Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop

< Commons:Graphic Lab
Illustration Workshop Ark-icon.png   Map Workshop Ark-icon.png   Photography Workshop Ark-icon.png   Video and Sound Workshop Ark-icon.png  

Camera-photo.svg Photography workshop

Shortcuts
COM:GL/P
COM:GL/PHOTO

This workshop is part of the Graphics Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Photography Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request


See alsoEdit

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 10 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2017.Template:Autoarchive resolved section/parameter timecompare set to 'resolved'

Watermark removalEdit

Article(s): Lots are used

Request
Can someone remove the watermark from all Category:Files from The Bui Brothers Flickr stream ? They are extremely annoying. Thanks.--Sinistrial (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

This is not a realistic request, due to the large number of images. If you want to go through the images and add the {{watermark}} template to the images with a watermark, that will add the images to the "Images with watermarks" maintenance category. If you want to make a request for a specific image you need for a article you're working on then you can make your request (ideally should be 1-3 images), but asking us to go through 300+ images, find the ones with watermarks and edit them all is not a realistic request. I clicked through a number of the images and many aren't being used in articles. Please limit your request to images that are for use in a article or needed for a project/project tasks, etc. Offnfopt(talk) 10:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Chinese Exclusion ActEdit

Article(s): Chinese Exclusion Act (en), Loi d'exclusion des Chinois (fr)...

Request
Hello. We have a cropped and poor quality version of a political cartoon. Nevertheless, the original is available at the Library of Congress. I could import it as is, but maybe a graphic designer could restore it a bit? (the picture looks very dark). Okki (talk) 05:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
  •   Comment @Okki: What's wrong with just uploading one of the high resolution jpg versions, such as, https://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/pga/02700/02758v.jpg that looks like it does not need any work. There is an even bigger 150Mb tiff version from which you can create a very high quality (6232 × 8425 pixels) jpg. Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
I had the impression that we could do a better job (on colors, visible craquelure right in the middle...). Okki (talk) 10:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
What does better job really mean? Should it not be more accurate colourwise instead of exaggerated, in which case perhaps one should start out with one of the images that were photographed with colour patches and a grayscale: https://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/cph/3g00000/3g02000/3g02000/3g02045v.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 12:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Kenner LibraryEdit

Article(s): en:Kenner, Louisiana

Request
Is anyone interested in correcting the tilt in this image? It's not mine but I think a correction would be appreciated! --WhisperToMe (talk) 14:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Comment: essentially what you are referring to is an optical illusion. The photo is taken at an angle to the road and building, so you get the impression the building is tilted but it is not. Look at the trees and the perpendicular parts on the left of the building and you see they are vertical though perhaps there a very slight tilt showing on the left side, maybe it is a half degree off. Personally I would not bother. Ww2censor (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Aha, I see. If it's not actually tilted then no change needed! WhisperToMe (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

  Done If optical illusions are something which should not be edited, then please revert back to the original photograph. Edit: Okay, i found out that perspectives can be changed in wikimedia images. — ThiruN (talk) 10:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


Debluring the imagesEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. PawełMM (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

– when finished to trigger automatic archiving

en:Henry Avery [[]]

Request

The images are very blurred for Wikipedia usage. Kindly needed the expert here to sharpen the images --Thatonewikiguy (talk) 12:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. PawełMM (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

TrumpEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. PawełMM (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

  Done; Thread has been largely idle for some time and the original request no longer seems relevant. --Kevjonesin (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Article(s): Donald Trump

Request
Please remove the white stuff next to his right ear (on our left). People are reasonably objecting that it seems he's blowing smoke out of his ear. Thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
Please do not. We can't alter something that is constructively part of an actual photograph. It's not a dust spot; it's text on the background behind the subject.- MrX 17:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Seems like illegible text to me. Where is the rule requiring preservation of clutter?Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Do you really need a rule to tell you that it's a bad idea to alter a photo that is being used in a historic BLP, other than removing dust, scratches, and minor blemishes? - MrX 17:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
It's a few letters of illegibly blurred text from some generic backdrop. The old version will still be in the history if it's required. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Hi y'all, I haven't been around in awhile but thought I'd check in and see how the Lab's getting along and 'weigh in' a bit. ... There's plenty of precedent for removing unwanted background elements in general and for cropping and adding neutral backgrounds to portraits; in fact 'removal of objects' is presented as an exemplary function of the Lab under 'Types of work done'. The orthodox way to go about such would be to upload the altered image under a new filename rather than overwriting the original file—as per the Commons:Overwriting existing files guidelines—while noting on the resultant file page that the image has been digitally altered and linking the original file (Template:Retouched picture, Template:Derived from, Template:Derivative versions). --Kevjonesin (talk) 09:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: I came across some likely relevant details ... Item #1 at Talk:Donald_Trump#Current_consensuses_and_RfCs seems to strongly imply that any significant change to the present image may be considered controversial under the terms of COM:OVERWRITE at this time (and might even take on the appearance of an 'end run' around the consensus there). Anythingyouwant did you in fact end up topic banned from that article (and if so, are you still)? Regardless, if you'd still like an alternate image made without the 'smoking ear' effect I'm willing to fire up GIMP and make it happen, but if you're intention is to offer it as an option at en:Donald Trump please consider that it'll likely soon be superseded by some official White House portrait and hence may not be worth the effort. --Kevjonesin (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. Yes, I was briefly topic banned for a couple of weeks prior to the election in November. Water under the bridge. Thanks for considering this matter.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


Removal of AMKEdit

Article(s): az:Azərbaycan mədəniyyəti

Request
I aks you to remove abbrevation AMK from picture--Shahrux (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  DonePawełMM (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC) PawełMM (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

But I still see AMK in the picture.--Shahrux (talk) 08:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

I Want You by Marvin GayeEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. PawełMM (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

– when finished to trigger automatic archiving

Article(s): en:I Want You (Marvin Gaye song)

Request
Per talk, the label may be free to use. However, previously I thought it was non-free, so I uploaded an image as en:File:I Want You by Marvin Gaye A-side US vinyl 1976.jpg. After the talk, I was told that the common world grid is too common for copyright. Therefore, I wonder whether the image is non-free to you. If not, then convert image to PNG with transparent background. --George Ho (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


DanviksbronEdit

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Could the strong color banding be removed? --ArildV (talk) 10:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
@ArildV: I assume you are exporting the file from a raw through Photoshop. Try exporting it with no noise removal in the sky, or if that's not enough, with a tiny bit of noise added to the sky and with highest jpeg quality. Noise or dithering are the way to go to prevent banding if the information is actually present in the original (as it should be here).

Millard FillmoreEdit

Article(s): en:Millard Fillmore

Request
The Fillmore article is at FAC and a concern has been raised that the above image is rather dark. Can it be lightened? Much obliged… --Wehwalt (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Much obliged.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
That median filtering was a tad too destructive here, don't you think? The eyes, hair and collar are needlessly affected from the median filter. Median filtering is definitely good here, but I recommend applying it only selectively. What I usually do in cases like this is put a copy of the non-filtered image on top of the filtered one and use the eraser on the spots that need cleaning. Make sure the top image has an alpha channel first, though, otherwise it won't work. I also recommend checking out the "repair" section of tools in G'MIC, especially the "remove hot pixels" one, if you happen to not have used them before, they're great. —Quibik (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Removal of watercolorEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. PawełMM (talk) 07:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

– when finished to trigger automatic archiving

Article(s): ru:Шейх Алван Ширази

Request
I want to remove AMK but to keep background color--Abutalub (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  DoneQuibik (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Restore Abebe Bikila 1968.jpgEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Janweh64 (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Article(s): Abebe Bikila

Request
Clean up scratches, dust and other. Remove flash shadow.
Original hi-res found here Can any one please see if they can do any better with restoring this image. The version now seems to have a blur on right shoulder and loss of clarity in the eyes. With proper work this could qualify as Quality images or maybe even Featured images. --Janweh64 (talk) 23:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
  Done Centpacrr (talk) 11:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


Missing portraitEdit

Article(s): fr:Hans Martin Sutermeister

Request
Hi, would someone please upload a separate crop of one of these images of Sutermeister as (something like) a useful full-face portrait? There is sadly no other choice. Many thanks in advance for your help. --2A02:1205:504F:8300:1D1C:AD13:2747:B94E 23:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Oval cropEdit

  Resolved

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Clean, crop and recreate oval area in second image, all along the line similar to this version --KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Albert Levitt cleanup and portrait cropEdit

Article(s): en:Albert Levitt

Request
Hi, could someone clean this up a bit, lose the borders and maybe brighten it a bit? Also, could you prepare a crop showing his head and shoulders suitable for inclusion in an infobox as the article's lead photo?--Wehwalt (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Cropping a picture for an infoboxEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Janweh64 (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Based on this, could someone please File:Gustave Thibon et Bernard Antony.png crop the man on the right] for w:Bernard Antony's infobox?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Does "crop the man on the right" mean crop him off, or crop to just him? Dicklyon (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Crop him. He's the one with the polo shirt, no hat.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done: Maybe it needs to be brighter; Just ask. Ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I think it's fine, though you're free to modify it in the infobox if you want.Zigzig20s (talk) 09:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Oval crop 2Edit

  Resolved

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Oval crop and recreate the missing parts of the oval. Thanks… --KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 09:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Please crop pictureEdit

Could you please crop the man in the middle in this picture for w:en:François Pupponi?Zigzig20s (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Please digitally enhance imageEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


Article(s): British Expedition to Abyssinia

Request
Anything that can be done to digitally enhance this map while maintaining as much resolution (985 × 2,651pixels). Removed book folds and stains. Correct warp in bottom 5th of image.--Janweh64 (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

NawahiEdit

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Please turn black and white, restore oval edge like File:Joseph Nawahi (oval, sepia).jpg and oval crop --KAVEBEAR (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Picture to crop for infoboxEdit

Hello. Could you please crop the man on the left and update the picture in his infobox at w:en:Fahd Jassem al-Freij?Zigzig20s (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)   Done PawełMM (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

WatermarkEdit

Article(s): w:Hawaii and the American Civil War

Request
Please remove the watermarks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Photo montageEdit

I´m refering to the recent wikipedia entry in portuguese: Políptico das Sete Dores de Maria, and at the first image in it. I think should be better the readers could have an image of the original ensemble, like the existing in the english wikipedia entry: w:Seven Sorrows Polyptych.

The sequence of pictures should be like the indicated at the first image of the article and at the Galeria (1):

 
Template.
 
Central image.

The pictures are the following: Central (indicated in blue): File:Quentin Metsys - Virgem das Dores.jpg

Side images from top left, down, to top right:

File:Quentin Metsys - Apresentação do Menino no Templo.jpg File:The Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Worcester Art Museum).jpg File:Quentin Metsys - Menino Jesus entre os Doutores.jpg File:Quentin Metsys - Cristo a Caminho do Calvário.jpg File:Quentin Metsys - Calvário.jpg File:Quentin Metsys - Lamento ao pé da cruz - século XVI.jpg File:Quentin Metsys - S. João Evangelista e as Santas Mulheres depois do enterro de Cristo.jpg

Thank You. Greetings! GualdimG (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

  Request taken by ArgonSim (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

@GualdimG: Are you sure this is the right template? The central blue shape is rectangular, while the actual central image is slightly square. As you can see, one doesn't fit the other, so there is no way to arrange the pictures while following this pattern. --ArgonSim (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 
PawełMM proposal
@ArgonSim: @GualdimG: I tried to do that. PawełMM (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@ArgonSim: @PawełMM: Is very good! Thank you!GualdimG (talk) 08:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@ArgonSim: @GualdimG: @PawełMM: Maybe you are not familiar with the enwiki templates w:template:multiple image and w:template:photomontage that might be used to achieve essentially a similar result without making a single montage image and any individual image can be changed at will. There are a few other options linked on those pages. I'm not sure it works on any other language wikis - I tested the dewiki and it does not work there but the multiple image does work on the ptwiki. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@Ww2censor: Thank you for the suggestionGualdimG (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@Ww2censor: Thank you for useful information. PawełMM (talk) 08:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

WatercolorEdit

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Could you remove shadow in the center? But please don't change background color.--Abutalub (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)


StatueEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Article(s): [[]]

Request
In a separate derivative file, please crop and clean. Thanks. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

St AlbansEdit

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


Article(s): [[]]

Request
Crop and turn black and white, thanks. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

  Done PawełMM (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

William Edward EllisEdit

Article(s): William Edward Ellis

Request
Crop bottom and left. Enhance if possible.—አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)