Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Lynx kitten.jpg

Image:Lynx kitten.jpg - not delisted edit

Info nice but just a bigger thumbnail. Species not known. --Ikiwaner 00:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please link to the original FPC before delisting. This (and these votes) should be taken into consideration. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 15:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SvonHalenbach 18:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The only problem with it is that it is low resolution (I'm sure someone will name the species). It is too nice of a picture to delist just because of one problem. It is not unfocused or blurry and it shows animal in enough detail for me. --Digon3 18:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delist~~ See our resolution guidelines. Other pictures get rejected that have more than twice the resolution. We should follow the same criterias for all pictures --Ikiwaner 12:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - low res., species not identified, obvious zoo pic with withered cut foliage in surroundings. - MPF 23:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - ack MPF because of obvious flaws -- Lycaon 19:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Ss181292 23:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC) - ack MPF[reply]
Keep The size should not be the only reason to oppose. Perfect image otherwise. We can ask the creator to upload a bigger one but even if that's not possible, this deserves to stay FP. --Arad 01:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep . Lynx lynx. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 15:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two big baby eyes and reason is shut down :-( If this is Lynx lynx which is not unlikely the animal and the plant around don't fit together. --Ikiwaner 23:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way you can prove this is Lynx lynx 84.197.150.84 01:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --WarX 19:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)--WarX 19:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What is wrong with a "zoo pic" anyway?--Nilfanion 19:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep guidelines are just that, guidelines, in this case I believe it's a good idea to put them aside. -- Drini 19:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Because it's so damn cute =^^=. Darkoneko 21:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lestat 22:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Uploaded a new version with better resolution and fixed whitebalance. Baerni 21:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment that issue being resolved (thanks for that), opposition stands for being a fake (obvious zoo pic). Sorry. Lycaon 07:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I got a problem. I clean my cache but even then, when i click on the newer version of the file, i get the same old one. anyone else has the same issue? --66.36.159.46 12:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Same problem here. Strange, because the thumbnail and the preview seem to be updated. Baerni 16:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment sensationell, we got a bigger version! Unfortunately one cannot download it which is bad for a FP. Image has a green cast now but this can be fixed. Bärni, sag uns bitte, wo du das Bild geschossen hast, damit wir die Art bestimmen können. --Ikiwaner 17:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Invalid nomination. Image at full resolution is not accessible. fixed Lycaon 10:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is weird. --Arad 11:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Info I fixed this problem. We still need a colour correction. --Ikiwaner 11:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Info Colours corrected, now Keep --Ikiwaner 16:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now that all concerns were addressed. It's a really nice picture. -- Gorgo 16:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good image. /Daniel78 23:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Vmenkov 04:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 13 keep, 3 delist >> not delisted Alvesgaspar 13:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]