Open main menu

Commons:History merging and splitting

Other languages:
Deutsch • ‎English • ‎dansk • ‎français • ‎polski • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎नेपाली • ‎日本語
Page history merge Simple.png

Shortcut: COM:HMS · COM:HISTMERGE This page provides information on issues and solutions relating pages and files that underwent cut-and-paste moves (which its history has to be put back together), and inappropriate merging/overwriting (of which its history needs to be split).


History mergingEdit

Because most users have the ability to use the move page function, cut-and-paste moves are usually done by people who are not aware of that function, or when the move function fails (e.g. because the target has history), and people who aren't aware of the Administrators Noticeboard forum to ask for help from an administrator.

When a cut-and-paste move is done, the page history of a page can be split among two or more different pages. This is very undesirable, because we need to keep the history with the content for copyright reasons. In most circumstances, administrators are able to fix this by merging page histories.

Instructions for admins
  1. Temporarily delete NewPage
  2. Move OldPage to NewPage, using the move functionality. (In case it is a file, you have to open the Move & Replace link in a new tab or disable AjaxQuickDelete in your preferences.) (Now the old history versions are the whole of the new title’s.)
  3. Undelete the NewPage page, by:
    1. Viewing the page/file history
    2. Clicking “View or restore … deleted edits?”, and
    3. Clicking on “Restore!”. (Now the new title’s history has both the old and new versions, including an extra copy of the most recent version of OldPage, created by the move tool.)
  4. At this stage, NewPage will only show the text “#REDIRECT NewPage” (assuming a redirect was the most recent version of OldPage, the NewPage page will now be showing whatever the most recent version of OldPage was). The last step is to revert (or RevisionDelete) to the last version of NewPage from before the move.

Special:MergeHistory makes it possible to automatically merge the history of two pages.

History splittingEdit

Over time, pages or files may change from one underlying topic to a completely separate topic. Normally, this should be accomplished through moves of pages, or by reuploading an altered file on a slightly different title. However, if a user is unfamiliar with those processes they may simply change the subject of a page or file (overwriting the old). If this is not caught immediately it is very easy for the new topic to build up a substantial edit history of its own.

Instructions for admins
  1. Temporarily delete the page/file (original title)
  2. Restore previous revisions up to (but not including) the point where the topic was changed.
  3. Move (without redirect) the restored versions (old topic) to the desired new title. (In case it is a file, you have to open the Move & Replace link in a new tab or disable AjaxQuickDelete in your preferences.)
    • If there’s already a file or page under the new title and you wish to histmerge into it:
    a) select the “delete the existing article” option, while moving;
    b) restore deleted revisions of new title.
  4. Restore new revisions of new topic (still at original title).

A history merge could also be undone in this way.

Requesting a merge or splitEdit

To request a merge or split, fill the following template, and submit it at the bottom of this page. Remember, both files need to be of the same type. Merging of more than two files may also be possible in some cases.

== [[:FILE/PAGE 1]] → [[:FILE/PAGE 2]] ==
* Request: [Split or Merge]
* Reason:
  • For merges, replace FILE/PAGE 2 with the page you want FILE/PAGE 1 contents to be merged into.
  • For splits, replace FILE/PAGE 2 with the new filename which you want the newer content to be moved from FILE/PAGE 1.

Current requests

View Edit Add topic

Workaround → FlowRoot-SVGEdit

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

RE: Moving photo from Wikipedia to Wikimedia CommonsEdit


Could a moderator please move this file to Wikimedia Commons? It has been recommended to move a couple of times but nobody ever got around to moving it and I couldn't understand the description about how to move it myself. I didn't take the photo.


Darren J. Prior (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Darren J. PriorDarren J. Prior (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

@Darren J. Prior:   Done, now it just needs to be deleted from English Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know how to delete it from the English Wikipedia. I'll leave that to someone with the know-how. Thanks again! :) Darren J. Prior (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Darren J. PriorDarren J. Prior (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

@Darren J. Prior: You're welcome!   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:14, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpgEdit

The last editor claims to have made only minor changes. It's not like he just did a simple color correction. Well, you can overlook the fact that the brightness has been changed. However, one can't see over the stamping out of a natural reflection with a faulty retouching (in a more technical aspect, beneath the word CHEMIE). This manipulation was unnecessary and justifies a revert to the original version. If at all, the new editing should be uploaded as a separate file, so that such differences immediately could be noticed (the comparability of original and editing is, inter alia, a purpose of our guideline about "overwriting existing files"). MagentaGreen (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

See alsoEdit