Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Crepuscular ray sunset from telstra tower edit.jpg

Image:Crepuscular ray sunset from telstra tower edit.jpg, not delisted

Info Size, noise. --Beyond silence 03:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC) (Original nomination)[reply]
Delist --Beyond silence 03:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Noise, size, and lack of details. Very beautiful though. --Digon3 ^talk 20:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Noise and size. -- Ram-Man 02:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although an edit might be worth considering. ~ trialsanderrors 04:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Why do we insist in killing the history of FP? This was not an error of judgement, just the esult of quick technological advances. Alvesgaspar 11:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not enough good. What do you like in that history? Some weak picture was been one of best? What are you talking about! --Beyond silence 13:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its not allways the technic things --Richard Bartz 19:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep agree with Alvesgaspar --Christoph Michels 21:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with Alvesgaspar --Richard Bartz 19:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Basik07 09:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Noise, size the subject is not represnted well. There's nothing special in this picture.--Mbz1 02:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Keep Lycaon 16:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 Keep, 4 Delist, 0 neutral => not delisted. Simonizer 21:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 1

Keep Still a great image IMO --Fir0002 www 07:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What? You're back to commons! So fast? We even have not had a chance to miss you yet. Oh, an btw
Delist Noise, size the subject is not represnted well. There's nothing special in this picture to keep a picture with the resolution less than 2 mega pixels.--Mbz1 12:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

I guess the irony was lost on you... despite the footnote! --Fir0002 www 05:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Seeder 18:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Have anyone noticed that this image is not a FP? SO, what's the point in nominating it for delisitng? Alvesgaspar 09:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say nobody nominated it for delisting, rather fir000002 nominated it to be kept--Mbz1 09:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Nomination withdrawn (not a FP) - Alvesgaspar 20:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is an FP - this is an edit of the FP above (reduced noise) --Fir0002 www 22:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only one edit of picture can be FP, I think. --Beyond silence 01:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]