Open main menu

Commons:Kandidate für exzellänti Bilder

Uff derre Site findsch Bilder, wo d Allmänd-Nutzer für bsunders güet halte und sällewäg in d Galery vo de Exzellänte Bilder uffgnoh hän. Stimm mit ab!

Obacht: D Abstimmig betrifft nit s Bild vom Dag!



Bild vorschlaEdit

Wenn dr e Bild gfunde häsch, wo dr für bsunders glunge haltsch, no chasch dem Gleich folge und's yfiege. Dodezüe müesch kei Chonto ha; Vorschläg ßin au vo anonyme Nutzer willcho.

Bitte stell im Fall vo-n-re Nominierig unbedingt sicher, dass s Bild e geigneti Bildbeschrybig und Lizänz hät.


  • De Abstimmigs-Zitruum isch 14 Dag. Am 15. Dag wird s Ergebnis festgstellt.
  • Au anonymi Nutzer chönne e Bild vorschla und an de Diskussione deilneh
  • Stimmabgabe vo IP-Adrässe werre nit zällt.

E Kandidat wird in d Galery vo de uszeichnete Bilder uffgnoh, wenn

  • 's e geigneti Lizänz hät
  • Mindestens 5 Nutzer defür ßin
  • d Azahl Pro-Stimme mindestens doppelt so groß isch wie die vo de Kontra-Stimme (neutrali Stimme zälle nit).


Gstimmt cha mit {{Pro}} (defür), {{Contra}} (defür) und {{Neutral}}.

Neue Kandidat dezüefiege

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Kinvara - Dunguaire Castle - 20180706210924.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2019 at 03:25:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur "Körper und Seele" -- 2019 -- 3997.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2019 at 09:09:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Can you explain what makes this photo special please. -- Colin (talk) 09:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's another view and another composition. I think the view is not comparable with the other. I like it with the yellow lines at the bottom, the yellow column and the the yellow sculpture. --XRay talk 10:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This angle doesn't really work for me. I like the image where the sculpture is the main subject, but here the subject is not really clear.--Peulle (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nelli Matula - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 1.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2019 at 07:37:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment For me that's the biggest part of the appeal. --MB-one (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Having a light in an unusual position can add to the photo and add a new dimension to the compo (1 or 2), like it could symbolize her clear light voice or something. This looks more like she is about to be possessed by an alien light entity. I might have seen too many sci-fi movies... --Cart (talk) 12:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2019 at 00:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by Philippe Halsman, uploaded by Trialsanderrors, nominated by Yann (talk) 00:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support In the previous nomination, there were some concerns about the copyright. I think these are relieved, as the deletion was closed as kept. If someone has a better suggestion for the category, welcome. --Yann (talk) 00:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Iconic Dalí's madness picture. I prefer Commons:Featured pictures/Historical. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - That's bizarre as hell and I like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Finally something crazier than my photos. :-) --Cart (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support It's completely nuts. :) --Peulle (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Louis Brandeis statue by Robert Berks.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 23:35:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by Robert Berks - uploaded by Kzirkel - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment COM:FOP US No FoP for sculptures --A.Savin 23:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
    • @A.Savin: “In addition, any public artwork installed before 1978 without a copyright notice is also in the public domain (unless the copyright owner actively prevented anyone from copying or photographing the work until 1978).😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.07.03.-22-Glubig-Melang-Fliess Wendisch Rietz--Weisse Seerose.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 11:57:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Chorumgang -- 2019 -- 3920.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 06:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • During the nomination of the photograph I got the same idea. Now I'm sure. I'll crop out the bottom as soon as possible. Thank you. --XRay talk 07:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done It's now 4:3 - and it's better. --XRay talk 13:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It is indeed better. I'm undecided on whether to support, though, I think mainly because of the top, which is quite difficult to figure out an optimal crop for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I can understand any decision. The top was a difficult decision too. For the whole top the image should be made with an aspect ratio of 1:2 or 1:3. IMO too much. --XRay talk 09:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Giant anteater at MAV-USP.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 19:43:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

@Lucasbosch, Boothsift: you are both requesting something impossible. The pole holds the whole body, there is a reason why is so close to the legs... the sustainability.
@Yann: the background is more clear, and the bone is more close to the reality, that said, I can bring down the brightness. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 03:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 12:01:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Wells Cathedral Nave Photograph.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

MAV CanidaeEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:33:09 (UTC)

  •   Info Bases on previous discussion, I gather all Canidae skeletons displayed at MAV - edited by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton - uploaded by Joalpe and Sturm - nominated by -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - There are certainly differences in the way these skeletons are photographed. For example, some are yellower or darker than others. But overall, this is a notable achievement, even if a little eerie. Also, it's fitting but in a way odd that one of the skeletons is of a mutt, because there are so many different mixtures possible in a mutt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't see how this is different to Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/MAV I. Canidae is a huge family of creatures. As others have noted, I wouldn't expect a collection of Lez's shells to be nominated as a set, or a collection of Jee's butterflies to be nominated as a set. The final one (Saint Bernard dog) is poor quality. As the FP page says: "Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats". Here we have a few species/breeds of canids: there are 34 species, and hundreds of breeds of dogs. The fact that this may be the entire collection currently at MAV isn't IMO enough to make this a set, it just tells me that their collection is rather limited. -- Colin (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Basile is right below about the blown highlights. Yann (talk) 19:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Certainly good VI candidates, but this one is relatively small and the head is unsharp, this one has blown highlights. I don't think each of them would be promoted if they were nominated separately, thus I don't see why they should be as a set -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Sturm (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Joalpe como sempre com as melhores contribuições fotográficas. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basile. – Lucas 22:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Great collective work. And thanks, ArionEstar ;) --Joalpe (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rosie the Riveter (Vultee) DS.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 20:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

-- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • You can read the various arguments at en:wp but they are a bit dated (2008) with concerns about large file size (not sure why since WP only displays a thumb). Since Commons is a media repository, and any of the other edits can be derived from the original, and there isn't really anything wrong with the original other than being huge and a little soft if you pixel-peep, I think we should support the original version. Yann, could you offer that as an alt? -- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)



  •   Support --Yann (talk) 09:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Colin. Historic photo and quite good quality, no need for any kind of digital restoration or other tinkering. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Impressive quality for a 76-year old photograph. Here's this version at the same resolution than the one above -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Colin (talk) 10:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Colin. Abzeronow (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   SupportNice historic photo. 😄--BoothSift 02:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ryan Hodnett (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support She's a woman, she's black, and she's working in a factory in 1943. This is one of the reasons the allies won the war.--Peulle (talk) 09:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
+1 Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 22:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

fixed tilted, thanks!!! @Uoaei1: Ezarateesteban 16:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Now it is leaning even more --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think the picture might need cropping a little on the right hand side. Look in the bottom right corner - there are a few white pixels. Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
See now @Cmao20: --Ezarateesteban 23:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. The motif looks quite ordinary. I´m not sure, whether there is enough wow if it becomes technically perfect.--Milseburg (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

  SupportMarinna (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Neither the light nor the composition are very successful in my view. Beside, there's a problem at the top right of the image with an intrusive white line, suggesting a bad crop after perspective correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Or a tilt correction. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The technical flaws—what Basile saw, the still-off perspective and the considerable purple fringing around almost every sharp edge—are correctable, but when they are I still won't see an FP here, because of all the clutter at the bottom. Not your fault, but long narrow images like this generally work best when we can look from bottom to top without much to distract. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:MosMetro KomsomolskayaKL img2 asv2018-01.jpg (delist and replace)Edit

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 15:43:54 (UTC)


  •   Info Komsomolskaya-KL station of Moscow Metro, all by A.Savin. Here is the original nomination. Now, after some consideration, I have reworked the second picture a bit to give more pleasant levels etc. Although there are no trains, I find this one better, also given the more generous crop on the ceiling. This crop is not possible on the first image. I also think, maybe, it is even better without trains, as they obscure some detail on the wall and they itself are not that nice. So, all in all I think the photo w/o trains should be featured and the photo with trains should then be delisted, because it's very similar.
  •   Delist and replace --A.Savin 15:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace - I prefer the proposed replacement because it's brighter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Cart (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace per Ikan. The new one is quite simply better. Thanks for keeping FPC up to date. :) --Peulle (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
    Note however that the second one is not new -- it was taken+uploaded at the same time as the first one. --A.Savin 11:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg Kaiserburg obere Kapelle 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 10:07:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
  •   Info Interior of the upper chapel of the Imperial Castle, Nuremberg, Middle Franconia, Bavaria, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral The photo is not completely balanced for me. The pillar on the right is cut off at the top. The crucifix in the middle is also somewhat unhappy with regard to the window. The light on the right is also a bit disturbing for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Overall a good quality interior, even considering the above criticisms. Cmao20 (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The pillar on the left is not vertical. At the bottom, there's a disturbing dark part (not horizontal). Shame also the view is asymmetrical. The right pillar is cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Nothing so special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yeah it doesn't quite make me go "wow" either.--Peulle (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Slight perspective/distortion issue noted by Basile, awkward crop on left and distracting highlight in upper right. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 018-033 PAN.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 18:58:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info Full panoramic (360 degrees) view of the unique landscape around Deadvlei, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia. All by me, Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support You liked (and promoted) the last pano from the area, this one is IMHO even more impressive, much bigger and of higher quality. -- Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The previous one had an excellent composition, sadly not all 360 degrees panoramas share that quality no matter how big they are. IMO a normal jpeg is often an inferior medium for this kind of panorama since the composition tends to look a bit random. See note. --Cart (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♠ 00:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Info Interesting photo to see the difference of ground in front of / behind the dune. But the composition is completely unbalanced. Two areas cut in the center and the dunes on the sides it does not work for me.
  •   Support I do get what people mean about this not being the most balanced or aesthetic composition, but the immense resolution and detail make this an impressive technical feat and an important and useful document. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support. There is a very small stitching error along the ridgeline to the right of the peak at rear. But the only way you'll see it (other than randomly coming across it like I have) is if you go looking for it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Weather observations in Antarctica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 17:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info created & uploaded by Tsy1980 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The place where this photo was taken is wow, but the main person is looking down (and that is not really impressive) --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - She's looking down to get her footing in the snow, I think. I like the form, the interesting apparatus and the stark snowscape with an incline in the distance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unnatural way of walking which indicates discomfort of receiving a photo --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - I particularly like the way she walks minding her steps so she doesn't stumble in this unnatural environment for humans.--G Furtado (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Not the most recent image, but still impressive --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I do like the Hoth-ish atmosphere in this, but the composition just isn't awesome. To have someone centered in that vast emptiness looks unbalanced to me, a more panoramic view with more space left or right would have been nice. --Cart (talk) 10:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Simple but effective composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Michiel and Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 05.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 15:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
  •   Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Could be a good VI, but I'm not awestruck by the composition, and I'd prefer a more nearly dead-on view of the tower. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I like the colours, and composition seems OK. We’ve certainly promoted much worse night photography. Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Those colorful lights (green at the left, blue in the center) are too disco for me. Also the composition doesn't work in my view, with this intrusive wall on the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Couple of teenagers riding a jestski splashing on the Mekong in Laos.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 10:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I think you are right, this compo is better. The other one also has a disturbing log in the background. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♠ 00:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Strong support For once a picture of Basile's from the rivers of Laos that doesn't involve bamboo bridges or tropical landscapes  . Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langkofel group from Sellajoch Col Rodella Fassa.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 22:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural#Italy

File:Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 21:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  •   Info created by Teevee - uploaded by User:Teevee - nominated by Teevee -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice portrait, good composition. --Yann (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Yann. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 07:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Poco2 12:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Not sure about the title though since Kalle Lindroth is not in the picture. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support but misleading filename should be changed --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Crop on both sides is too tight. Also the guitar below shouldn't be cut. --Hockei (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Here is another one with the whole guitar and a bit more air on the right. I feel the focus a bit too far in the back in this one. --Teevee (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Smial (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Some small faults but given how hard it is to get this kind of shot right and how much does go right with it, I'm letting them go. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People

File:Galerie Perrotin Ceiling Detail.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 20:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  •   Info created and uploaded by ComedyAmy - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 23:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I like these kind of image very much. But IMO it is important, that the image is centered and the horizontal lines are horizontal. It's fixable. There are artifacts and problems mit sharpness too. May be this is not fixable. --XRay talk 07:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per XRay. Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Vihorlat (v zime) 046.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 19:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Info It can be fixed to make it look better. But I don't know if that low cloud was actually in the plane. I had a problem with it on several photos of that day. --Milan Bališin (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose until the tilt is fixed. Yann (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • There is still a tilt IMO. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Question I don't know, it seems so straight to me? --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support. If the horizon is tilted, I'm sure you'll fix it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Needs a lot of brightening, snow should be white. -- King of ♠ 01:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Question - Why should it be white when it's reflecting what looks like late afternoon light near sundown? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Info It was taken about an hour before sunset. The sun colored the snow into “yellow”. The sunset was around 15:30. The photo was taken at 14:37 (It was Golden hour). --Milan Bališin (talk) 09:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I'll have to   Oppose the image in its current state then. -- King of ♠ 00:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment More photos of the day in The Gallery. On several photos, the snow is yellow (when the sun sets). --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support, but a bit per Yann and a bit per King (It was my first impression too. Maybe it's slightly too warm.). --Hockei (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I think that the lighting and above all the scenery had lots of FP potential, but I am not quite convinced about the composition here. I'd would probably focused more on a spot where the effect of the wind to the snow/ice is predominant --Poco2 12:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Slightly colder WB. would probably be nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Did you sleep up there? --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Image is overcategorized. --A.Savin 13:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • For example "Vihorlat + Views from Vihorlat", "Frost + White frost", "Golden hour + Golden hour landscapes",... and many more --A.Savin 17:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I have the impression that you are not thinking for yourself... --A.Savin 17:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Help me if there's something else wrong. Thanks. --Milan Bališin (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - He's right. Just to give a few examples: How can you have categories for both Vihorlat and Vihorlat (národná prírodná rezervácia)? It's obvious that one is a parent of the other, isn't it? At the very least, it's redundant. Also, you have numerous snow categories and then "Snow scenery", an obvious parent category. And isn't "Winter landscapes" a parent for one of the other categories? I want you to clean this up before it's featured, and I may have to join A.Savin in opposing if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done I cleared it. I don't know if that's ok. --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Much better, but how is Kyjov (vrch vo Vihorlatských vrchoch) different from Vihorlat? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment They are two separate peaks. See notes in the photo. --Milan Bališin (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Got it. I think your categories are good now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose nothing special. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice montane winter mood. Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Saint-Michel church in Fontenoy (DSCF5104) Antoing, Belgium.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 18:36:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
  •   Info by User:Trougnouf
  •   Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, no wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Nothing special. The tree obstructs the church. Yann (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. A QI and possibly a VI, but not a great composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support This one is OK for me. If the sky was bright and blue I have a feeling it would have got a lot more support. But a grey sky doesn’t bother me, and the composition looks good - it’s often tough to find a better angle to shoot churches from I think. Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you. I really like the light in this picture, with the beginning of civil twilight even though the sky is cloudy there is a blue tint to it and it lights up the church beautifully imo. I think the tree is a feature, I like the way it stands next to this modest church and being the right time of the year it doesn't block the view (in contrast with the other version where I unexpectedly happened to bicycle to the same spot again five months later and the tree is too prominent). --Trougnouf (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too ordinary in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Vue panoramique du château et de l'arsenal en Penfeld 3Fi079-242.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Merci beaucoup pour cette réponse detaillée. Je n'aurais pas pensé qu'un carte si grand serait possible. C'est tres interessant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Quite an interesting postcard Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good scan of an unusual old item/memorabilia/postcard. Info added to description on file page. (À propos, même si {{LangSwitch}} est élégant, il peut cacher des informations qui ne sont disponibles que dans une des langues des autres lecteurs. Je l'ai changé en description multilingue.) --Cart (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart and Cmao20. This photo should also be nominated at VIC, regardless of whether it passes FPC or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support avec le supplément d'information. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Doesn't work so well for me.--Peulle (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Interesting historically to see such a colored card -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Soutiens per les autres. Daniel Case (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Walters Ranch Hop Kiln in 2019.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 02:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.


  •   Comment Thanks for the feedback. Here's a new, less cluttered version with stronger perpective correction. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment It needs some perspective correction, otherwise looking good --Poco2 12:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Poco, which direction? I'm somewhat lost. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
No, no tilt here, just missing vertical perspective correction to get the verticals vertical (see verticals on the right side leaning in) --Poco2 17:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version. Please note that the building itself isn't straight. Nor are the poles on the right. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). (d.j.b.) 18.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 17:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Rain
  •   Info This looks like a black and white photo, but it isn't. During heavy rain showers it seemed. that all colors disappeared and there was this grim atmosphere. Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). Stormy wind and heavy rain showers above Langweerderwielen.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   SupportLucas 17:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Doesn't quite speak to me.--Peulle (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - There's a dust spot right in the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Quite artistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lack of details for this relatively small resolution. The trees are unsharp and like noisy. I also find this monochromatic picture a bit depressing -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 10:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support It is very difficult to capture the concept of 'wind' and rain since even if you and your camera are almost blown away, things usually look rather still in the resulting photo and the rain becomes frozen in a misty layer obscuring details. Also hard to balance the shutter time; if you want visible rain streaks, you get very blurry plants. Here the patterns of bending reeds and gushing water help to make visible the movement of wind and rain. The mono color also helps to bring out the ominous mood in the photo. Category changed to "Rain" since there are no geographical sub-categories in "Natural phenomena". --Cart (talk) 10:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Peulle. -- Karelj (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I also find it a bit depressing but that's what I like about the photo :) I also like how the plants grow directly from the waves. Otherwise per Cart. But Famberhorst, please add en English description. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you for your comment. W.carter has now added an English description. Thank you very much.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Podzemnik Poco2 12:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I'd like to support it. But I cannot be a friend of the monochrome, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- This is what water in the Netherlands looks like, quite often. :) Artistic and/or depressing? Yes, both... MartinD (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Cart. --BoothSift 03:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833.gifEdit

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 03:55:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I don't understand. Please could you explain which "reason" you're talking about ? Source. For me this is an awesome testimony of an amazing invention -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I find the effect of all the rats running at me unpleasant, but now that I realize this is meant to replicate a historic invention, I've crossed out my oppose vote. I'd support this for VI, but I still don't think a moving GIF actually has the same effect as the Phenakistiscope, because it's so common to see moving GIFs online. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, this is a modern technique applied to a 186 year-old document. Personally, I like the kaleidoscopic effect of this creation. But not animated, it would be very static for what it's supposed to show. Yes of course today moving GIFs are common online, but the phenakistiscope is regarded as one of the first forms of moving media entertainment that paved the way for the future motion picture and film industry. Today many trendy websites bring these old precursor drawings to the light. This piece is certainly one of the best quality and highest resolution we can find on the web in 2019 -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • But in the original technique, didn't you just look at "one" of running rats (or procession of rats) through a slit? Like this image shows. Just seeing one running rat would be less dizzying. Seeing this multi-rat version is only possible with gif. Or? --Cart (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This works like an optical illusion. The retinal persistence is the secret behind these animations. The GIF linked above is also an approximation. Through the hole, in reality we would see 10% images, by interruption at regular intervals, and 90% black foreground (that would be much more dizzying IMO). The advantage here is to see both the whole wheel and the animation. Hypnotizing for many viewers    . Today young and creative designers like Ana Taberko use this old invention for modern designs (it sounds like we can make new dishes with old good recipes). Similar FP in German and Persian Wikipedia -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 01:03:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  •   Info all by me Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. The composition looks off with an important object, the ring, cut off awkardly along with her second arm. In general the setting doesn't become clear: why has she the ring? Does the crowd behind her have something to do with it? Does she smile for the crowd or some individual? As it is no story is told and it makes it look like a random snapshot. – Lucas 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Lucasbosch: it was a protest so there was a lot of people and a very difficult place to take photos, the ring is a tool to protest Ezarateesteban 13:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please give a proper name to this file. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The background is kind of noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: I applied a bit denoising but I think that is acceptable for this kind of photos, thanks and regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Weak support but I would like more space at the bottom. Yann (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded the entire photo without cropping, a lot of people around me, difficult to take phots, thanks Yann!!
  •   Comment I think a picture like this maybe needs a better caption to clarify what's going on. What was the protest about, and how is the ring being used as a tool for the protest? If I understood this, I'd be happy to support because the image quality is superb, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks @Cmao20:, I was there as Commons's photographer, I don't have too much idea about this topic, but I investigate in Wikipedia and I improve a bit the description, Regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Wonderful, and thanks for making the effort. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Very, very good composition --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Lucas, the cut-off ring doesn't work for me. -- King of ♠ 01:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Marinna (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Lucas --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Good picture indeed, but the inevitable background distracts me enough for me not to consider it great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Jalu (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The ring just messes the picture up for me. --BoothSift 02:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment - I can see that only if I really pixel-peep at full size. Is that what you're doing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment I can see some of them in the preview and other zoom levels as irregular shapes that could be clouds, but really are the artefacts. Again, the ones placed right above the highest peak are the best example. – Lucas 08:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Moroder: I put notes on your high contrast image. The posterization is a sudden change in brightness and has an irregular shape. – Lucas 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I would call those cirrostratus clouds (Schleierwolken). I don't see any posterisation on my Eizo monitor --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's possible that there was the "edge" of a cloud at the parting line originally, but as I see it something in the capture and/or post-processing (not necessarily your fault) made a harsh split of tones out of it there, with some speckles inbetween. I don't want to belabor this any more, I see artifacts that I'm convinced are not natural, but if I am alone in this it's okay. I hope it's not caused by my monitor ... – Lucas 17:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Needs theme music ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support A bit warm with regard to color temperature for my taste, but still a fantastic shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Brilliant. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok, it's an alp, so I'm not a fan. But a very, very good photo of an alp. My own photos of this view and the Dolomites are unfortunately lost. --Cart (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Amazing resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support It's tempting to print it off and put on my wall. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Amazing quality like a beautiful painting, however, posterization on the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, there is some mild posterization going on in the sky (Lucas, your monitor is OK). It is difficult to see because there is still some structure in the posterized areas: It takes place in the clouds, but it is very clearly an artifact of digital processing. I'd prefer to see this fixed, but it is a minor issue. --El Grafo (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Carloz Schwabe - Vincent d'Indy's Fervaal.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 12:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada 13.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:42:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
  •   Info All by me. It's an office building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Abstain as author. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I really dislike this type of architecture, but you've captured it very well. Cmao20 (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Cmao20 --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Weirdly enough, I think I'm starting to enjoy brutalism … I like how the various installations on the roof make it look like the bridge section of an ocean liner. --El Grafo (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 18:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I know the light trails are unavoidable with a 30-second exposure at that time of night, but that doesn't make them less distracting to me. They focus way too much of my attention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very nice light, but this modern building is really ordinary. Beside, I find the colors oversaturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others – Lucas 08:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment I didn't make any saturation adjustments, it's just the end of the blue hour. I had a version without the light trails, too, but I found this one more entertaining. The building is by a busy highway and I thought including the light trails would be a good representation of it. --Podzemnik (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Perhaps vibrance is too strong, as the yellows are very intense. Concerning the light trails, I agree they're distracting because the street is partly cut. They look intrusive, since they strike out both the sign and the building, making the composition really busy at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♠ 01:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Basile Morin; This image is in good quality, but the building is very ordinary. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per above, you did a good job but I don't see this subject featureable --Poco2 12:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as per others, after much pondering. Yann (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Chapel Interior 4, Royal Holloway, University of London - Diliff.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:22:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The spots on the wall lit by the sun look pretty awkward, like a blur --Poco2 12:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Poco --Milseburg (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Poco pointing it out. --BoothSift 02:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Planken Wambuis locatie omgeving Mossel.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 17:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena #Fog.
  •   Info Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice fog picture. --Hockei (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautifully atmospheric and a clear FP. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Love the fog and the location, but the image is not quite there for me. It lacks a clear subject or compositional idea for me: Neither the raspberry (?) scrub on the left nor the tree/hedge on the right are particularly interesting, but they dominate the scene, distracting from the nice-looking tree in the background. Or, if you say they are supposed to be the subject, then that nice-looking tree in the background distracts from that. The white balance is too warm for my taste, makes it look more like a sand storm rather than a foggy day. Or maybe not warm enough, if this was a golden hour shot (but it doesn't look like one to me) --El Grafo (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with El Grafo. The two shrubs, left and right, are not very nice and distract from the two central trees. I don't mind the WB, but the composition doesn't convince me. As an artistic photo, with mainly fog and no distinct subject, we need a better disposition of the elements in this space. Perhaps too much random here, or only shapes almost hidden. Immediately my eyes go to the right and feel not rewarded -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others: Nice mood, but the composition doesn't really add up fully for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Ikan, it doesn't come through completely. --Cart (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Still a nice idea. I'd have probably supported if the 3 trees would have looked similar (kind of pattern) Poco2 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Very typical Dutch weather. :) MartinD (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2 set.jpgEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 06:11:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.