated by GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The light in this pic is really beautiful, but I can't help feeling the focus has been missed, it doesn't seem quite sharp. But I don't want to oppose such a lovely scene. Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice light and mood, but unfortunately not sharp enough and though the lowered navigation light mast (not an antenna) has some educational value, it spoils the contour of the boat a bit. Better to catch it on the other side of the bridge. --Cart (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @W.carter: @Cmao20: @Fischer.H: Thank you, Cart, for the more specific terminology. I have changed “antenna” to “navigation light mast” in all parts of the image description.

Make a better image with the mast up? - I have no control over the boat; only my camera and the recognition of subject and light. I mentioned this mast because I wanted viewers to understand that is normal for it to be in the down position when this tug is working in this part of the river. I don’t feel it detracts.

Of course, there is always a story... The April Moran is already past all the bridges upriver to the left and is heading out towards the Atlantic. The winter sun was setting in the late afternoon providing that lovely liquid light. The historic Norfolk skyline, including church spires, was in the background and my reflector was behind me. That reflector happened to be an eight-story, all-white office building that helped fill in the shadow side of the boat. I walked up to the dock about a minute before the April Moran came by.

Have re-processed the image to sharpen slightly. Hopefully, this may change minds. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying, but it is still not sharp enough for me. I think unfortunately it is a focus issue rather than simply being undersharpened, so there may not be a lot that can be done about it. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just a well-done but unexceptional picture of a tugboat. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chichester Cathedral Choir, West Sussex, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:29:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom
Info Chichester Cathedral is one of the 26 medieval cathedrals of England. Although it isn't the largest, its architecture is seen by critics as one of the finest examples of the period; it also has the distinction of being the only medieval English cathedral visible from the sea. There are currently no FPs from this cathedral, but Diliff has several shots on Commons, and this shot of the choir seems the best of the series. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Unfortunately not completely symmetrical, but I think it's the corridor's problem rather than the photographer's. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, most English cathedrals are not perfectly symmetrical. See Ripon Cathedral for an example that just gets odder the more you look at it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nothing is perfectly synmetrical --Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing that there are still not-yet-nominated FPs from David after all these years. I hope he and his family are doing well, and that he comes back some time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. Has he really been gone that long? It feels like he was here last year still. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo. Buidhe (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Andrei (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom

File:Vaste Judaspenning (Lunaria rediviva) 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 17:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Brassicaceae
Info Pleasantly scented flowers of a Lunaria rediviva. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Bijay chaurasia (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this one is one of our finest images and the shot is easy, not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a great composition to me, though nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco a Poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd borrow what Daniel said a few pictures ago (at the Fagus image) - good as a QI, but not really a FP to me. --GeXeS (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Brassicaceae

File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 16:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The nice clock on the tower is interesting enough to feature, though I must say I wish it didn't have such a boring building behind it. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Constructed in 1931, the Municipal Savings Bank is an iconic example of the German Modernist architecture. Designed by Henrich Rump, the winning project was in line with the modernist style and innovative urban design of Max Berg, creator of the Centennial Hall (UNESCO site). Located in the middle of the Old Town Square, next to Baroque and Renaissance houses, it symbolizes not only power of Silesian economy, but the futuristic vision and ambitions of the city. --Andrei (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'm sure it's an important building, but the architecture really doesn't appeal to me. I'm not a fan of modernism overall to be honest. The picture is still good though. Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very eye-catching, very nice colors. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Christian. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Christian, and IMHO the combination of the tower with the bank is interesting because it combines two very different architecture styles. --Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this weren't a runaway success, I would oppose, somewhat per Cmao20. It's not that the bank is not a good building; it's that it distracts the eye from the right side of the clocktower without anything balancing it out on the left side. There's even somewhat of an extension of the right-heaviness in the background. This is a very technically good photo, though, with beautiful light and pleasant mist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland

File:Maroc Marrakech Jemaa-el-Fna Luc Viatour.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jemaa el-Fnaa is a square and market place in Marrakesh's medina quarter (old city). It remains the main square of Marrakesh, used by locals and tourists.

Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Editor-1
Support -- Editor-1 (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A snapshot with lots of posterization, and please add the correct gallery. Find it by looking at COM:FP, but somewhere in it will be "Pictures" and "#Morocco". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unbalanced composition with a bright, empty sky taking up too much space. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can crop the sky easily by using CropTool--Editor-1 (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Pretty but doesn't add up to more than a snapshot to me with the obvious tilt, blown-out featureless sky, and blurry ledge in the bottom left corner. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gsengscharte 20200622.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 10:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Styria
Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This picture does not have an immediate "wow" for me, but looking at it closer, one first notices the natural side with the rocks, and only later how there are nine (!) way markings leading the hiker and the eye to the top. --Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, I see what you're going for. Maybe a little low on the wow but overall I think it's unusual and interesting enough to feature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and unusual. Buidhe (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sufficiently intesting to me I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An example for redundance --Llez (talk) 06:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isojärvi panorama 3.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
Info There are 187,888 lakes, about 509,800 summer cottages, and estimated 3,2 million saunas in Finland. The image depicts a common summer day view over a lake in Finland, in this case the photo is taken from my summer cottage. The lake is called Isojärvi, and it is the 97. largest lake in Finland. The day was beautiful, and the sunset was equally stunning. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice reflections and I like the wider crop, but it seems oversharpened to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cmao20, it's not well processed and a bit tilted. I also find the motif a bit average. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per W.carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To elaborate on Cart's critique, as some of you may know I spend a lot of my time on Commons, when I'm not here, working on categorization, and I've made a particular thing out of the "Water reflections of ... in ..." subcategories. As such, I've seen a lot of pictures of clouds reflected in lakes near leafy islands, especially in Scandinavia. And technical issues aside, this just doesn't stand out to me from the rest of them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination —kallerna (talk) 17:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gebänderte Prachtlibelle auf Pusteblume am NSG Gülper See.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:03:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Calopterygidae_(Demoiselles)
Info created - uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a patch on the technical quality of this photographer's exisiting FP of this species Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very nice compo and sharp everywhere apart from the thorax, therefore a weak oppose Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that some parts are sharper than others but this is still a good, high-resolution, well-composed macro shot. The composition is IMO sufficiently different from the other one Charles links to for it to be worth featuring. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the wing here has more detail than the other FP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO sufficiently different from the exisiting FP, here the nice background colours and the dandelion (?) add much to the ‘wow’. --Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support But where are the Metadata gone? --Llez (talk) 06:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Calopterygidae_(Demoiselles)

File:Rhacophorus kio.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family_:_Rhacophoridae_(Shrub_Frogs)
Info created - uploaded by Rushenb - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Closed eyes don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support DoF is a tiny bit shallow but still a really nice capture. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. Closed eye is OK for me. Is the frog asleep? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry, the eyes are wide open. Only the pupils are contracted, caused by light (see also here and here) --Llez (talk) 06:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians#Family_:_Rhacophoridae_(Shrub_Frogs)

File:Losar-Kunzum Road Jun18 D72 7836.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 10:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Scenic beauty showing the barren, high-altitude semi-desert of Spiti Tagooty (talk) 10:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image doesn't meet the minimum quality requirements, almost everywhere unsharp and blurry, lots of spots in the sky. --Basotxerri (talk) 11:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree this is a scenic view but it is sadly out of focus. Unfortunately I can't really find any area that's sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, and a good FPX candidate. Tagooty, you might want to check out COM:Photo critiques for some suggestions and then try COM:QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: per all the !votes above

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tagooty (talk) 06:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá 02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 03:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Apidae_(Bumble_Bees,_Honey_Bees,_Carpenter_Bees,_Cuckoo_Bees,_Orchid_Bees,_and_Stingless_Bees) (I don't know. Animal or plant?)
Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly one of my favorite Wilfredo's pictures. I just love this one! -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please fix the gallery. It is you, the nominator, who decides how you want to nominate this. Don't put that on someone else. --Cart (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are you sure it is Apis melifera? I don't think so. And I see no pollen basket. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it's a bumblebee, hard to id with this angle. --Ivar (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support on the ID being confimed properly. We shouldn't promote it if there is doubt as to whether the ID is correct - but I agree with the nominator, it's a really nice photo. Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose everything is very usual. JukoFF (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Way too average. Also, most of the image is out of focus --StellarHalo (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Browning Range during winter sunrise, Lake Kaniere Scenic Reserve, West Coast, New Zealand.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 01:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by me. It's Browning Range during sunrise. -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Very nice, but a shame that the ridge is so close to the bottom edge at the center right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit boring composition but I can't say no to this gorgeous light - Benh (talk) 06:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh. Cmao20 (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Benh and too hazy too me, also agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hazy and per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8893.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 13:59:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's a great new take on the old manhole theme, and I would gladly have supported if the flowers were not fused into yellow and white blobs. I think that could have been avoided. Do you think you could try a new shot? Perhaps a two shot stack of some kind. --Cart (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry. I can't take another shot. The area is closed. Perhaps my next visit is end of September or in spring. May there are other flowers. I'll have a look. --XRay ^talk 16:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Unfortunately overexposed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely a good compositional idea, but Oppose per Cart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the idea very much and the quality is fine for me, seems sharp and I don't think the issue with the flowers is very important. My support is only weak because I don't think the subject itself is outstanding. I've seen manhole covers that are much more ornate and beautiful than this (here are a few beautiful ones on an external site) and as good as this shot is, the subject lacks the craftsmanship and elegance of some examples I've seen, so it doesn't really fill me with amazement. Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree there are more special manhole covers, but what makes this picture particular IMO is the grass and flowers around. In one case, creativity is behind the product, in the other it is behind the camera -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I do quite like your argument here and also below about the optimism of nature colonising difficult terrain. It's certainly a different way to think about it. In any case I did support this picture though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per others --Llez (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others JukoFF (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cart --StellarHalo (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 17:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me too, a funny shot, for a change Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Forgiving the technical flaws (blown highlights). Striking composition with a green circle in a square and optimistic design showing how ambitious nature is to colonize hostile territories 🌼 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gurung child at Upper Sinuwa during Annapurna Base camp trek in a Tea house-2972.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:40:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Children
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you indicate on the file page that you have parental/guardian permission to use this image, please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: Yes, i can and do have a permission to use this child's portrait. I asked his father about this photo and doesn't have any problem. But is there any template to indicate Parental Permission --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bijay. There probably is, someone else might help? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Charlesjsharp: , Or Is it OK to write in description section that this user have permission to use this photo in Commons--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template we have is {{Consent}}. If you use that and write about the father's permission in the description, that's enough. --Cart (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Why did you applied the vignetting and looking at it I have the impression that the use of the 25 mm so close to the head and this being tilted results in a deformation of the head. I don't think that a wide angle lens is usually a good choice por portrait shots Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown highlights on the shirt collar, leading to plain white areas. Incidentally, also over-processed for my taste (artificial vignetting) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Unremarkable image poorly processed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img62 Ortaköy Mosque.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
Info Dome interior of the Ortaköy Mosque, Istanbul ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting perspective. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 14:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition.--iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO very beautiful and the perspective is just right here. Cmao20 (talk) 18:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Symmetry is not perfect, the image is tilted in cccw direction (following the vertical chain in the very middle) and noise level is just acceptable, but the motif is very nice --Poco a poco (talk) 18:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question cccw?

Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice composition.--Amirpashaei (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really exciting perspective. --Aristeas (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per King of Hearts. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 17:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Turkey

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 16:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors
Info Saint Christopher at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Kefermarkt, Upper Austria. Anonymous master (called Master of the Kefermarkt Altarpiece), around 1497. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anonymous, but stunning craftsmanship, captured well. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think you have got just the right composition so that we get a sense of how the alterpiece actually looks. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I certainly respect this photo, but I find the original composition that shows St. Christopher's entire body (as shown in this photo of the whole winged altar) more satisfying. Did you consider doing a taller crop that showed his whole body? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info@Ikan Kekek: I am especially interested in the relaton between the two persons, which for me is shown best here --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Shows the three-dimensional quality of the artwork very well. --Aristeas (talk) 15:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The pose is rather wooden, though . Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors

File:Pergola - Point Pelee National Park.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 18:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info: A pergola along the Marsh Boardwalk, Point Pelee National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I could quibble about the image quality a little, but the shadows make this a really outstanding composition, well done. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the shadows are the main point here, I'm glad you noticed :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support A special kind of mirroring --Llez (talk) 08:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Doesn't work for me with this vanishing point targeting an uninteresting guardrail -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If I may. The point of the image is the uniform lattice of the shadows. A small crop, top and bottom would give the photo a better impact. If you don't see exactly where the lattice begins, you get that infinity feeling. The bench will be cut, but that is secondary in this image IMO. See note. --Cart (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done: cropped. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! :-) Support --Cart (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose bad geometry. JukoFF (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If one is really into Lobachevskian geometry, perhaps. Can't see what's wrong with it otherwise... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The center square is ideal, but the top rungs are not parallel). But this is not the point, the point is that there is no enceclopedicity, what should this image illustrate on Wikipedia *? JukoFF (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You keep giving this reason for opposing things here and at QIC, and I wish you'd stop. First of all, you have no idea what might be used on Wikipedia, but second, this is not Wikipedia and this is not FPC on any of the Wikipedias. You think that Commons is only about encyclopedic illustrations, not about photography in any other way? Where in the world do you get that idea from? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I see what you were thinking but I think the image is trying to do too much. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this, and I don't find it a particularly complicated form, but I do find it satisfying. And for JukoFF, I could easily see this being used on Wikipedia as a good example of light and shadow in photography, but more importantly, I could see it being used on another page on photography, -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel --StellarHalo (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez lagarto diamante (Synodus synodus), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 44.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Aulopiformes_(Grinners)
Info Diamond lizardfish (Synodus synodus) found in Madeira, Portugal. This species has typically a length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in) and lives in the Atlantic Ocean, usually between 2 metres (6.6 ft) and 35 metres (115 ft) deep, in this case found at the bottom of a reef area 12 metres (39 ft) deep. There are no FPs of this family (and I just uploaded the first 2 QIs). c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. DoF is shallow but still great considering technical challenges and in some ways I think it actually helps the photo to have only the head in focus. Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merging background. JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
JukoFF: what do you mean with "merging background"? too bussy? what kind of background do you expect then here? Poco a poco (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice face, natural background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only the animal's head is sharp. The rest are not. That is not enough for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Famberhorst: and can you explain me how to get a shot with at least f/11 (too accomplish your demand) or smaller with poor lighting condition of a living animal underwater? Just curious, this is a different world than shooting flowers in a meadow --Poco a poco (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I can't. I don't have to be able to. I notice the blur and I only give my opinion! In any case, you did a much better job with your photo File: Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 49.jpg. PS. what's wrong with my world of flowers and plants? --Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Famberhorst:Nothing, but asking for a sharp fish from this POV from the head to the tail is absurd. That shows that you don't understand the challenge of this kind of shot. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the answer wasn't respectful. I take it back. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 12:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I would prefer if the rest of the image is sharper but the face alone is impressive especially at this angle. StellarHalo (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laughing boy at golden hour.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2020 at 00:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Laughter sparkling like his t-shirt :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support He looks genuinely happy. Does his family have a poster of this? :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One will have for sure on request. Now they've been scrutinizing an XL postcard for about twenty months :-) Agree, thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one of the best examples of this kind of photo I've seen here. These photos don't normally have much interest for me but this one is good enough to support. Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now this is a portrait of a child that works ... Daniel Case (talk) 14:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Children

File:A large cabbage.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:15:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Brassicaceae
Info created & uploaded by Subhrajyoti07 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no novelty. JukoFF (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and colors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Have gone back and forth on this one but I don't think the composition is really outstanding for FP, although the image quality is quite good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it was just the cabbage and its bed it might work, but the flowers make it too random. Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I like the combination of green and purple, complementary colors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I understand the objections, but have to confess that I really like it; the combination with the flowers is strange, but refreshing ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of an interance of aine iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2020 at 05:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Note that there is some noise in the smooth areas, probably from sharpening; consider using a bit of masking on the sharpening panel so you don't sharpen the noise. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 07:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a bit noisier than some of your photos (was the light a little difficult?) but it is 88mpx and when downsized to half-size the noise is almost invisible. The truth is that we are getting spoiled by the high quality of your work. But this one is still an obvious FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Cmao.I glad to my judges have sharp eyes. for some reason I selected iso on 320 for previous picture and forgot it to correct that on this picture. eventually I captured this picture with iso 320. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per others. Good at 60% for me. That said, this is not one of your best, so if you have better ones, nominate those. There will start to be some attrition in voting if you post the same kinds of subjects every week. Do you have any great photos of other types of Iranian motifs, or only ceilings? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr. Kekek. I will trip to Kashan tomorrow for 4 days. I will try to capture pictures different from shrine. --Amirpashaei (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a chance visit the Zorastarian temple at روستای کله کاشان and take some great pictures for us. I find the Zoroastrian religion and their ancient customs very interesting. --Gnosis (talk) 04:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggest Mr Gnosis. I saw your message tonight. I photographed the Nushabad underground city and captured good pictures that didn't captured before.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 21:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Measured support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me noise is information and should never be removed. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File:Historisches Hammerwerk am Blautopf-Abfluss.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created & uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice enough scene but to me, somehow the "zooming effect" that the lens makes here is at odds with this very peaceful and tranquil landscape. That effect is better in more action-y photos. --Cart (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty enough for FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition does not work for me, the main object (the building) is at the side and cropped. Furthermore, there are some CAs and perspective issues. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While I have no issues with the composition, it perhaps does aggravate the unsharpness that's too prevalent in the image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not the best and per Uoaei1, 15 mm definitely work here, but the image format doesn't Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wetland - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 11.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A composition of white, blue, and green; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, but please mention the Lemna in the description and categories. When there is this much of it in the photo, it should be in the info as well. A {{Panorama}} template with info would hurt either. --Cart (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks --Llez (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, very weak composition. JukoFF (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very high quality, but not a compelling composition for me as most of the center is blank. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is not blank, it is completely filled with Lemna minor (common duckweed), please zoom in to see the details, especially in the foreground --Llez (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - When I talk about composition, I mean from a global perspective it is blank - it doesn't lead my eye anywhere, while the interesting bits are all on the periphery. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King --StellarHalo (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alp Dado Sura boven Breil-Brigels. (actm) 05.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2020 at 15:11:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Windows
Info Interesting textures and shades in the wood of a window shutter in an old sky cabin.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think I nominated a similar picture by you once, but this one is better. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great texture. Seven Pandas (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It takes a good eye to spot this as a good motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 07:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of this simpler picture I took. Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Also nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Love it! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Windows

File:Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Lemuridae (Lemurs)
Info This lemur is on the front cover of Issue Four of my free magazine (read online) or download pdf. This month I have amazing photos from Llez, Archaeodontosaurus, Cayambe, Rhododendrites, Wilfredor and Jkadavoor. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't resist lemurs since they, apparently, can't resist me. I visited a park with lemurs once and we were told to strictly not touch the lemurs. No one had told the lemurs the same. I was the tallest in the group and the lemurs took turns jumping down and perching on my head. Spent most of that visit with a "lemur hat". ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I always appreciate for wildlife images but this one is not at the level of others. Main issues here are the leaf in front of the face, the tilt (see the water level) and the noise level --Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a good shot no more. JukoFF (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution is not your highest but overall this still makes it to FP. Obviously this is an endangered species and I am happier to make allowances because of that. The quality is good overall despite a bit of noise and the angle and composition are really good, showing the whole animal very well. Definitely one of the best shots of the species on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. Nice composition, facial expression and shape of its tail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too noisy and too low resolution. The grass spoils a bit. Looking at the first version, the quality had no real FP potential (although the reprocess is better). Light very average -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Ivar (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I appreciate the current processing, and the image is overall eye-catching. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't help but like it after Cart's story. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Lemuridae (Lemurs)

File:Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation at Rågårdsdal.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
Info Or... Welcome to the floating forests of Pandora!

Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation in Åbyfjorden at Rågårdsdal, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. Most of the jellies are moon jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) and lion's mane jellyfish (Cyanea capillata). When these gatherings occur, the lion's manes go into a bit of a feeding frenzy capturing and eating moon jellies. The bigger lion's manes will capture smaller moon jellies with their tentacles and drag them up into their mouths. Smaller lion's manes will attach themselves to a moon jelly and eat. They seem to prefer eating the moon jellies from the underside. Some of the moon jellies in this photo are tattered and flaccid after having been partially eaten by lion's manes, others have circular marks from the lion's manes feeding. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noise for me, and I find the reflections more disturbing than adding to the picture.--Peulle (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the shadow spoils everything. JukoFF (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good abstract work. I think it succeeds mainly because of its sheer uniqueness, I have never seen anything quite like it. Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disturbing reflections and the composition doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile, but if you crop out most of the cloud reflections, it might work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao—absolutely unique Buidhe (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support more for the jellyfishes. Nice shot! - Benh (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. I might support without the cloud reflections. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another Cocteau Twins cover-style Cart image ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like an exciting fantasy world to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For me too. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe Commons is not the right venue for this, but there is some special kind of beauty in this. Somehow reminds me of hydro dipping for some reason. --El Grafo (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 00:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Austria
Info created & uploaded by User:Isiwal - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the combination of regularity and irregularity in this picture, the clouds and the striking contrasts of light and shadow, and the strikingly colorful tree on the right in a less colorful context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice find. Cmao20 (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and very interesting detail. Is it a comet or an airplane between the clouds? --XRay ^talk 07:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be surprised if a comet is so bright as to be seen in daylight :) - Benh (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Austria

File:Anas platyrhynchos - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 05.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 11:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and image quality look fine to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A duck ducking down in duckweed. Cute. Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The area between eye and peak looks awkward, probably it was darker and has been lighten up a bit, the result doesn't look realistic. Quality otherwise is good and the green layer nice but at the end of the day a duck in a center of an image, no dynamic there, sorry. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Concerning the area betwen eye and peak: It is the green reflection of the duckweed. --Llez (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A bit boring and I prefer a more vividly-colored duck but per Daniel. --StellarHalo (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas

File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 07:12:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed and sad. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The headstones in the back are not in focus Buidhe (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but is there any reason they have to be? IMO there's nothing wrong with a picture focussing only on the ones nearest the camera. Aristeas has gone for a similar approach in this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I would say that it adds depth to the photo --Andrei (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Cmao20 (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Composition. The other FP has a nice way of drawing the viewer's eyes to the center, but this one has too many prominent shapes near the far edges, which is distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The fungi on the stones, their slightly skewed stance, the low light and the shallow DoF combine to reinforce an overarching theme of the slow fade of the dead from the consciousness of the living, the fate that awaits us all: "One by one they were all becoming shades. Better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some passion, than fade and wither dismally with age." Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am late, but thank you, Andrei, for nominating, and all of you for your comments, both for positive and for critical ones. --Aristeas (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King --StellarHalo (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:Hazel MacKaye and dog by Harris & Ewing.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Harris & Ewing - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is probably my favourite of all the portraits I've done of notable people. Just something about the genuine smile and choosing to be photographed with her dog. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there something wrong with the top half of her hair? Seems too light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Black and white is kind of a weird medium. Hair colours that aren't either fairly near black or fairly near blond can come out a bit strange. I think it's just a relatively light brown (or possibly red) hair, with sun shining on it. Compare https://www.loc.gov/item/mnwp000122/ (another image, same photography session), the very wild hair of https://www.loc.gov/resource/mnwp.275005/ and especially https://www.loc.gov/resource/agc.7a17749/ In short, it's odd, but it seems to be reasonably accurate. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and lovely portrait. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Landscape of Luang Prabang with a temporary wooden footbridge.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info A really nice landscape from Basile Morin, and the composition is very different from all his other Laotian FPs. created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Related to File:Working at the consolidation of a wooden footbridge in Luang Prabang - 1 (Side view).jpg but significantly different, and beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing photo! Buidhe (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Laos + nice light = Support - Benh (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Andrei (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That bridge has indeed wow-factor but to me it doesn't work in this composition, there are too many other elements in the compo. Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me the bridge is a complementary diagonal to the river banks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing spectacular here Seven Pandas (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination. I like this wooden footbridge and the long boats in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 15:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It's a good image; just not enough wow. Agree with Poco. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For me the wow is in the dramatic sky, the contrast between the bridge and the landscape, and the nice composition which conforms neatly to the rule of thirds. But of course people are entitled to disagree Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Eurasian tree sparrows feeding from the hand in Ueno Park, Tokyo, Japan.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 01:21:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Sparrows)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 07:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different. Cmao20 (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I wish the female were also facing the camera, but Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find the arm dominating and distracting from the birds. Also per Ikan, would have liked to see female front to camera. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is there a companion image Ikan Kekek that shows the one looking away is a female? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sparrows I'm most familiar with are house sparrows, as there are many of them in New York, and by analogy, I felt confident that the sparrow on the left was a male and the one on the right was a female, based on their feathers (and moreover, that they were probably a couple). It would be interesting if you had reason to believe I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think that you can assume hand-fed birds might be a couple (most unlikely) and I'm not aware you can tell male and female apart. Not like house sparrows. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per GRDN711. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 08:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, that results in less detail of the birds, which is an issue to me Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711 StellarHalo (talk) 14:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chayotes in black and white.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 00:05:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMO a good composition, but the DoF should be better. --XRay ^talk 07:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tomascastelazo, I see that all that time and effort I spent teaching you categorization and galleries was a total waste of time since you continue to take the easy path and let other people fix things. I've fixed the galleries but that will be the last time I sort out your noms. --Cart (talk) 16:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice textures, but not that sharp and the composition isn't doing much for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan, also B&W doesn't work for me. Buidhe (talk) 05:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 06:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Also per others. --Peulle (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; an idea with a lot of potential that still has a lot of potential. Daniel Case (talk) 16:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, have thought about this one a lot but I agree with Ikan here. Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 9.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 04:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 07:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is a bit flat but I like the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
very weak support per Cmao. I considered opposing, but nice composition. - Benh (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

File:Kinabayo Festival Showdown.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 09:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rio Ubatay - uploaded by Rio Ubatay - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quite a lot of wow but IMO not very sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Cmao. The motion-blurred hands we can't do anything about, and shouldn't, but the faces could have been sharper. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Danu Widjajanto (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:56:11

Info The biggest problems are that the crop removes people from the image - which I believe makes much of the description inaccurate - and it turns a semi-transparent flag (expected for thin fabric seen against a bright sky) into a solid flag, which looks really unnatural. I just don't think this is a good example of our work. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If you compare to this, only one person was cropped out. I also see no problems with the flag. --Andrei (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Adam. Buidhe (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist because of the destructive crop. Historical photos should be restored faithfully. Plus, the guy on the left of the original photo looks like an important person. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others --StellarHalo (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 07:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist No need to make such strange alterations to an historical photo. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Adam. --Gnosis (talk) 04:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist +1 --El Grafo (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist +1. --Peulle (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 16:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aina-kari near Zarih of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 06:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful as always. I notice in your Exif data, you don't include the model of your camera. I think people would be interested to know what camera you are using. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Thanks Mr Kekek. I use fujifilm GFX 50R camera. because of Panorama and HDR techniques, some of my pictures exif data are removed.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That info should be on the file page, not here. I've added the Template:Photo Information to the page, you can fill in information that way if the exif is lost. I've also fixed the links to wiki-pages in the description for you. --Cart (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very easy to circumvent this: just c+p the edited picture on the original picture, and save it as its copy. --A.Savin 11:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Miss Carter. I wrote the exif data.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Savin. I will try this method.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely image. Although all the reflections does make me somewhat wish for a stereoscopic view. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Thanks Mr Cuerden. Stereoscopic view is a main purpose of building Muqarnas . the purpose in the Āina kāri is showing Glamor and glitter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean as in a 3D view, so that you can tell the shapes of the complex, reflective structures. Obviously, that's not happening. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understood. If we have light and shadow in a picture we have 3D view too. but in Āina kāri art you just see light's reflection and there is no shadow. because that reason you don't see the shape not even in reality and with your eyes.--Amirpashaei (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Another good one. Seems like a tremendously unusual place with all that green. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For further study, see Green in Islam. --Gnosis (talk) 04:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Absolutamente si --Wilfredor (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I think the top half could have a little, little bit more contrast for better impact. -- Cart (talk) 10:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to go far from original picture. but I agree with you in more contrast Miss Carter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I kind of would like to see more at the bottom (cropped chandalier) but anyhow, great Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Silva. I will shot from floor to the ceiling and from top to floor next time.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 12:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great image of this great shrine. --Aristeas (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What minty-fresh breath looks like ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support In my own experience, one of the hardest pictures to take are from mirrored rooms with reflections coming from ALL sides. Amir did a great job here, nicely done. --Gnosis (talk) 04:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is a certain restlessness in the whole picture. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 14:11:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 14:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For once I think the people add to rather than detract from this scene. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good documentation of everyday life, but no element stands out to give me that wow-feeling like in for example File:Ana rosa metro station, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg with its light and crispness. Here everything is just uniform. Also wonder why the photo isn't symmetrically cropped on the right side when everything else is so centered. --Cart (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

if I cut the right I run the risk that the cut is too close to the train door, regarding the other photo it is really a art work, thanks. I'm going to try to make another cut to see what you think --Wilfredor (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This composition doesn't work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose I was going to support because I do like both the framing effect of the lampposts and the vaulted ceiling (sort of reminds me of Milan's Stazione Centrale) but then I saw the cropped sign at the left. With a little more space at the sides I think this might work. Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The slight lack of symmetry is unfortunate, but otherwise a good composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt cut edit

Info Thanks Cart for your recomendation. I preffer this cut --Wilfredor (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Wilfredor but I prefer the original cut. The original worked well because the lampposts acted like a framing device, but without them it seems a bit like just a random photo of a train station. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This composition does work for me, but so far, I'm the only one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao --Cvmontuy (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 16:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oakmoss at Myrstigen 3.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 16:41:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Parmeliaceae
Info As is evident by the exif, no flash was used, only the low strong spring sun that hit this tuft just right. I tried to find it a week later when buds had started to emerge to see if I could identify the tree, but by then I couldn't find this branch since they had done some landscape maintenance in the area. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 07:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have liked to take this picture myself.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Parmeliaceae

File:Cyphotilapia frontosa - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 12:39:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose flash and unsharp. - Benh (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Much sharper than some of the fish photos of others recently promoted --Llez (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - U take them in zoos. They are controlled and easy environments. - Benh (talk) 15:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Are you shure? Did you ever try it? It is not so easy as you think: the direction of the artificial ligth, the occurence of blue borders, the background, the reflexions of the aquarium glass and so on. If it is so easy as you say, why don't we have not more aquarium photos in acceptable quality on Commons? --Llez (talk) 20:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'd venture in to say "because it's a boring setting for shooting". I have tried, and stopped. no fun for me. - Benh (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual fish, and sharp enough for me per Llez. Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Benh. --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, also per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theyyam at peeleri vayanaattukulavan kaavu 03.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 08:41:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info--Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala, India. Theyyam is a living cult with several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. The performers of Theyyam belong to folk communities. Theyyam is mixture of folk arts like folk painting, folk song, folk dance etc.

-- created by, uploaded by, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is a good photo of cultural heritage. It works well because you can see the intent expression of the man concentrating on his task. There are a few quibbles about image quality but overall this seems like an FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The subject is FP-worthy but I'm not convinced by the crop, special at the bottom, the noise/detail level and the cluttered background, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree poco Seven Pandas (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background, per Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually feel the background more than adds to this image. To me it also makes it more authentic. Also I don't think that pixel level sharpness should be a requirement for a 15mpx nighttime image. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco a Poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vishnumoorthi theyyam at Muzhappilangad 9.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 14:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
Info-Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala, India. Theyyam is a living cult with several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. Theyyam is mixture of folk arts like folk painting, folk song, folk dance etc. Colors used for make-up and costumes are natural colors.

created, uploaded, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice cultural picture but IMO too blurry to be FP and it bothers me that it is so asymmetrical. You also need to remember to add a gallery. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My focus is on face painting.Shagil Kannur (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. Certainly interesting, but not a great composition. Also, as he says, add a gallery. When you don't, you create work for someone else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maragota (Labrus bergylta), isla de Mouro, Santander, España, 2019-08-15, DD 55.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2020 at 20:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Labridae_(Wrasses)
Info Ballan wrasse (Labrus bergylta), Mouro Island, Santander, Spain. We have no FPs of this family and of the whole genus. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but nothing is sharp and so the image has been oversharpened to compensate. Nice colors though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems sharp for underwater photography to me, and I think we've promoted less sharp underwater photos lately (though I didn't vote for those). Pretty and well-composed, and I'm overlooking the very blurry foreground, which was probably unavoidable but could probably be partly cropped out with a balancing crop of the less unsharp background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does not really seem oversharpened to me. --StellarHalo (talk) 01:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm with KoH here - it's not one of the best images on Commons, imo.--Peulle (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The tail is very blurry, but the head is sharp enough IMO and I like the colours. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. --Ivar (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanguinaria canadensis - Durham Regional Forest.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2020 at 01:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Papaveraceae
Info: bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis); all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Skating Minister.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 22:39:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info Full title: The Reverend Robert Walker Skating on Duddingston Loch. More commonly known as The Skating Minister, this 1790s portrait painting depicts Church of Scotland minister Robert Walker ice skating on the frozen surface of freshwater Duddingston Loch. One of Scotland's best known paintings and cultural icons. attributed to Henry Raeburn - uploaded by Trzęsacz - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are white sharpening halos around the legs, background is too blurry and looks slightly tilted, there are artifacts on the ice and several stacking errors around the hat. ;-) Seriously, good reproduction of a fun painting. --Cart (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a fun painting. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

File:LithuaniaHistory.png (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2020 at 05:44:16

Info Not in SVG, quite small for a digital map, crop on the right edge too tight, the map layout is unsatisfactory with the legend box going past the bottom edge of the map creating a blank space below it, there is a narrow black space along the right edge of the map, the Baltic Sea is way too large with Scandinavia and the West Estonian archipelago left out even though they are relevant to Lithuanian history, the word "current" in the legend is missing a letter "r", Tallinn/Reval is depicted as an inland city even when it is actually a port, the Vistula river does not reach the Baltic Sea, the legend box is not rectangular at the angles, Navahrudak/Nowogródek is written over one of the borders, Krakòw is supposed to be located on the Vistula, the current Lithuanian border is badly written over its coastline even though the other borders are not, the Commonwealth border has its northern part in Livonia written out into the sea (Original nomination)
Delist No serious publication on Lithuanian history would use this map -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per StellarHalo's excellent rationale. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The last attempt do delist barely failed with 6:0 votes for delisting, thanks for giving it another try. There are even more issues: the dashed outline of the 1236 Dutchy changes color where it overlaps with the 1920-1923 republic. Source of the geodata (I suspect OSM?) used for coastlines and rivers are not noted. Historical sources for the borders are missing as well. Labels frequently intersect with line features, and they do so in an ugly way that could easily be improved by adding some haloes. I'll repeat what I wrote in 2018: "I don't think it was all that great in 2006, and it certainly is not any more today. There's nothing special in this that would make it stand out among other maps, let alone induce a"wow"-effect." --El Grafo (talk) 07:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist certainly could be useful in some Wikipedia articles, but not superlative. Buidhe (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Buidhe. Tries to do an awful lot for one map; winds up overwhelming the reader. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others and my previous vote in 2018. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 08:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 22:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orange-winged parrots (Amazona amazonica tobagensis).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2020 at 11:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info No FPs of this species. This larger subspecies is endemic to Trinidad and Tobago. Likely to be a pair, but you cannot tell. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps a bit could be cropped out from the top, but that's the photographer's choice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not as large or detailed as I would have liked but I am fine with this --StellarHalo (talk) 01:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per StellarHalo. Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support for the size (and therefore lack of detail), but still FP-worthy to me Poco a poco (talk) 07:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)

File:AJM3299.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2020 at 02:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Iran
Info created and uploaded by احمد جمالی مقدم - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It doesn't have a meaningful name. --Cart (talk) 08:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can the moon be true? --A.Savin 12:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could work. According to photoephemeris.com the moon at 99,01% rose at that location at 19:43 on the date the exif indicates. Photo taken a bit later. This photo is taken at another time of year so a full moon is higher up. Although I think that this is a composite with the "real" moon being the glare behind the left part of the tower (this shot is not fully centered) and then mixed with a shot of the moon a little higher and away from disturbing lights --Cart (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per above. Unlikely to be a real scenery. --A.Savin 13:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cart, A.Savin I think it's real. 1) the size of the moon seems to match the FOV of a 300mm on a FF. 2) I checked on photoPills (same as photoEphemeris, but more torough). The moon wasn't in the perfect alignment at that date and a bit to the right, which matches the photo. If I were to do a composite, I might as well center the monument to make it clean. - Benh (talk) 17:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking. I'll abstain anyway. Bad file name, inadequate description and I'm no fan of the compo. Cramming all those elements (streetlights, fountain, moon) into the hole doesn't work for me. A pic with the moon centered just above the tower might be better. --Cart (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a watermark to the left of the tower. See the annotation. I believe that disqualifies for FP.--G Furtado (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it does. Missed that since I was too focused on other issues, I didn't open it in full. Thanks for the tip. --Cart (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Cart. --Gnosis (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Photo has a watermark. --Cart (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Liberarte 5 (cropped).JPG edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 17:58:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
Info created by Andrea Neves - uploaded by Andrew_J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Placing the subject off-center doesn't work for me in this vertical composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Andrei (talk) 00:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nettetal, Großer De Wittsee, 2020-06 CN-26.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2020 at 23:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created & uploaded by User:Carschten - nominated by Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm calling this a picture of a bridge, but what I really like about it is the shape of the vegetation, the reflections, and the light and shadow. The bridge is an important part of that, but I toyed with calling this a natural landscape because the natural component is larger. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We now have a place for such pictures: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany. I initially had File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg in "Bridges" as well (since it's an artificial landscape), but moved it to "Other" once that became available. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. This does concentrate on the bridge more than your photo, though, so I'd like at least one more opinion before I recategorize the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very well composed photograph. Cmao20 (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood, but too much clutter. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The clutter (vegetation/reflections) is the point to me. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 07:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King --StellarHalo (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Good composition, but I wish the sharpness was better. --XRay ^talk 07:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cluttered, yes, but in a way that increases the sense of summer-afternoon tranquility. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marmolata 415.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 16:10:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
InfoView of the Marmolada from Passo Falzarego - created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too noisy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice picture but quality wise I wouldn't support it as QI, sorry. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others --Llez (talk) 06:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Irresistible scene with unacceptable noise. Daniel Case (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice landscape but sorry, the noise is definitely too much. It looks almost like something's gone wrong in the processing as your usual shots are not this noisy - any chance of fixing it in RAW? Cmao20 (talk) 01:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista desde el pico de Arieiro, Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-30, DD 147-153 PAN.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 07:06:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info View of the island of Madeira from Peak of Arieiro, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 07:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some parts on the right side are not very sharp --Llez (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Llez: do you mean whole frames or more local areas? I don't see an issue --Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- All frames could be a bit sharper, but especially the right one and to some degrees also the left one --Llez (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An epic view. Really not seeing any sharpness issue tbh. Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a superb view, but I don't think the aspect ratio does it justice. It really misses the bottom part in my view. A visible seam on the farther ridge. - Benh (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes I do know what Benh means here. I think for this reason the best of your panoramas from this site is this one. Cmao20 (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~visible cloning on the foreground (note added)~~. Please add a template, if You clone out elements of this size. --Ivar (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I improved that cloning, Ivar, I agree that it was not the best work in some spots. What template do you mean? --Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect he means the 'retouched image' template should be added. Cmao20 (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is that template really suitable if about 1% of the image has been altered? The area edited is not little in absolute terms but it's considering the resolution of the image IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 19:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Pig heads in a market.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 20:46:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Haunting, and I'm likely to support, but is there any way to make at least the nearer pig's head sharper? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support These days, we're facing an avalanche of images. Visual has been dominating the web for quite some years now and it seems like we're constantly drowning in photos. Sometimes, I'm tempted to let that flood of pictures just rush around me. But every now and then, one image stands out and I'll remember it (or bookmark it so I can go back to examine it again later). The photo above had such an effect on me and I kept wondering whether it was just the gruel scene that caught my eye. But I think it's more. In particular, I like the composition of this frame and the cold atmosphere of the depicted room. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 10:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- I think it shouldn't be here. It shows a bit of cruelty. Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking enough as is to make any aesthetic or technical concerns moot. Daniel Case (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, and to Shagil, the fact that you perceive the cruelty from the look on the pigs' eyes is what makes this photo haunting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Shagil Kannur. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Shagil Kannur and others. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Perhaps it is instructive to show this photo. But I think it's terrible to look at.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The story behind this picture is not any more cruel than that of a picture of a piece of bacon. Everybody was fine with a bunch of dead fish or chicken, so why are people getting upset about some pig heads? Simply because many of us are not used to see this any more and it is an uncomfortable reminder that your schnitzel once had legs. What's really cruel about this is that it does not show a bloody knife in the throat of an animal slaughtered at home (NSFW). What's cruel about this is that it shows the industrialization of meat production. Numbers painted on the skin, dozens of hooks for more heads, made of stainless steal, clinically clean. All of that supported by the cold industrial lighting and those little piggy eyes staring at you. Does it make you feel uncomfortable? Good, that's exactly the point of this image. It nags you, pushes you to choose: either say "this is wrong" and be a vegetarian or say "well, that's how it goes" and be a happy omnivore, but it will not let you eat your chicken nuggets and pretend they grow on trees. And that's what makes this photograph stand out among all the other candidates I've looked at today. --El Grafo (talk) 10:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well said! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --El Grafo (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 05:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo --Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food

File:Python brongersmai, Brongersma's short-tailed python.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 15:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Pythonidae_(Pythons)
Info created & uploaded by Rushenb - nominated by Ivar (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super resolution and sharp in enough places, including the head, to support. Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of DoF, too much noise reduction --Wilfredor (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not a fan of the flash / ambient lighting ratio. But it's very impressive - Benh (talk) 18:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Overall a bit dark, especially at the left side --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wilfredo and Uoaei1. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 06:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of the hose is not sharp enough for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Famberhorst --StellarHalo (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stryi-San Highland spine of the Carpathian Mountains, Ukraine.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2020 at 19:01:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by Мирослав Видрак - uploaded by Мирослав Видрак - nominated by Мирослав Видрак -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great composition and very effective use of black and white, but unfortunately the depth of field is too low (the foreground is blurry). It is a good idea to preserve the EXIF so others can see what settings you used, but if I were to guess the aperture is probably something like f/4. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I like the composition and this kind of black-and-white photographs, but it's not sharp enough. --XRay ^talk 07:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Idk why but I really don't mind the blurry foreground too much. The foreground is not the part my eye is drawn towards anyway. Nice use of black and white. Cmao20 (talk) 16:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't work for me in b/w, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 08:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Buidhe (talk) 04:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sultan Amir Ahmad Bathhouse1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 13:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oooooooh! --Cart (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo would have easily won a WLM --Wilfredor (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Wilfredor, this is truly excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: , @Wilfredor: Thanks for your kind. I can't use this photo on WLM anymore . true?--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry but not, You can't, however, if you have another picture taken a few seconds later, but you have not yet uploaded to commons, I think that it could participate --Wilfredor (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Wilfredor. I will take better pictures. --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcom, I have at least 100 images that I have been collecting throughout the year for that contest, so I am not going to make it easy for you. But remember to upload the photos during the contest period --Wilfredor (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Refreshing and different from your usual photos. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really so difficult not to over-cat? --A.Savin 20:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have problem in categorizing Mr Savin?--Amirpashaei (talk) 20:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --A.Savin 21:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can we retroactively proclaim a WLM Iran so this photo could be declared the winner? Or one of the nominator's other ones, at least. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect.--Ermell (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--B2Belgium (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What did you do with the visitors? :) When I was there it was pretty crowded Poco a poco (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

now is very hot and in non-holiday days isn't crowded.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Buidhe (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Mountain daffodils.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 14:08:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by Swift11 - uploaded by Swift11 - nominated by Swift11 -- Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautifull view however IMHO overprocessed because too much glow filter and irreal saturation, some chromatics aberrations --Wilfredor (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I took into account your comments, сhanged the artistic finish... -- Swift11 14:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Wilfredor, this is way over-processed. A shame to destroy such a nice landscape this way. --Cart (talk) 16:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, this is a real shame. The glowing misty effect and the very saturated sky are without question not natural, even though the scene is really nice. Cmao20 (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it not possible that the colour manipulation is intentional and artistic? I've seen these type of images on sale. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yes it is, but we don't have to like it, and I don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 06:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you very much, dear photo critics. You are right! Changed the artistic finish! ... -- Swift11 10:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Despite all, I like it. --A.Savin 14:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The overprocessing makes eveything look fake --StellarHalo (talk) 17:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Per Cart, a beautiful enough scene without being given the fill Instagram treatment. Also a good reminder of why the tool is called "burn" and why you should thus be careful in using it. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with all comments, but it is still nice. -- -donald- (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young grapevine leaves, tendrils and flowers 4.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 12:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Vitaceae
Info I love this little tender plant giving itself a victory shake for making it this high up. :-) -- Cart (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Cart but it's just a little too simple for me. I like the colours and the quality is clearly QI but the plant and the plain blue background are IMO not amazing. Cmao20 (talk) 01:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao, A good shot, but no wow apparent. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The special thing about this photo for me is the beautiful representation of the climbing tentacle at the top.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Famberhorst. I was having trouble deciding, but the discussion focused my mind. It is the subtlety and simplicity of the picture and the plant's stems seeming to embrace each other that help make it special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others —kallerna (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20 --StellarHalo (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks anyway! :-) --Cart (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8896.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 10:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Asteraceae_(Sunflowers)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 10:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 10:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I understand the theme of nature reclaiming this place, but the composition doesn't make a really strong impression on me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background and per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support For some reason I like it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately one of the culms is cut off. I'd prefer to see the whole culm instead of the lower, unsharp foreground. --Llez (talk) 06:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're (nearly) right. I'd seen the calm, but the calm was very long and so there would be a lot of empty space above. --XRay ^talk 06:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I see what you're going for, but it doesn't work for me. Also, only one part of the image is in focus and even that's not too detailed. At full resolution, the yellow flowers look burned (or maybe something else is going on) so you can't see the details on them. Buidhe (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I think the main problem is the distracting background, with the railings (?) at the top left. Otherwise this is a nice idea and I think you should give it a go again if you get the chance to do this kind of shot. Cmao20 (talk) 01:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. In the background you can see the gate of a bunker. It's a photograph of an ammunition depot so this small part helps to symbolize the reclaiming nature. --XRay ^talk 04:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Neutral because I think that's quite a nice idea. I guess what I really want is for that to be obvious from looking at the photo though, and I don't think it really is. Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I don't think it will become a FP. So it's better to withdraw the image. Thank you for all your reviews! --XRay ^talk 05:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /XRay ^talk 05:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bakhshi Carvansarai, Kashan, Iran.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 21:56:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO not your best. Image quality is excellent but I'm not sure this is really an FP-level composition, and the light is not great - quite flat midday lighting with a slightly washed-out and uninteresting sky, and with shadows covering a lot of the foreground. A deserved QI but not FP to me, despite the excellent resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 23:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Large part is in shadow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Far from your best, but I like it. I think you can make it better by cropping most of the sky but that is just my 2 cents. - Benh (talk) 06:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

not so sure :). Another thing, maybe it's slightly tilted to the left. - Benh (talk) 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose current crop made it worse. You should add back the right side in my view. - Benh (talk) 09:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 07:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: , @Cmao20: , @Benh: , @Peulle: Thanks. I improved the shadows and cropped the sky.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think cropping the right side has made it worse. This is a composition that should be symmetrical; it now looks unbalanced. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. but the empty space in right side was big.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barsana Holi Festival.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 09:52:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Narender9 - uploaded by Narender9 - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking picture and image quality is acceptable. Cmao20 (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another National Geographic-quality image. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Blue and orange clouds over the Mekong with a pirogue running in the water at sunset in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 01:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Your photos of Laos are so picturesque that it's very hard not to love them on a purely image level, but this photo also gives the eyes a lot to see and a lot of places to move. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 11:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 13:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support A very tranquil mood, although I think it would be helped if there was less of that dark cloud at the top. Daniel Case (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this suggestion, but the light blue corner also gives depth in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think it's pretty stunning to be honest. Cmao20 (talk) 00:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Especially that fleeing boat? I find something extra.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

File:Brotia binodosa 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 11:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Pachychilidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 11:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 11:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the most amazingly striking shell, at least at first, but wonderful details. I like this photo most at 90% of full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A shame that the tip is missing, still, a nice one Poco a poco (talk) 07:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info It is not a shame, it is the natural state. Many species of these group of frehwater snails (Family Pachychilidae) loose their first whorls during growth by erosion, caused by their habitat, lime-deficient water, see e.g. here, here, here and others. --Llez (talk) 09:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, thanks for the explanation Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Pachychilidae

File:Kötteler Grund-20200725-RM-163017.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 22:23:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, striking composition. Cmao20 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inviting. The kind of ideal, idyllic summer day that the pandemic cannot take away. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. I wasn't expecting to like it when I saw the thumbnail, but at full page, the superior quality of the composition comes through. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It doesn't have to be always a sunrise or sunset... Good midday shot! --Basotxerri (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Poster for Quo Vadis (1913 silent film) - Lygia Bound to the Wild Bull.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 10:24:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by The National Ptg. & Eng. Co. (New York, Chicago, St. Louis) - originally copyrighted to George Kleine - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info I realise the above is not QUITE the standard format, in that it includes the copyright holder, but since the claimant of the image varied from the only credited person or group that would count as creator - George Kleine is not an artist - it seemed worth mentioning. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Forgot to add this to candidates. Doing so now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film

File:Scalloped yellow glider (Cymothoe fumana fumana) female.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 09:41:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info A large West African forest butterfly. Not present in any traditional wildlife destinations. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 11:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful butterfly and fine photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The flash is really strong because not much light got in to begin with (f/16, ISO 800, that's f/25 and iso 1200 on a Full Frame to put things in perspective). I wonder if this narrow aperture was needed since the subject is mainly flat, but maybe you didn't have time to carefully choose. The noise reduction soft missed a chunk under the left wing at the bottom. - Benh (

talk) 17:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shapening artefacts removed now, thanks. The butterfly is not at right angles to the camera, so need as much DoF as possible. These guys rest on the ground for a short period of time and it's really tricky to get the whole butterfly in focus. I have to preset the settings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Andrei (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The flash is forgiveable because the butterfly is so sharp and so large in the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 00:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Axel ^(talk) 06:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:SJ Norge Di 4 654 Nattog 475 Trondheim - Bodø near Dalselv.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 20:39:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment SJ Norge night train crossing a dam south of Mo i Rana in the first light of the day. -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Classy. I might crop 10 per cent off the bottom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting suggestion (to get rid of the shadow), but then the sky becomes too dominant. After a try I prefer the current framing personally (rule of thirds) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Take off a bit of sky too to give it a slightly more panoramic look? I'm only trying to turn an excellent shot into something even better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It might work like this too, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Very dynamic composition, nice colors, excellent viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work as ever. Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Another excellent picture from Kabelleger; would make a nice desktop wallpaper. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It feels like the scene is all on the move. Great shot. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but shadows quite cluttered IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Headlamp and front on a Volvo V60 in Tuntorp.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 21:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info All by me,-- Cart (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but not wow --Wilfredor (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special --StellarHalo (talk) 06:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yeah I'm not seeing any wow here.--Peulle (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Okeydokey, seems like this is a non-starter. --Cart (talk) 06:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buff-breasted Paradise-Kingfisher - Julatten.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 00:48:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info An excellent photo of a beautiful bird; recently passed unanimously on English Wikipedia's FPC. created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fischer.H (talk) 07:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 13:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish the beak were as sharp as my egret's, but I understand the distance required slower speed here. Overall special behavior -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 05:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Axel ^(talk) 06:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

File:Гора Стримба взимку.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2020 at 21:45:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Another nice photo from Wiki Loves Earth Ukraine. I enjoy this nice snowy scene especially in the current hot weather. created by Ryzhkov Sergey - uploaded by Ryzhkov Sergey - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - Beautiful image with lovely details, but not a great overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How is the datestamp for this image possible? May 21? Really? Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That special sky works for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

File:02019 0594 Equality March 2019 in Częstochowa (cropped).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 05:12:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
Info created by Silar - uploaded by Silar - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think that crop really works, to be honest.--Peulle (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose I like the colors, but that cropped flag doesn't work in either one. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight crop especially below -- Spurzem (talk) 07:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Please consider the alternative version --Andrei (talk) 12:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both versions work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative (wide crop) edit

Info created by Silar - uploaded by Silar - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support easily one of the best pictures of demonstrations I've seen here, in the sense that it is not an utter mess compositionally. Some nice facial expressions in there as well. --El Grafo (talk) 09:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Are you quite sure that all of the people shown agree with being published in this way? MartinD (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not required for mass events, please see (exception, case 2) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Poland --Andrei (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colourful picture of a demonstration --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 18:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral This version is definitely better, but not enough to me to reach FP level due to lack of wow, lack of sharpness and cropped flag on the left. On the other side I agree with El Grafo, we don't see many demo pictures here and this one is not bad at all Poco a poco (talk) 07:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 09:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 21:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a lovely photo. (unless you are a worm, that is.) Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd be happier with a much closer crop on all sides to eliminate the unsharp thing in the lower right corner and some of the red wall that's just sitting there. The birds are very cute but the rest of the photo is causing me to not feel a wow. However, I don't feel right opposing, so I'm commenting. Also, I believe your gallery is malformed: I think you should eliminate everything after "Family:Muscicapidae". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The heading was also misspelled/mis-written. The Bot wants exactly the same spelling as in the heading. It can only go by the characters in the heading, it doesn't "understand" what it means. (FPCBot is not an AI) Thanks Ikan for spotting this. Now fixed. --Cart (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)

File:Lysimachia clethroides. 06-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 05:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Primulaceae
Info Flowers and buds of a Lysimachia clethroides , with its characteristic inflorescence. Family Primulaceae . Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think you can crop off a little bit of the top for better balance. And if we can have more at the left that would be ideal, if not no worries. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment please check the notes. --Ivar (talk) 10:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. spots removed. Fixed minor damage to the plant. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely background. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A teal background? Interesting ... Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background color ruins it for me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light (and the background reminds me Uoaei1's orchids :-)) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bold move, could work in general. But the warm light/WB on the subject and the blue-ish tint in the background kind of contradict each other, leading to a slight dissonance that, unfortunately, makes it feel completely and utterly wrong to me. --El Grafo (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose stacking issues are still there and per El Grafo. --Ivar (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 00:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Primulaceae

File:Schedelsche Weltchronik Trier 1497.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 11:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
Info View of Trier in Schedel's World History (1497), reproduced from an original woodcut of 1497, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Detail is blown-out and irreparably lost in some parts of the image, especially the left edge. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In full resolution the surface structure of the paper is clearly visible. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice drawing for me. It's a black and white drawing so I'm not really sure what detail could be blown out. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For me, either it should be edited so that the background is pure white, or if there is going to be a natural background showing the texture of the paper, it shouldn't be blown out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good for me. I don't see any parts blown out. -- Spurzem (talk) 07:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King of Hearts. The paper structure is quite visible in most parts of the image, but there clearly is a considerable loss of detail due to blown-out highlights (especially at the left edge of the paper). --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seems excessively manipulated. No-one's looking at images of this era and wishing they look like this. It's, frankly, half way between acceptable states: No paper texture or the original. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It has been enhanced and quite a few spots have been removed. No excessive manipulation at all. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other

File:Borujerdi House Kashan Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2020 at 16:17:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm really in awe in front of Persian architecture. I think you capture it well. - Benh (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question I'm really interested to know what happened to the missing faces. Something related to the Iranian revolution? Would add a lot to know. - Benh (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Benh. That's your kind. Persian architectural is very rich and full of beauties. yes, unfortunately after revolution they did it. after revolution there was dogmatism thoughts. now even Fundamentalist don't do such things in this level.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I have to say this as an Iranian, Iran lost a golden opportunity, and with this revolution, we have gone back in history. --Gnosis (talk) 05:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the Public Relations Manager of Kashan's heritages about the faces. he said after buying this place from owners, paintings were worn out and in Restoration process they could not Recreate the faces. because they haven't any pictures from the original faces.I'm sorry for false information. --Amirpashaei (talk) 08:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think knowing the context of their removal is more than enough. It's only factual and with no opinion. Thanks a lot for the investigation. I'll add that bit of information in the caption if you are fine with that. - Benh (talk) 09:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome Mr Benh. Thanks for adding information in the caption.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After some thought, I won't mention that in the caption. It's hard to think it isn't voluntary that only the faces were washed out/removed/used, but it is not clear who could have done this. Sorry for disrupting. - Benh (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the painting created by Sani ol molk . all the pictures has been worn out but they could fix the paintings except faces. because fixing them led to a change of faces. but I don't realize why they remove it, Instead of letting go.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding image! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lucky you, when I was there, there was a horrible big air conditioning box spoiling the picture, which was not so easy to clone out Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 08:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding detail and beautiful motif. Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support بناء مهيب وفخم --Wilfredor (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - La Esmeralda, Act III, Scene 1 set design (Version 2).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 16:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by Charles-Antoine Cambon - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 06:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question is there any way to know if the background color is original or if the paper is just very yellow from aging? Buidhe (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Buidhe: There's prints - not of this, admittedly - where they have a yellow lithograph layer to evoke this sort of art, e.g. [1] [2], [3], [4], [5]. The colour of the paper is usually somewhere in the yellow/brown spectrum, with exceptions, and the same is seen in the lithographs aping the style, and some of said lithographs are quite close to this which methinks is a good sign of it being an intentional choice. It's not considered a prestige art style nowadays, so it's seen a lot less, but it has a history dating back to - well, I can find examples from the early 16th century, so... In the 19th century, I'm aware of Alfred Waud as another prolific user of it, e.g. [6], likewise William Waud and a few others. And all descriptions of the technique mention using "buff" paper, which is the term used for various shades of yellow. I believe this technique was kind of big in this period because it was particularly good for lithography - the contrast between white areas, dark areas, and midtones are very obvious. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Very interesting, thanks for the explanation! Support Buidhe (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems good to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera

File:Ardea goliath - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2020 at 11:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first, I found the background too distracting, but I actually like the strong sense of movement in it, as it helps produce a good composition. And of course the bird is FP-quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit motion blurred --Wilfredor (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea

File:Catharus fuscescens CT.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2020 at 11:47:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough for FP, in my opinion, but please add a gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough for QI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice capture and useful for Wikipedia articles, but the sharpness is on the low side IMO. Also, per Ikan please add the correct gallery. Cmao20 (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I think the gallery issue is fast becoming moot. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think it's moot. Doesn't a gallery still have to be specified, even if the nomination fails? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The gallery should always be added at the beginning of the nom so that it's easy for voters to see what the nominator thinks the scene depicts (it's not always as easy as this bird) and to compare it to other existing FPs. It's even helpful to see if it's the first FPC of a species/place/item and no similar FPs exist. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not sharp enough and not high enough resolution either.--Peulle (talk) 07:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Should no gallery = speedy deletion? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think so. There are always newbies who don't know the system well and also old-timers who get absentminded from time to time (hint to Poco about his latest nom). But failing to add a gallery after being reminded is not good. --Cart (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, failing to add a gallery after being reminded was the circumstance I was talking about. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One thing that might help is if people simply comment that they won't vote for something (not even evaluate it) until it's been properly categorized.--Peulle (talk) 10:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Terminal 2.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2020 at 05:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Airports
Info created by Jacky Cheung - uploaded by Jacky Cheung - nominated by Jacky Cheung -- Jacky Cheung (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jacky Cheung (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed clouds, heavy colour noise in the darker parts. --Llez (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Without even going into technical issues, I really don't see anything special in this composition. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what made you think 'wow' when you looked at this, but per Llez overexposed clouds and too much colour noise. As for composition, I like the leading lines but I think it would be possible to produce a composition that featured them a bit more prominently. Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marunouchi Central Plaza with blue sky, Tokyo station and Shin-Marunouchi Building, panoramic view from JP Tower, Tokyo, Japan.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 01:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This composition could work very well if it weren't for that giant shadow going across center, as the plaza could function as the main subject then. As it is now, it feels very unbalanced, though: The train station is getting most of the attention, but it is awkwardly located in the corner and does not work well as a min subject. --El Grafo (talk) 08:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A very thoughtfully composed cityscape, but while the shadow doesn't bother me the dark buildings at the upper left do. Daniel Case (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice urban scene. The shadow doesn't really bother me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but midday light is too harsh for me. --Ivar (talk) 15:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oddly, this reminds me of a really good diorama. Thank goodness Tokyo Station is there, so that we see something other than only boxy modern buildings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The strong distortion is as disturbing as the shadow.--Ermell (talk) 21:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The shadow just does not work for me, sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaztelugache, Bermeo, País Vasco, España, 2019-08-13, DD 14.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2020 at 06:50:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Gaztelugatxe, Bermeo, Basque Country, Spain. Gaztelugatxe (meaning in Basque "Rock Castle") is an islet belonging to the municipality of Bermeo, Basque Country, Spain. The hermitage on the top of the islet, dedicated to John the Baptist, dates from the 9th or 10th century. The location became very popular after some scenes for season 7 of the fantasy series Game of Thrones were filmed there. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 👍 (but please fix the gallery) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and image quality (but per Basile, gallery needs fixing) Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to the rock arch on the right side ca's. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you mean, Fischer.H, could you please add a note? Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

there are ca's on both rock arches on the right side of the picture. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fischer.H: I've uploaded a new version. I saw some slight traces of CA but had to look at it at 200%, and I'm offering almost 50 MPx... Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 06:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Red-capped Robin - Bimbi.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2020 at 10:58:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 11:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very pretty, but I would prefer a tighter crop (and a bit lighter) JJ Harrison. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me. Perhaps it could do with a bit more sharpening but it's a matter of taste really. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support So cute/pretty! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 00:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 05:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please add the scientific name --Llez (talk) 06:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - Set design for Act V, Scene 2 of Fromental Halévy's La reine de Chypre.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2020 at 14:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by Charles-Antoine Cambon - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful work. Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera

File:Migrant spreadwing (Lestes barbarus) female Belgium.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2020 at 16:22:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Lestidae (Spread-winged damselflies)
Info These small damselflies (approx. 40mm long) settle with their wings spread, so a macro lens without focus-stacking cannot get everything in focus (see existing Lestinae FPs). No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nicely composed and very high image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 05:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Lestidae (Spread-winged damselflies)

File:SL Anuradhapura asv2020-01 img10 Lovamahapaya.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 20:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sri Lanka
Info Detail of the archaeological site of ancient Lovamahapaya (Brazen Palace) in Anuradhapura Old Town, with its remaining stone pillars. --- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 20:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed and nice interesting place. --Cmao20 (talk) 01:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best lighting, with the pillars in shadow and a shadow cast on part of the roof. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King --StellarHalo (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VW I.D. Buggy Genf 2019 1Y7A5934.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2020 at 14:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info created by Alexander-93 - uploaded by Alexander-93 - nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank goodness for some of the flaws in the photo, because otherwise it looks almost computer generated. --Cart (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't normally like these motor-show style photos of cars because they tend to look very corporate and samey, but this one is really good. It works because of the simple all-blue background contrasting with the green of the car. Cmao20 (talk) 23:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice background, good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles

File:Walruses on ice floes.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2020 at 21:58:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Odobenidae (Walrus)
Info created and uploaded by Кирилл Уютнов - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 21:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 21:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little bit of posterisation, but a really amazing picture IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Probably tough to take, I agree, but I'm not wowed by it, and it looks almost oversharpened ... was it downsized? Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll await the answer to Daniel's question, but it's a very good composition and I'm inclined to support, although if there's a larger version of this, please substitute that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Downsized or not downsized? That's the question. The answer to this question could be Кирилл. But he is now far away in the Arctic Ocean, sailing on a yacht along the Northern Sea Route [7]. There is no connection with him. In my opinion, the size is enough to understand the beauty of this photo. --KSK (talk) 06:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Considering everything, I will abstain from voting. I hope he has a wonderful voyage, and when he's back, it might be worth checking with him on this and suggesting he upload full-size images if he's not doing so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It doesn’t look very natural to me. Water looks like it's full of small waves from a helicopter and one of the walruses is looking right up at you. Not very nice scene to imagine actually. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm fine with it. I don't believe they were harmed or annoyed that much. - Benh (talk) 06:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No definition on the subject (not surprising with the very high shutter speed and ISO) and the water and animals disturbed (it seems) by the helicopter. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Podzemnik. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel --StellarHalo (talk) 15:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:15th century egyptian anatomy of horse.jpg (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 07:22:53

Info This FP was approved in 2006. The resolution is too low, today this would not pass FP nomination. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I agree that this is not one of the finest images on Commons in 2020. The resolution is low and the sharpness is not great either.--Peulle (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --StellarHalo (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I honestly thought this was a rat. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist poor quality reproduction compared to today's material, although I think the subject is worthy of FP if a better version appears. Cmao20 (talk) 00:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist A bit blurry and clearly too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 14:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Münster, Aasee, Pier -- 2020 -- 9215-7.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2020 at 11:39:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 11:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 11:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow--Wilfredor (talk) 13:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are some artifacts in the sky, looks like hair (dust spots). --Basotxerri (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you. Sorry. Flying birds and insects. I've fixed the trails and additionally I reduced the noise in the sky. --XRay ^talk 14:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like the composition, but feel like the contrast and saturation in the sky might be slightly overdone. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you. I reduced contrast and saturation in the sky. --XRay ^talk 15:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like the mood overall but I feel like the shadows have been lightened too much especially on the left hand side which looks a little odd. Also not sure about the graffiti although obviously that's not your fault. Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support although I do think some of the bottom could be cropped out so those diagonals get in the corners. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 13:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20 that the graffiti (even if it's an integral part of the sculpture) spoils the tranquil mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compo, very nice sky. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special IMO. —kallerna (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20 --StellarHalo (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors

File:Dandelions at the edge of a parking lot in Tuntorp, Brastad.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 21:05:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Cichorioideae
Info On second thought Daniel, I think I'll test "some weeds growing in a parking lot somewhere anyway. :-) I like the gritty, dirty feel of this, showing that these plants will grow just about anywhere. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I'm not really wowed by this composition.--Peulle (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it very much. The idea is similar to one of XRay's recent nominations, but I think this one is a little bit better because the brightly-coloured plant contrasts nicely against the greys and browns of the background. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the way the contrast between the regularity of the stone and pavement and the irregularity of the plants is further enhanced by the contrast in the tones: bright and warm for the plants, neutral for the rest. Daniel Case (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what is the interest here, but sorry, the shadow appears too unattractive to me. --Cayambe (talk) 09:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the idea, but I think it would work better to crop out the dandelions' shadows and the light on the right. I just think that would result in a neater form. I think you'll disagree, but I'll mark my proposed crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Cart (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama vom Wagendrischelhorn.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 14:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Salzburg
Info Panoramic view (360°) from the Wagendrischelhorn on the Reiter Alpe in the Berchtesgaden Alps on a day with clear visibility. All by me Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't normally like 360° panoramas but this one is very impressive. Cmao20 (talk) 23:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Scrolling across it at a slow enough speed feels like the kind of establishing shot you see at the beginning of a movie. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Salzburg

File:RhB-Pendelzug auf der Engadiner Linie.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 18:43:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The crop is a little too tight on all sides (especially the top), but still a great picture all-around. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo. Cmao20 (talk) 23:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, I like the sunny weather with the snow -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the nomination! This being an old photo I didn't like the post-processing very much, so I've uploaded a new version. I've also found a bit more sky. You may need to press SHIFT+reload or something to see the changes. Hope you like it - If not, you know where the revert button is ;) --Kabelleger (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Bergtocht van Val Sinestra naar Ramosch 15-09-2019. (actm.) 13.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2020 at 04:31:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Detail church tower with clock.
Info A simple photo of a beautifully decorated church tower of the alpine village of Ramosch.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The centralised composition with the truncated roof and just a tiny bit of sky doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 08:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice light and good quality but the bottom crop is a little tight. Cmao20 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above and the cropped roof at the bottom. I also miss something here to consider it one of our finest. Poco a poco (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Interesting building with picturesque bricks and featured paintings, but hazy background, and I also find the composition awkward, per Charles and Poco. From this point I think a closer view with a tighter angle and a vertical framing could have worked better (without the roof at the bottom), focusing on the main subject only -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cangrejo verrugoso (Eriphia verrucosa), Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-08-01, DD 14.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 21:10:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class_:_Malacostraca_(Malacostracans)
Info A warty crab (Eriphia verrucosa) in defying position (as I got very close to capture it) in a depth of aprox. just 1 meter underwater off the coast of Setúbal, Portugal. Adults like this one have a width of 9 centimetres (3.5 in) and a length of 7 cm (2.8 in). c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo. Can you add the fact that it's in 'defying position' to the image description? Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did, Cmao20, but I couldnÇt find any proper category for that, maybe our ultimative category magician, Daniel Case can help here? Poco a poco (talk) 09:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Cart (talk) 10:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good sharpness, nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support And yes, I found some categories to add (although credit should go to Diego for finding Arthropods in threatening poses, one I didn't know about). Daniel Case (talk)
I found the animal. It was Cart who found that category :) Poco a poco (talk) 05:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Class_:_Malacostraca_(Malacostracans)

File:Fog around Lake Heron, Taylor Range, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 23:33:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)
Info All by me. It's a fog around Lake Heron, Taylor Range, Canterbury, New Zealand. -- Podzemnik (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the unusual lighting and the fog. -- Podzemnik (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! One of your best panoramas. Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fog seems solid -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support not bad. - Benh (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was kidding, it's gorgeous ;) - Benh (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 05:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)

File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) female fulvipes 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 23:42:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Coenagrionidae (Narrow-winged Damselflies)
Info created & uploaded by User:Charlesjsharp - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional sharpness of all parts of this damselfly's body in this outstanding photo by Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, good one. Cmao20 (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see, FS is becoming standard Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, When we have more time on our hands and we can manage the process so it does not look focus-stacked. And this animal is alive. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, please, refrain from making such silly comments in FP noms that have nothing to do with it. The animal is alive and the detail good but far from extrem macro. Show me (you or anybody else) an alive animal with detail and proper DoF with a magnification of 3,75 times of this version and I'll shut my mouth. Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 05:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Coenagrionidae (Narrow-winged Damselflies)

File:Adrift, listless, unmoored - Wast Water.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 06:36:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Derek Finch - uploaded by User:Red panda bot - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough for a landscape photo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is very good, but I also find it too soft for FP.--Peulle (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Noise, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Poetic, non-descriptive names might work on Flickr, but not at FPC. --Cart (talk) 10:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice composition and I like the sepia toning. IMO a bit too soft for FPC though. Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all the other opposes. But Mr. Finch should not be deterred from entering it into a contest where artier landscapes are sought. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral well composed, but might be not sharp enough for FPC

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abandoned building, Kolmannskuppe, Namibia.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 19:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Namibia
Info created by James Kerwin - uploaded by B2Belgium - nominated by B2Belgium -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost a painting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good find. Thank you for nominating this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per King - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 22:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Composition, light, subject... Fascinating photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is this real? Looks like a Salvador Dali painting. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great catch! - Benh (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oops! I have to admit, never heard of this place before. Greatly unusual interior shot. --A.Savin 14:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice find. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An artwork! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! --El Grafo (talk) 08:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine example of surreal reality. --Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Warmth and slight softness, which I might otherwise take exception to, actually enhance this image's painterliness. Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 19:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Namibia

File:Roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus koba).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 16:08:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info Africa's second largest antelope. You can only find this subspecies in West Africa. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support You lookin at me? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality photo. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Wooden walkway leading to a hut with straw roof in front of karst mountains with mist, at sunrise, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 01:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm well aware that people work hard and struggle in Southeast Asia, but when I see this photo, my first thought is Oz. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support You're on a bit of a roll at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like it, but the sky is blown out in some parts --Llez (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meiræ 19:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A luxury for the project having you in that part of the world Poco a poco (talk) 10:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Laos

Vulpes vulpes beringiana in habitat edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 10:44:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes beringiana) in habitat. South Kamchatka Nature Park, Kamchatka peninsula
Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes beringiana) is preparing to jump. South Kamchatka Nature Park, Kamchatka peninsula.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created by NadezhdaKhaustova - uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by NadezhdaKhaustova -- NadezhdaKhaustova (talk) 10:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- NadezhdaKhaustova (talk) 10:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do not think they should be nominated as a set. The close-up is too soft for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree they don't qualify as a set, according to the rules. The passage of time is quite anecdotal here, and both have very different compositions. However each of them would have a chance if nominated separately, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a valid set IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile, King. Do feel free to nominate the photos separately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above but I think they are both good pictures and I would support them each if nominated separately. Cmao20 (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. If you nominate the first photo by itself, I might consider supporting it. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination NadezhdaKhaustova (talk) 11:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of interance of a room in Atabaki sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom,Iran4.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 21:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good although it's a shame the pillars are so blurry at the top. Difficult I expect to get them in focus though given they are much closer to the camera than the main subject. Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right Mr Cmao20.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are halos and blue and orange borders along the pilars, especially at the left around the space between the pillar and the building. Should be fixable. --Llez (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed It dear Llez.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Better now --14:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Support --Andrei (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support on correcting the spelling of "entrance" in the filename (but we should probably wait till after the nomination is completed). Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What a shame . You're right Mr Case. i'm sorry. --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File:Edouard Manet, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2020 at 00:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
Info A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, the last major work of Édouard Manet painted in 1882 shortly before his death. A transitional painting between Realism and Impressionism. created by Édouard Manet - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 00:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am actually not sure if this is large enough for FP but this is the best digital reproduction of the painting I could find. That said, this is one of my favorite paintings of all time and so, I want to give this nomination a shot. Please weigh in. -- StellarHalo (talk) 00:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and nice painting. Size seems OK for me, maybe a little low but the quality makes up for it Cmao20 (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Week Support. due to current quality. --Gnosis (talk) 04:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a famous painting and a very good reproduction. However, nowadays, FPs of famous paintings tend to have incredible levels of detail and humongous resolution. So I'm not confident this is an FP by today's standards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christof46 (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Groups

File:Macacanigra fighting.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 14:52:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Primates_(Primates)
Info created by Meldy Tamenge - uploaded by Meldy Tamenge - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 14:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 14:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Resolution is pretty low but I think it makes the cut for being a nice snap of animal behaviour. Have added an English caption. Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fun shot, but poor quality and size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I defer to Charles. --Peulle (talk) 21:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yeah, too small and not sharp enough. Might be a useful VI, though, in the right scope. Are you positive they're fighting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; and I second Ikan's question. They actually look like they're having a grand old time. Also, that's way too much unneeded dark space at the top that should be cropped out no matter the increasingly likely result of this FPC. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porta San Niccolò - Piazza Poggi - Firenze.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2020 at 14:05:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very striking composition but the saturation looks a little bit much to me. The green of the grass especially is very bright and it doesn't look quite real to me. Also the gallery is wrong; the correct gallery would be Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy Cmao20 (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I corrected the gallery.87.18.128.132 18:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI8787.18.128.132 18:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice composition. I don't think even the trees in the right middleground are sharp enough for FP, though - after all, FP is a high bar to clear. A sharper similar photo in more interesting light and/or with some nice clouds could be featurable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Unfortunately no clouds now on the sky of Florence, it is not raining at all and we are risking drought! As soon as there is a good storm I will run to Piazzale Michelangelo to take pictures!PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could also try a sunrise or sunset. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not only technical issues, but composition seems kind of random to me. Daniel Case (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your opinion, but for the composition I would like to point out that I framed in the same photo, Porta San Niccolò with its Fountain, Piazza del Poggi, and in the background the Duomo with Brunelleschi's dome, the Campanile di Giotto and even Palazzo Vecchio in Piazza della Signoria. And all this was neither easy nor taken for granted. Everything that tourists go to visit in Florence, all in one photo.As a tourist note, I specify that the "Rampe del Poggi" depart from Porta San Niccolò with the wonderful fountains that lead to Piazzale Michelangelo.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBB RABe 511 als S12 in Effretikon.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 13:13:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe not one of Kabelleger's best but I like it anyway. The thing that elevates it to FP for me are the figures in orange jackets, one of them looking at the camera and carrying a shovel to scoop snow. It means that this photo isn't just a snapshot, it tells a story - of men working hard to battle tough weather conditions and keep the trains running. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a picture of good atmosphere, but not composed as well as it could be. The train is not really reaching the foreground and so I am missing some depth. --Augustgeyler (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Thanks for the nomination! I like this photo very much for the light and the scene, but IMHO the image quality isn't there for FP. The (well, at least my) 24-70 f2.8L II just isn't very good at f2.8 and the picture might even have a slight front focus. --Kabelleger (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the quality is there for this to be an FP, considering that it's shot in a snowstorm, and I agree with Cmao20's argument, but it's hard to support a photo the photographer doesn't support. Kabelleger, do you think the nomination should be withdrawn, and/or would you vote against it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the slight unsharpness/lack of focus, it's the reason I said I don't think it's one of Kabelleger's best. I will keep my support though unless Kabelleger chooses explicitly to vote against. Cmao20 (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just added my opinion, no more, no less. I'm very happy if other people think that its other merits make up for the slight quality issues. Should it be withdrawn? I see no reason to. Would I vote agains it? No, I choose abstain because it is my photo. I do not feel qualified to vote on my photos, but I do feel qualified to give an informal opinion. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not the best framing/composition. Too much blank space at the bottom, and messy wires at the top. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King --StellarHalo (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others and my comments above. A little bit of snowy space in the foreground is fine for me and the wires are good for the eyes to move around. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain I do not feel more qualified than Kabelleger to vote on this photos, but I agree with him, KoH and Augustgeyler -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per David. Composition could indeed be improved by the right crop, but no point in suggesting it when it's this unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three-quarter view of a wooden footbridge over a lagoon, trees and mountains in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2020 at 01:33:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the compo and atmosphere Poco a poco (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well composed --Augustgeyler (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Laos

File:Ebensee concentration camp prisoners 1945 (cropped).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2020 at 06:34:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1950
Info created by Lt. Arnold E. Samuelson - uploaded by Andrei Kurbyko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 06:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 06:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on technical grounds. Highlights on the heads and the arm in the center are totally blown out in a way that looks like an artifact of bad digitization or editing rather than a problem with the original negative. One of the few technical advantages of film over digital has always been the smoother transition from very bright highlights to plain white ("highlight roll off"). (That's because the emulsion's response to an increasing amount of photons is logarithmic, not linear like today's digitral sensors). This has very sharp edges betwen dark midtones and blown-out areas — something you might get on film from a reflective surface in direct sunlight, but not from human skin under the soft light we have here. This does not look like a faithful digital reproduction of the analog original to me. --El Grafo (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: confirmed by the version available at archives.gov that does not have this problem (direct image link), identical to the first version of the the un-cropped file. Which also means that the given source for the second version of the un-cropped file (upon which the candidate is based) is probably wrong (i.e. was not updated when it was uploaded). --El Grafo (talk) 12:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info i tried to improve it with my basic skills File:Ebensee concentration camp prisoners 1945 (1).jpg, but not sure if went in a proper direction --Andrei (talk) 09:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - You smoothed out the edges by brightening other areas as well. That does indeed look better as it somewhat hides the problem, but it doesn't really solve it. Unfortunately, there is no way to get back the data that was lost when the highlights were blown out (looks like someone increased the contrast, as the shadows are also crushed much more than in the archives.gov scan). The only way to properly adress the issue is to find a high quality scan of the negative (or a good print) that hasn't been edited like that. --El Grafo (talk) 08:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain A powerful and really horrifying image. I will vote as soon as the issue pointed out by El Grafo is resolved, because we should try to promote the best possible version. Cmao20 (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending resolution of highlight issue. Daniel Case (talk)
Oppose per El Grafo. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination, for now. Thank you!--Andrei (talk) 10:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bararak Bako Manjujuang Katidiang.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 10:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Myfirmann - uploaded by Myfirmann - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cut at the top, so the composition looks awkward, and low depth of field (I don't think f/2.8 was appropriate here) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question What do you mean when you say a certain aperture wasn't "appropriate"? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I don't like the effect of having them blurry in the background, and it was less than necessary to increase excessively the speed with the current light conditions to create this feeling. I would have preferred a Dof similar to File:Kirab Calon Lengger Wanasaban.jpg, so that my eyes can navigate through the image and compare the various facial expressions (although in both cases the crop is sub-optimum) -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. Thanks so much for the clarification. I think of aperture as an artistic choice (to highlight certain things and to de-emphasize others) and I just wanted to make sure I didn't misinterpret your post (most of us here being non-native speakers of English sometimes requires extra legwork in order to prevent misunderstandings). Thanks again, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Yes a shallow DoF can be an artistic choice, but also a trend, or an easy solution. Easy solution because using the widest aperture of your lens saves you from worrying about speed and ISO: You'll always get a sharp target at F/2.8, whatever the composition. It works sometimes with an isolated subject, like here, but most of the time low DoF shuts off crucial elements within the frame. As an artistic choice, my personal opinion is that it's unnecessary to focus on a subject that is already leading in the composition. This woman in the foreground is automatically highlighted because located in front of all her followers. More creative would be the approach to teach us what these women behind add to the story. Although this is of course a personal taste, and the author might have done this on purpose, in a context. Idem for the tight framing, have these baskets voluntarily been sectioned or not? No clue -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't about the image, but about the way we provide feedback while treating each other respectfully. I like "I don't agree with your artistic choices" much better than "What you did is inappropriate". Thanks, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont Royal and Musée d'Orsay, Paris 10 July 2020.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2020 at 18:05:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France‎
Info created by Pierre Blaché - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 23:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful. I see one dust spot, which I will mark, and there seem to be some pretty subtle magenta halos on the rooftops on the right; I tend to think it's unnecessary to completely eliminate those, but maybe the relatively thickest ones furthest to the right should be dealt with. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thank Ikan Kekek!--Paris 16 (talk) 06:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you, but I'm not sure it's one of the very best photos on the site as long as the CA is not lessened, so no supporting vote from me yet. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per the CA noted by Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France‎

File:ISS035-E-007148 Nile - Sinai - Dead Sea - Wide Angle View.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2020 at 23:53:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Satellite_images
Info created by NASA Johnson Space Center - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 23:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 23:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and of course high educational value. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Now there is this curvature I want to see the whole globe 🌍 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ the intrusive part of the satellite. See below -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice picture. It's amazing how you can see nothing man-made from space. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can see the Suez Canal! --Andrei (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You sure can, I forgot all about that! It actually shows you just what an amazing engineering feat the Suez Canal was, that it's more or less the only visible sign of human activity in the region from space. Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One can also see a bunch of circular cultivated fields near the city of Tabuk :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question With Cmao20's remark above, I'm just noticing now a distracting part of the (man-made!) satellite at the left. Should be cropped IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cropping it out will make the composition not balanced (or will require cropping on the right as well). Are you sure it is necessary? --Andrei (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Or cloning it out, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cloning it out would mean loosing some geographic features and it will be a very big piece of land --Andrei (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done per Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO overwrite. Perhaps several square km on Earth, but just a few pixels on the image. The resolution is not huge, and it's just plain sand at this area. Moreover, nothing was lost because nothing was there :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! can I ask which tool you used? --2A02:A310:45E:FA00:2D13:59EB:73F2:9C88 18:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, I have to oppose falsifying landforms. I cannot support this. Satellite photos of portions of the Earth are reference tools that have to be reliable. Unless this edit is reversed, my opposing vote will stand. And moreover, showing a bit of the satellite in the photo is perfectly natural, as it reminds the viewer of the context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional support on {{Retouched}} maintained. It is so small nothing was left, absolutely no more than a painting restored, for example, as we do so often here. ~~Really unreasonable vote, Ikan~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome . I used Google map with Photoshop -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you can assure us that the landforms definitely look like that based on other satellite data, I'm OK with the edit. Otherwise, I wouldn't be, and I think we should consider the reliability of scientific reference photos to be a very serious requirement. Nothing unreasonable about it. Being cavalier in assuming a neat continuation would be unreasonable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The landform is exactly here. @Ikan Kekek: There's a dark spot noticeable at the right, and white sand under, as landmarks. You can draw a quadrilateral from El Hara (above), Faiyum, and Dendera Temple Complex, to locate the place on the picture. There's definitely a continuation from El Hara, until the intersection (out of the image) with a clearer part of the desert. Thus the missing part is similar to the sand right above. At this level of detail, really this is like a hair in a fur :-) Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I'm mollified. Next time, I'll try to remember to ask how you made the edit, rather than to object to it the way I did. I still think it was an unnecessary edit, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you too, Ikan. -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support And you can see the Egypt-Israel border if you look closely (most noticeable south of Gaza). I think Wadi Rum is also pretty obvious (it looks like there are even redder areas to its west. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Let's not forget about the strip of man-irrigated land either side of the Nile. You could argue that the desert is man-made too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info "The reason for the color difference is likely a higher level of grazing by the Bedouin-tended animal herds on the Egyptian side of the border" and its absolutely crazy --Andrei (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite_images

File:Sick trees - Panoramic trail - Northern Black Forest 01.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2020 at 07:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info Visible climate change: Dead and sick trees in the Northern Black Forest; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice QI, but nothing that makes me go "wow". --Peulle (talk) 07:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 10:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nécora (Necora puber), Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-08-01, DD 08.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 08:01:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class_:_Malacostraca_(Malacostracans)
Info Velvet crab (Necora puber), Setúbal, Portugal. Note: we have no FPs of this family Polybiidae. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid the image just doesn't make me go "wow!" ... The resolution is quite small, and there are a couple of water bubbles (sort of like dust spots, but underwater) obscuring parts of the legs.--Peulle (talk) 08:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a good picture of swimming crabs isn't really easy, they move quick and are very shy. The crab is also relatively small, and in this case a juvenile exemplar. I estimate that the carapace is approx. 8 cm width. Poco a poco (talk) 09:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afrtaid that you need clearer water for a good image. This is the underwater equivalent of a snowstorm. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per explanation of technical challenges. It would be better if we had a larger picture and with clearer water, but nice shot anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small and full of flakes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Like every submarine environment a crab can be found in will always have crystal clear water ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 04:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escarabajo errante (Ocypus olens), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-28, DD 440-475 FS.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 16:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Staphylinidae (Rove Beetles)
Info IMO one of Poco's sharpest and best-composed focus stacks. If it passes it will be the first FP of any species from this family of beetles. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a living or a dead animal? The leg posture seems somewhat unnatural to me. --Llez (talk) 16:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have asked Poco to specify when it's a dead animnal, so this will be alive. But it needs a lot of work around the edges - look at the bottom antennae for example. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a specimen of a family (Staphlinidae) without any FPs. I added some info and thank you for the nom, Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not in favour of dead bugs presented in this way. Why not photograph live ones? And the focus--stacking needs a lot of work as I said above. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the answer to the question 'why not photograph live ones' is probably practicality. It must be difficult to get a living bug to stay still for long enough to produce a photo stack. Of course some photographers sometimes do manage it - Ermell especially - but if the only opportunity Poco had to get the image was a specimen, the end product is still FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is challenging to focus-stack bugs, but using dead ones is not the answer. Some people put them in the fridge to slow down their metabolism. Better to keep trying to get it right. Museum specimen photos are of course very valuable. My two current focus-stacked damselflies are both hand-held shots outdoors and focus-stacked using Helicon Focus software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not seeing the stacking problems so far, but I'll await discussion on them before voting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added a note. Not difficult to see. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technical shortcomings aside, this dead specimen is imo not very appealing. --Ivar (talk) 07:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ivar, Charlesjsharp: I think that anybody can say that in general, dead animals are not appealing. Is that the point here? is that a reason to oppose (that's a rethorik question in your case, Ivar)? There are 2 options to photograph animals like this one:

Dead, here you can apply the strong light or flash that a lupe lens for 1-5x magnification requires and you can get as close as 5 cm with both the lens and the lighting. That's just impossible with a living animal as I needed in this case 36 frames for the focus stacking, that takes time (20 min approx.). Which animal wouldn't move 20 min long with a flash or strong light and a lens pointing at it 5 cm away? If you have no clue what I talk about have a look here how a US institute with lots of ressources does it or here how other people with more limited ressources do it.
Alive, forget using a lupe lens like MP-E and forget this level of detail. With a bit of luck and lots of attempts you could get detail but only for one frame, and at this level of detail DoF is ridiculous. Even with a good lens like the 100mm f/2.8 and a device like the helicon tube that allows you to shot very quickly a bunch of images to generate later on a FS image you have to be at a certain distance, again, forget this level of detail, that's a different kind of photography.

Please, don't complain about the fact that the animal is dead, you will never get this detail and DoF from a living animal. Poco a poco (talk) 08:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree Poco a poco. Don't you like the detail on my damselflies? I agree you have no hope with living animals with your technique. You need a different technique. Some cameras like the new Canon EOS 90D have built in focus-stacking, but only from live view. I use the Helicon Tube between my camea body and 100mm macro lens. I use burst mode and shoot 7 frames/second with the focus point moving further away every shot by 2mm. I don't use RAW as the camera writes too slowly. The Helicon software compenstaes for my sideways movements.T here can then be a lot of editing to erase multiple moving antennae. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, how can you affirm that the detail of this image of yours can be compared to the detail of this beetle? The beetle is 2,5 cm long and your damselfly 3,5 cm long. The beetle is 7,500 pixels long and parallel to the plane of the camera, your damselfly about 3,800 pixel long but not parallel to the plane of the camera, therefore approx. 2,800 pixel of detail. So, the detail of your image considering the resolution you offer (x axle) and the size of the subject is 3,75 lower. We are talking here about 2 different areas of photography, don't mix them up. I also have the 100 m f/2.8 and know what I talk about. Regarding using JPG instead of RAW for that burst needed there, double check whether the solution is not rather a faster memory card. Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. When I compare the two images, I come to a different conclusion. Many pixels does not result in higher quality. I use Sandisk Extreme 90 MB/s memory card, which writes less than 3 RAW+JPG images/sec. I do not want to shot just RAW, though that would only reach 3 images/sec. Not fast enough for a second burst of a live animal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree with you that many pixels don't necessarily result in higher quality, in fact, the more magnification, the trickier it is to get that quality because the lighting gets more difficult and you need to get very close to the object, so halos and those kind of things are more noticeable. The buffer size of your camera can store 27 RAW files, so I'm not sure what the problem could be. The 90 MB/s is the read speed, not the write speed, which will be lower, if you get a V90 card (e.g. Sony SF-G Tough Series UHS-II) you can write at a speed of up to 300 MB/s with a guaranteed minimum write speed of 90 MB/s. Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so it has 40 MB/s write speed, which makes using RAW even less possible. While it is buffering, I cannot take another shot. That is the problem with live animals. 90 MB/s would still be too slow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Some day, we can get a well-stacked image of a live one. For now I'm OK with this. Daniel Case (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts exactly. The end product is an excellent illustration, whether it's alive or not. Cmao20 (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 04:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination This isn't going anywhere. I'm still not sure why a specimen is so bad, but let's try something else. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atelier Nadar - Fly scene from Offenbach's Orphée aux enfers with Jeanne Granier as Eurydice and Eugène Vauthier as Jupiter, 1887 revival, wide-angle shot.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 09:46:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians_and_singers_performing
Info created by Atelier Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info The wings are drawn on like that in multiple versions of this photo. I presume they're replacing some stage effect that wouldn't photograph. It's a bold photo for the "now hold that position a few minutes" days of the 1880s. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with you: that's quite an amazing photograph! Unfortunately, I do not know this opera. I imagine it's performed in France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: You'll know the "Infernal galop" from it. It's the song the Can-can is danced to. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, yes, then I've heard a ballet suite from the opera. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support ENO did it at the London Coliseum in 2019. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It was actually one of the first two operas I was in, as part of a double bill wih Iolanthe back in 2004 in Edinburgh. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've played Iolanthe in the pit. Lots of fun! Were you singing a solo role or in the chorus? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chorus! It's such a fun show for chorus, though. I've done some bigger roles since, mainly in the Gilbert-without-Sullivan things. Mr. Brown/The Steward from Ages Ago, Cassandre in Eyes and No Eyes, Gripper in A Sensation Novel, and I was meant to be directing Mozart and Salieri before this year happened. Also did things like the Headsman in Yeomen of the Guard and one of the portrait ghosts in Ruddigore. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I hope you get to direct Mozart and Salieri soon. Two summers ago, Bard College in the Hudson Valley of New York themed their summer festival around Rimsky-Korsakov, and the final scene of that opera was done in a concert performance. Really good music, as usual for him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My favourite part is the end of the first scene, where Salieri works through his feelings. An utter tour de force. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What do you think about this version ? --Wilfredor (talk) 00:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Absolutely gorgeous work. I'm slightly hesitant to put speculative colours in articles, since we don't have sources for them and they might mislead slightly, but for any other use, that's amazing. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - +1 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians_and_singers_performing

File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 53-57 PAN.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 10:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info View of the south part of the Königssee with the Berchtesgaden Alps in the back, Bavaria, Germany. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very peaceful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a pretty nice panorama. I might nudge the exposure down a little though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I reduced it a bit, Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looking a lot better IMO, thanks. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice! ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Very appealing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite pristine --StellarHalo (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thought this was a professional photo of Yosemite for a second. ~ Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's composed like a famous painting. --Augustgeyler (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost postcard-level saturation, but I'm the last person here who should complain about that, and if that's how the scene looked when you were there, Diego, then by all means present it that way. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

File:One of the room in Atabaki sahn at Fatima Masumeh Shrine3, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 09:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 09:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 09:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes but I preffer the cut --Wilfredor (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I like both. but I think your crop less distracting for viewer.I will crop It. Thanks Mr Wilfredor.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

شكرا لك اخي على عملك الجميل. السلام عليكم --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Wilfredor. truly I'm Persian not Arab :-) --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have supported the previous version, but I find this composition much better than the original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, both are good but the cropped version is more satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 15:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support; what I thought might have been a tilt seems really to be a slight imperfection or imperfections in the building. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't it too dark? Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In many parts of picture we have light refletion in mosaic. I think in brighten version we will have annoying reflection.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ I disagree and the fact that it's so dark results in loss of detail Poco a poco (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In which sections are the details missing?--Amirpashaei (talk) 13:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My answer would have been for example under the arches, but the new version fixed the problem, much better now. I Support now --Poco a poco (talk) 21:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice shot but IMO too dark. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken near sunset. Why should it be so brighten? if in some part of the picture lost color and details because of darkness, then we have a problem.--Amirpashaei (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the shot is correct but IMO the lighting isn't good enough for an excellent image. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral now. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Andrei (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ Underexposed. Compare here. Nice building, but the light is not well managed. You can increase quite a lot the luminosity and reveal every details. You can't take a night shot and say "it's night, so my image should be black!" And the timing used in the evening is never the same as during daylight. Taking a photo when the sun is low is particularly nice because the contrasts are very subtle. But it's not a reason to hide details everywhere. On the contrary, you'll get a much better result and a more striking appearance if you offer a standard exposure. Darkness is acceptable sometimes when the contrasts are intense, to create a special mood, but in this case there is no risk of blown highlights, and we want to see the patterns -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: , @StellarHalo: , @Basile Morin: , @Basotxerri: , I wanted to avoid part of my picture in sunlight and other part in shadow.because that I captured at this time. I increased the light. I hope that's ideal in your opinion.--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Much better now -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per others --StellarHalo (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Papierkanten -- 2020 -- 9535.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2020 at 05:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 05:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I fail to imagine what exactly is on the picture? What is the oval object at the top? --A.Savin 14:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a piece of paper, photographed from the top. No, sorry, two pieces of paper - standing upright. --XRay ^talk 16:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same for me, I can't figure out the shape and curves, even at full size. One part resembles to a domed glasses lens. Both pieces of sheet seem rounded at the corners, one is bigger than the other? -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both paper have the same size. But it is an abstract photograph. --XRay ^talk 07:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info It's an abstract photograph and so it doesn't follow mainstream rules. There is no specific motive. It was created with two vertical sheets of paper that stand on a third paper that is illuminated from below. The photograph was taken from above and focused on part of the edge. --XRay ^talk 09:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meiræ 19:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Having looked at it on and off, it is attractive, whatever it isǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exactly per Charles, took me a while to make my mind up but I think it works. Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support alright, let's make it seven. --El Grafo (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am not wowed by this, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Yellow-faced Honeyeater 2 - Castlereagh Nature Reserve.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 05:25:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Ivar (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why so high in the frame? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Extraordinary quality for a bird in flight. Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Excellent. Looks like a super fast shutter speed did the trick. Seven Pandas (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Lots of wow in this image. The bird sitting high in the frame gives the wing room to reach down at full extension suggesting the bird is both moving swiftly forward, yet suspended in air. The out-of-focus lighter areas in the background balance well and frame the bird in flight in a way that may not happen with tighter cropping. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would prefer that the bird is sharper but this is still impressive --StellarHalo (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 16:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)

File:PK Kirthar NP asv2020-02 img21.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 14:13:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Pakistan
Info Sunset over the Hub Dam, Kirthar National Park ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry A.Savin, the quality is good but I don't think it's one of your best photos. All a tiny bit 'just another sunset' to me. I think the light is a tiny bit washed out, and although I love the scenery I miss an oustanding composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image but I got to agree with Cmao20. ~ Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a well taken picture. But I am missing something special, a more interesting composition. --Augustgeyler (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the technical issues, and the composition. A shame really ... I like the colors especially and the arid landscape, as if we are seeing sunset on a planet orbiting a red dwarf. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pied kingfisher pair, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 14:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Eyes left
Eyes right

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info The male (nearest the camera) has two black bands across his chest. The female has one broken band. They are monogamous and the pair spend much time together. I imagine that is why they instinctively turn together. All by Cahrlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, and interesting explanations. Should that detail be copied to the image description perhaps? Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice set. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and good.--Ermell (talk) 21:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support You got both birds in perfect moments. Technically these pictures are close to perfect. --Augustgeyler (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

File:Lucy Arbell as Queen Amahelli in Massenet's Bacchus, wide view.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 01:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians_and_singers_performing
Info created by Paul Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compelling facial expression, among other things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until the rotation is fixed, it's not straight on the page.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians_and_singers_performing

File:Radweg Universitätsstraße.png edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 06:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Gmbo 2013 - uploaded by User:Gmbo_2013 - nominated by Oliverbirmingham -- Oliverbirmingham (talk) 06:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Oliverbirmingham (talk) 06:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the level of detail is far from what can be described as one of the best images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:A cow's udder with vaccinia pustules and human arms exhibiti Wellcome V0016678.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 08:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science#Science
Info Discoveries of Edward Jenner, the man who has saved more lives than any other. Sketch by John Pass. Image created by Wellcome Images - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by User:Peulle.
Support -- Peulle (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for a preliminary Oppose. This is of course a great document, but I think for FP, the stains and tears should be digitally repaired. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ordinary old document -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I definitely don't agree on this. It seems to me to be of great historic importance. I'd surely support a good digitally restored version of this page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Exactly per Ikan. --Cayambe (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thousands of similar works of great historic importance -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are thousands of great paintings, too. We can consider each one of these individually if they are digitally restored and nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like you my review is based on the current quality, but also on the scientific drawing itself, I find rather rough and not special enough, far from galvanizing me as much as a great painting, map or engraving -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I understand and respect that. Not every FP can or even should be as beautiful as your Laotian landscape pictures, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sowjetisches Ehrenmal mit Gräbern – Ostfriedhof Leipzig.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 17:24:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/objects
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- Augustgeyler (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info I tried pictures of this object many times. But now the weather was a bit rainy and the graves had been restored just before I took that picture. Augustgeyler (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot! Looks a bit tilted, though. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition. Greenery cut away at bottom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown highlights, cropped greenery at bottom. Good subject, though. --Cayambe (talk) 10:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too little depth of field, below cropping too tight. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, also the color is a little strange. Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 20 % in focus, cannot be justified with "composition". --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I really like the subject and the image quality is good, but the cropped, outof-focus greenery at the bottom is a bit disturbing. Close, though - please keep on trying at FPC! Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wat Si Sou Mang (Buddhist temple) under a stormy sky in Vang Vieng, Laos (front view).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2020 at 16:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Laos
Info Basile has uploaded a lot of potential FPs lately and he could probably do with some help getting through them! This one drew my eye because it is a high-quality picture of a non-Christian religious building which I guess we could do with more of at FPC. Although the temple is the main subject, I really like the composition as it is with the dramatic stormy sky - the light and atmosphere are pretty special. created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A bit too much blacks and clarity, isn't it? --Cart (talk) 16:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes it's too much. I know Laos skies can be covered but they don't look this dark - Benh (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a faithful reproduction of the sky that day, @W.carter and Benh: believe it or not. And to be honest, I rarely saw such dark clouds so close over my head. Just to remember, this is how black the clouds can be here sometimes (not everyday).

Now, for the little story: I did not plan to take pictures that midday afternoon. I had my camera with me just like I had my passeport too. I left the restaurant and discovered it, then instead of going straight to my hotel to avoid rains, I could not resist and was attracted by the view. A large bunch of very diverse images shot immediately before are with me, including that shot taken at 14:38, less than three minutes earlier. Why would I invent this scenery seriously? (I even have ugly flowers in front of a bank, lol

, since I shot everything). I may upload the raw file (which is voluntarily underexposed) and you will check by yourself. Thanks a lot for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the clouds, I've seen similar myself. I'm more concerned with the bottom half of the photo (structures and trees), they look too processed. --Cart (talk) 18:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are usually pretty conservative, so I'd tend to believe you. But here even the trees show symptoms of clarity gone overboard (edit: or whatever processing, maybe the blacks, as mentioned by Cart). - Benh (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Benh, W.carter, and King of Hearts: I've reduced the whites and the shadows. Here is the original RAW file before perspective correction, light adjustment, crop and denoising. This image was uploaded for the photo challenge "HDR" of this month, and I think my take was honest. It's not easy to process such images with high contrast, because the eyes see more than the camera. My intention was to reveal an accurate representation of the scenery, as realistic as possible. Unfortunately technology is not magical, and you can't take such a sky without blown highlights, or without special tricks like HDR, since the parts in the shade are too dark. This is also a temple with shining golden painting. Any different processing is welcome, but no process at all is not fair -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose over processed and over saturated. And since when is how many FPs someone has a criteria for having more promoted? Seven Pandas (talk) 23:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. I was just paying Basile a little compliment because I noticed that a lot of his recent uploads would stand a good chance at FPC. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very well-composed, and I like the drama of the scene. With a sky line that, I'd be running to shelter! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The clouds to me aren't dramatic enough to offset the darker areas of the bottom, and I find the trees sort of randomly block aspects of the temple to the point that I would not support if the temple had been intended to be the subject). Daniel Case (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Benh here, too much to me Poco a poco (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel --StellarHalo (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gatekeeper (Pyronia tithonus) underside.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 21:47:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info A frequent visitor to my garden. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 15:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice quality and angle. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Karl Krause Fabrik in Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf mit stillgelegtem Bahndamm.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 22:46:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- Augustgeyler (talk) 22:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Augustgeyler (talk) 22:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground distracting --Wilfredor (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wilfredor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wilfredor. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As per Wilfredor Bijay chaurasia (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad foreground -- Spurzem (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Time to withdraw with this many opposes and no support besides the nominator. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe one more helps to decide. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what you are trying to do, but the big blurry foreground for me distracts rather than adds to anything. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abu Simble little temple 01 cropped.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 17:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Egypt
Info created & uploaded by MatthiasKabel - edited & nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perspective? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The panorama-style crop doesn't work. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not sharp either Seven Pandas (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not seeing the sharpness problem and the image quality is good, but the perspective does need correcting. Also all a little bit washed out to me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I think the perspective is just fine as those things are indeed angled backward. However, I agree about the softness. Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Regardless of the outcome of this nomination, the file should be renamed, as the place is spelled "Abu Simbel" in English. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cigarette smuggling with a book.JPG (delist), delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2020 at 01:05:52

Info Most of the image is blurry, a significant portion of the cigarette is also blurry, the bottom crop slices off part of the book, the angle of the photo is quite odd given that the book is very much rectangular (Original nomination)
Delist Whatever encyclopedic value this image might have cannot overcome its technical shortcomings -- StellarHalo (talk) 01:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I agree. The bottom crop is what annoys me most about it. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Ivar (talk) 06:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist certainly a VI, but the DOF is so shallow that not even the package of cigarettes is fully in focus. --El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. --Cayambe (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Acceptable use of artistic license. I really don't agree with second-guessing decisions made in 2013. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Really not that special as a photograph. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist ~ Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per KoH --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fire dance Indonesia.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 10:23:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Myfirmann - uploaded by Myfirmann - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing work. I mostly love the light the fire adds to the body in contrast to those dark clouds behind--Augustgeyler (talk) 10:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, this is how to light a cigar :-) Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A big wow factor there --Wilfredor (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 15:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow... ---- Jakubhal 17:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 22:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb! --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 12:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like some Usenet newsgroups back in the day ... Daniel Case (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely incredible -- Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Isidor Kaufmann - Portrait of a Rabbi.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2020 at 07:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info created by Isidor Kaufmann - uploaded by Botaurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fine quality. I'd love to support this, but unfortunately, the signature has been cut off. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Palauenc05. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Paulenco and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ Daniel: Thanks for that new version of my name. To be honest, I like it better than the original one. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I am not in favor of supporting a cropped painting. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сколівські Бескиди, вид з Парашки.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 19:09:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Sunrise in Skole Beskids National Nature Park, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine. created by Misha Reme - uploaded by Misha Reme - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated What is so exciting in turning a natural landscape into something fake with artificial colors and excessive contrast? Just look at the other uploads by this user (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc.), like here this is far too extreme -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, interesting point Basile Morin. I definitely agree with you about some of the other pictures you link to - 1 for instance has a quite ridiculous sky. I don't think this one is so overcooked though. I had a look at this image in Jeffrey Friedl's Image Metadata Viewer and I can't find any evidence of the saturation being altered, although of course there are ways to change saturation that won't show up in the metadata. Overall I have seen sunsets in my life that have colours as vivid as this one, so personally I'm not going to say that this saturation is ridiculous. But you do make a good point when looking at some of the other images by this user. Any feedback from other users about whether the saturation is too much would be appreciated. Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously Overprocessed. @Cmao20: you agree with me the #1 is oversatured, don't you? Well, check it out with Jeffrey Friedl's Image Metadata Viewer and you read "saturation 0". Logic? No. Because it is undeniably too saturated. This tool is useful to indicate what has been changed, but it does not show everything on Photoshop, and especially not the filters applied. Here I suspect blue and orange filters. Moreover, with your candidature, you can read from Jeffrey Friedl's Image Metadata Viewer blacks +88%! whites -64%, and shadows +48% with highlights -89%. That combination creates extreme contrast with heavy blacks -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I didn't think to check the other image too. Blacks +88% is certainly a little much in pumping up the contrast. I shall wait for some more opinions, as I have seen considerably less natural-looking photos than this pass FPC, but we may withdraw this one. Cmao20 (talk) 02:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

💡 A golden rule, if you really need to attenuate the highlights to render a sunrise or a sunset, then compensate this loss by increasing the whites, delicately. Not the contrary! . And not with the blacks in addition to force the impression like a tank 🦾 :-) But I agree with you it's not the first one nominated like this, and sometimes yes they even go promoted (feel free to give links so that we can compare). I just hope this one won't :-) and I also give the uploader a chance to make it better -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:В первом свете весны.Приморский край. Хасанский район.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 12:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far_Eastern_Federal_District
Info created & uploaded by User:Андрей Кровлин - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Assuming the colors are accurate, and I assume they are in this sunrise, this seems to me to be a remarkable picture. Have at it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not so sure about the accuracy of the colors, to me it doesn't look realistic, specially the purple hue, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can understand sky's color. but why ices and snow are purple?--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My assumption is that's because purple is the longest visible wavelength, so during this sunrise, everything that was sunlit was purple at the time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The color cast is probably artistic choice. It's not too shocking to me. - Benh (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco --Andrei (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated, like all the pictures uploaded by this user (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc.) Garish colors. Too much contrast. Unrealistic -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks like you have a point. User:Андрей Кровлин, would you like to dial back the contrast and make the colors more normative? If these aren't the real colors you saw, give us the ones you did see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others, sorry. --A.Savin 13:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, i´ve never seen such intense colors in nature, specially the purple ice. Je-str (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I no longer have confidence in the accuracy of this photo, and I don't expect User:Андрей Кровлин to reply to any pings, as he also didn't reply when I pinged him at COM:QIC. If he ever decides to address the points Basile and others brought up and produce a more true-to-life version of this photo, I can always renominate that version then. I still think this photo is beautiful, but someone who wants to provide radically altered photos should indicate that clearly in their file descriptions, and then we could consider them as such. Thank you for your reviews, everyone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phyllodesma ilicifolia caterpillar - Niitvälja bog.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 10:31:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Background is very good. Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars)