Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

Commons:Kandidater till utvalda bilder

Det här är kandidater till att bli utvalda bilder.

För ett arkiv av tidigare nominerade se: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Det finns också en kronologisk lista av utvalda bilder.

NomineringEdit

Om du tror att du har funnit eller skapat en bild som kan anses värdefull, lägg till den här nedan i sektionen för nomineringar, högst upp i listan, med hjälp av den här länken (Hjälp). För det behöver du inte ha en inloggning, även anonyma användare får nominera.

Men innan du nominerar, kolla upp så att bilden har lämplig bildbeskrivning och licens.

OmröstningsreglerEdit

  • Röstningen pågår i 9 dagar. På den 10:e dagen blir resultatet fastställt.
  • Om en bild efter 5 dagar inte fått någon mer positiv röst än från den som nominerade, så kan kandidaten tas bort ifrån sidan.
  • Nomineringar ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare är välkomna
  • Bidrag ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare till diskussionen är välkomna
  • Röstning från oinloggade bidragsgivare räknas inte
  • En nominering räknas inte som en röst, men den som nominerar får rösta
  • Den som nominerar en bild kan när som helst ta bort bilden ifrån omröstningen

En kandidat kommer att bli en utvald bild om följande krav uppfylls:

  • Lämplig licens (så klart)
  • Minst 5 stödjande röster
  • Förhållande mellan stödjande/motsättande röster på minst 2/1 (minst två tredjedels majoritet)
  • Två olika versioner av samma bild kan inte båda bli utvalda; endast den med högst antal stödjande röster blir utvald.

Röstning kan göras med "{{Support}}" (stöd) eller "{{Oppose}}" (ej stöd), neutralitet kan anges med "{{Neutral}}".

KandidaterEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 13:33:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  •   Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Better as a head shot I think; the head is very detailed, the body isn't good. Charles (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Charles's suggestion. Daniel Case (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Don't see what is wrong with the body. There's a nice pattern of shades of grey and is sharp all the way down the neck. That provides a good contrast and mirror for the head and crown. -- Colin (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Викиекспедиција Бојмија 056.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 06:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info created by M.pvsk - uploaded by M.pvsk - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose In my opinion, the mountain should be sharper than the leaves in front of it. With the white balance, I'm not sure if if the WB is correct.--Ermell (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment - The colors look strange to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Whitebalance way too blue, oversaturated and once that is corrected the end-result is not very wow-y. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 10:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Measured oppose per Cart. This view seems to me to have potential for a featurable image, but not like this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Нежилови Стени над море од облаци.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 06:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Yellow insects on yellow marigold.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 01:26:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • When they're busy at work, these small animals are not so fearful. Then one can approach them quite close. I was manually shooting this yellow butterfly when a wasp arrived on my flower. Immediately I tried to focus on it, and among three shots, one got sharp (and that was enough). The butterfly is a montage from three shots. Once I had those both, I could take all my time to focus on the front of the flower (three more useful shots), even if the insects moved, the most difficult was won -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 07:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Nice work. Will support if you reduce highlights/overexposure on the butterfly. Wet season form? Good to specify for an FP. Charles (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good thinking with the stacking process and a very good result. --Cart (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support very good! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Solid. Daniel Case (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Colin (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:San Sebastian Donostia Panoramic 1190583.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2018 at 20:43:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  •   Info View of San Sebastian with Zurriola Beach and the mouth of the river Urumea. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ezarateesteban 00:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice dynamics, something interesting to see in every part of the frame. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Great shot and super detail. Charles (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:African buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer) male with cattle egret.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2018 at 09:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  •   Info As many of us know, our hair thins when we get older. There are several reasons why this buffalo has rolled in mud: for cooling; to acquire a sunscreen; and to keep parasites off his skin. Mud is his mineral-rich face pack - and when it dries it will fall off taking embedded ticks with it. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Charles (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good light, good compo and an excellent -"Monday, this must be Monday..." photo. Getting rid of a few pixels up top for balance and cleaner background would make it even greater. See note. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Good idea. Charles (talk) 13:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Andoin - Cascadas de la Tobería -BT- 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 20:08:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Thank you, Daniel! The image is only a small part of a series of cascades and the incredible thing is that this waterfall is quite unknown even to the people living in the province here. And it's an absolute magic location! --Basotxerri (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Very true, and I have a couple of other favorites that I'll be waiting for. :) --Cart (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Malachite kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus cristatus) Namibia.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 16:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I'm afraid not. Size is around 13cm, so I'm actually about 6m away. Charles (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img100 Ertale.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 09:25:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   I don't think it is possible to get such a photo tack sharp. I got blurry heat haze on a summer's day, just imagine what this place must generate. --Cart (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Pirogue and tiny wooded island reflecting in the water.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 01:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 20:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 16:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) - view from Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 13:26:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:McClures Beach, Point Reyes National Seashore.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 11:30:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

those rocks are impassable, usually birds stay sleeping in the same positon or jump directly to fly --The Photographer 17:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose. To me the left crop is at an awkward place, and the large rock formation in the middle is too centered. -- King of ♠ 17:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 19:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but it looks oversharpened --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, it looks a little oversharpened but I'm forgiving that as a byproduct of the long exposure. Otherwise, I love it ... reminds me of a Roger Dean album cover, perhaps Drama, with rocks hitting the same angle as the ice on that one. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Sure, there's some randomness to the left and right crops, but I love what's there - the tall rocks with a pair of gulls on them and the profusion of mussels, in particularly -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Cinque dita 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 06:22:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A good but also a quite common mountain portrait. The mast on the right side is leaning in. --Milseburg (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
    •   Done The mast is vertical now --Llez (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
      • Yes, the tilt of the mast is gone but the problem is retouched badly. This becomes clearer while comparing the mountain station in the current version with the former one. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
        • You are right, there was a mistake in the correction. I uploaded a new version, please have again a look on it and compare with the previous (bad) correction --Llez (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support A bit soft but it looks like this was the best that could be done. Lovely colors and light. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Nicely composed and an interesting subject. Technically it's all you can get out of the 500D as far as I know from my own experience. --Code (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Striking, but the sky is a bit blotchy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Entzia - Paisaje -BT- 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2018 at 17:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain
  •   Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've chosen B&W for this because lack of interesting colours, the sun was already quite high and it was hazy. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice atmosphere. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 19:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Quite good, very nice undulating landscape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I understand the situation, but nonetheless: B&W for this kind of landscape doesn't work for me, sorry. --A.Savin 23:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • No problem, that's a matter of tastes. Thank you for your opinion! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Weak support It could be stronger if you lost that cloud from the upper left. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 11:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent!!, please try remode the upper left cloud --The Photographer 13:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Theatinerkirche Munich, March 2018.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2018 at 07:55:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Support Ahhh... clear skies. :) --Cart (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Great composition and mood, but could something be done about the oversharpening? Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks, Daniel. I honestly don't think the image is oversharpened, though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Onça do Pantanal.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 21:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I've got this lens and know how better it can be at 400mm, handheld with the stabilization. But the subject is interesting enough to strike my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support a great, possibly iconic shot that just shouldn't be overly pixelpeeped... honestly, I don't know what could have been done better. Equipment and exif look perfectly fine to me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I've seen jaguars in the Pantanal and they are not that colour. Charles (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I disagree the sharpness is an issue. The technical quality seems fine for a 400mm telephoto. At 6MP it looks completely sharp and would print A4 just fine. Charles, what specifically is wrong with the colour? Do you think the white balance is wrong? Surely the colour will change somewhat depending on ambient light. -- Colin (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Colour is too orange - check out the colour of the eyes - no other images on Google show this colour. Charles (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • If you take away the ambient soft yellow light and make the WB totally neutral (I did that in PS), you can see that there is something orange reflected in the jaguar's eyes. Orange is a preferred color to wear among some game keepers (and hunters) since many animals are color blind and they perceive it as grey while we humans can see each other even in dense foliage. This might be something like that reflecting. --Cart (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • No it's not a reflection. 400mm lens. It's a false colour. Charles (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support, along similar lines as Martin. This reminds me of an illustration from "Where the Wild Things Are", except that it's a real wild thing and a real photo. Also reminds me of paintings by Le Douanier Rousseau. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support This is a picture more than a photo (and those are rare here at FPC) so composition and wow overrules technical pixel-peep-perfection. The overall light in the pic is warm, creating an ambiance, so it's normal that the jaguar gets a hint of that tone too. --Cart (talk) 11:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per above. -- Colin (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --El Grafo (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart -- P999 (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart. Mood makes me think of the cover of Fleetwood Mac's Tango in the Night. It has imperfections, yes, but those imperfections are what gives it its impact. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Not perfect, yet close to it --A.Savin 23:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Granada (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO wow factor there is. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 07:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Vieux Crabe (ship, 1951), Sète.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 18:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Image:Vistas Alcazaba Almería.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 14:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Paisaje cerca de la mina de Collahuasi, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 16-21 PAN.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2018 at 18:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

@Poco a poco: Which makes this image all the more extraordinary ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Question - How many degrees is this panorama? It would be good to include that in the file description, too, I think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
    Ikan, it is aprox. 200 degrees (the road on left and right side is the same), I added it to the file description, along with the geodata (middle of nowhere) Poco2 07:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Straßburg Pöckstein 1 Schlosspark Monopteros 11102016 4827.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2018 at 13:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:HarryTruman.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2018 at 08:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 44th edit. --Cart (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose We have thousands of paintings, many more impressive than this one. Good, but not FP. Yann (talk) 04:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


Ta bort utvald-status ifrån bilderEdit

Efterhand kan standarden för utvalda bilder ändras. Bilder som tidigare var tillräckligt bra, kanske inte längre anses vara det. Här listas bilder som du tycker inte längre förtjänar att vara utvalda bilder. Då behövs 2/3 majoritet (och minst 5 röster) som håller med om att ta bort utvald-statusen ifrån bilden. Om inte 2/3 av de röstande håller med om att ta bort den, så är bilden fortsatt utvald. Här röstar man med {{Keep}} (bilden förtjänar att kvarstå som utvald) or {{Delist}} (bilden förtjänar inte att kvarstå som utvald). När du nominerar en bild här, ta med länken till den ursprungliga utvald-bild-nomineringen (den finns under Länkar på bildens beskrivningssida. Använd den här länken för att lägga till en borttags-kandidat.

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 13:33:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  •   Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Better as a head shot I think; the head is very detailed, the body isn't good. Charles (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Charles's suggestion. Daniel Case (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Don't see what is wrong with the body. There's a nice pattern of shades of grey and is sharp all the way down the neck. That provides a good contrast and mirror for the head and crown. -- Colin (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Викиекспедиција Бојмија 056.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 06:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info created by M.pvsk - uploaded by M.pvsk - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose In my opinion, the mountain should be sharper than the leaves in front of it. With the white balance, I'm not sure if if the WB is correct.--Ermell (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment - The colors look strange to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Whitebalance way too blue, oversaturated and once that is corrected the end-result is not very wow-y. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 10:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Measured oppose per Cart. This view seems to me to have potential for a featurable image, but not like this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Нежилови Стени над море од облаци.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 06:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Yellow insects on yellow marigold.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2018 at 01:26:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • When they're busy at work, these small animals are not so fearful. Then one can approach them quite close. I was manually shooting this yellow butterfly when a wasp arrived on my flower. Immediately I tried to focus on it, and among three shots, one got sharp (and that was enough). The butterfly is a montage from three shots. Once I had those both, I could take all my time to focus on the front of the flower (three more useful shots), even if the insects moved, the most difficult was won -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 07:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Nice work. Will support if you reduce highlights/overexposure on the butterfly. Wet season form? Good to specify for an FP. Charles (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good thinking with the stacking process and a very good result. --Cart (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support very good! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Solid. Daniel Case (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Colin (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:San Sebastian Donostia Panoramic 1190583.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2018 at 20:43:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  •   Info View of San Sebastian with Zurriola Beach and the mouth of the river Urumea. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ezarateesteban 00:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice dynamics, something interesting to see in every part of the frame. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Great shot and super detail. Charles (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:African buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer) male with cattle egret.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2018 at 09:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  •   Info As many of us know, our hair thins when we get older. There are several reasons why this buffalo has rolled in mud: for cooling; to acquire a sunscreen; and to keep parasites off his skin. Mud is his mineral-rich face pack - and when it dries it will fall off taking embedded ticks with it. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Charles (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Good light, good compo and an excellent -"Monday, this must be Monday..." photo. Getting rid of a few pixels up top for balance and cleaner background would make it even greater. See note. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Good idea. Charles (talk) 13:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Andoin - Cascadas de la Tobería -BT- 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 20:08:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Thank you, Daniel! The image is only a small part of a series of cascades and the incredible thing is that this waterfall is quite unknown even to the people living in the province here. And it's an absolute magic location! --Basotxerri (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Very true, and I have a couple of other favorites that I'll be waiting for. :) --Cart (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Malachite kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus cristatus) Namibia.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 16:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I'm afraid not. Size is around 13cm, so I'm actually about 6m away. Charles (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img100 Ertale.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 09:25:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   I don't think it is possible to get such a photo tack sharp. I got blurry heat haze on a summer's day, just imagine what this place must generate. --Cart (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Pirogue and tiny wooded island reflecting in the water.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2018 at 01:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 20:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 16:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) - view from Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 13:26:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:McClures Beach, Point Reyes National Seashore.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 11:30:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

those rocks are impassable, usually birds stay sleeping in the same positon or jump directly to fly --The Photographer 17:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose. To me the left crop is at an awkward place, and the large rock formation in the middle is too centered. -- King of ♠ 17:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 19:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but it looks oversharpened --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, it looks a little oversharpened but I'm forgiving that as a byproduct of the long exposure. Otherwise, I love it ... reminds me of a Roger Dean album cover, perhaps Drama, with rocks hitting the same angle as the ice on that one. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Sure, there's some randomness to the left and right crops, but I love what's there - the tall rocks with a pair of gulls on them and the profusion of mussels, in particularly -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Cinque dita 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2018 at 06:22:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •   Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A good but also a quite common mountain portrait. The mast on the right side is leaning in. --Milseburg (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
    •   Done The mast is vertical now --Llez (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
      • Yes, the tilt of the mast is gone but the problem is retouched badly. This becomes clearer while comparing the mountain station in the current version with the former one. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
        • You are right, there was a mistake in the correction. I uploaded a new version, please have again a look on it and compare with the previous (bad) correction --Llez (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support A bit soft but it looks like this was the best that could be done. Lovely colors and light. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Nicely composed and an interesting subject. Technically it's all you can get out of the 500D as far as I know from my own experience. --Code (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Striking, but the sky is a bit blotchy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Entzia - Paisaje -BT- 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2018 at 17:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain
  •   Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've chosen B&W for this because lack of interesting colours, the sun was already quite high and it was hazy. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice atmosphere. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 19:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Quite good, very nice undulating landscape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I understand the situation, but nonetheless: B&W for this kind of landscape doesn't work for me, sorry. --A.Savin 23:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • No problem, that's a matter of tastes. Thank you for your opinion! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Weak support It could be stronger if you lost that cloud from the upper left. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 11:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent!!, please try remode the upper left cloud --The Photographer 13:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Theatinerkirche Munich, March 2018.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2018 at 07:55:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Support Ahhh... clear skies. :) --Cart (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Great composition and mood, but could something be done about the oversharpening? Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks, Daniel. I honestly don't think the image is oversharpened, though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Onça do Pantanal.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 21:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I've got this lens and know how better it can be at 400mm, handheld with the stabilization. But the subject is interesting enough to strike my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support a great, possibly iconic shot that just shouldn't be overly pixelpeeped... honestly, I don't know what could have been done better. Equipment and exif look perfectly fine to me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I've seen jaguars in the Pantanal and they are not that colour. Charles (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I disagree the sharpness is an issue. The technical quality seems fine for a 400mm telephoto. At 6MP it looks completely sharp and would print A4 just fine. Charles, what specifically is wrong with the colour? Do you think the white balance is wrong? Surely the colour will change somewhat depending on ambient light. -- Colin (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Colour is too orange - check out the colour of the eyes - no other images on Google show this colour. Charles (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • If you take away the ambient soft yellow light and make the WB totally neutral (I did that in PS), you can see that there is something orange reflected in the jaguar's eyes. Orange is a preferred color to wear among some game keepers (and hunters) since many animals are color blind and they perceive it as grey while we humans can see each other even in dense foliage. This might be something like that reflecting. --Cart (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • No it's not a reflection. 400mm lens. It's a false colour. Charles (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support, along similar lines as Martin. This reminds me of an illustration from "Where the Wild Things Are", except that it's a real wild thing and a real photo. Also reminds me of paintings by Le Douanier Rousseau. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support This is a picture more than a photo (and those are rare here at FPC) so composition and wow overrules technical pixel-peep-perfection. The overall light in the pic is warm, creating an ambiance, so it's normal that the jaguar gets a hint of that tone too. --Cart (talk) 11:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per above. -- Colin (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --El Grafo (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart -- P999 (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart. Mood makes me think of the cover of Fleetwood Mac's Tango in the Night. It has imperfections, yes, but those imperfections are what gives it its impact. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Not perfect, yet close to it --A.Savin 23:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Granada (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO wow factor there is. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 07:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Vieux Crabe (ship, 1951), Sète.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 18:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Image:Vistas Alcazaba Almería.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2018 at 14:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Paisaje cerca de la mina de Collahuasi, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 16-21 PAN.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2018 at 18:41:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

@Poco a poco: Which makes this image all the more extraordinary ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Question - How many degrees is this panorama? It would be good to include that in the file description, too, I think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
    Ikan, it is aprox. 200 degrees (the road on left and right side is the same), I added it to the file description, along with the geodata (middle of nowhere) Poco2 07:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Straßburg Pöckstein 1 Schlosspark Monopteros 11102016 4827.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2018 at 13:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:HarryTruman.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2018 at 08:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 44th edit. --Cart (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose We have thousands of paintings, many more impressive than this one. Good, but not FP. Yann (talk) 04:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)