Commons:Kandidater till utvalda bilder

Det här är kandidater till att bli utvalda bilder.

För ett arkiv av tidigare nominerade se: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Det finns också en kronologisk lista av utvalda bilder.

NomineringEdit

Om du tror att du har funnit eller skapat en bild som kan anses värdefull, lägg till den här nedan i sektionen för nomineringar, högst upp i listan, med hjälp av den här länken (Hjälp). För det behöver du inte ha en inloggning, även anonyma användare får nominera.

Men innan du nominerar, kolla upp så att bilden har lämplig bildbeskrivning och licens.

OmröstningsreglerEdit

  • Röstningen pågår i 9 dagar. På den 10:e dagen blir resultatet fastställt.
  • Om en bild efter 5 dagar inte fått någon mer positiv röst än från den som nominerade, så kan kandidaten tas bort ifrån sidan.
  • Nomineringar ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare är välkomna
  • Bidrag ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare till diskussionen är välkomna
  • Röstning från oinloggade bidragsgivare räknas inte
  • En nominering räknas inte som en röst, men den som nominerar får rösta
  • Den som nominerar en bild kan när som helst ta bort bilden ifrån omröstningen

En kandidat kommer att bli en utvald bild om följande krav uppfylls:

  • Lämplig licens (så klart)
  • Minst 5 stödjande röster
  • Förhållande mellan stödjande/motsättande röster på minst 2/1 (minst två tredjedels majoritet)
  • Två olika versioner av samma bild kan inte båda bli utvalda; endast den med högst antal stödjande röster blir utvald.

Röstning kan göras med "{{Support}}" (stöd) eller "{{Oppose}}" (ej stöd), neutralitet kan anges med "{{Neutral}}".

KandidaterEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 21:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes

File:Rammu saare vaade.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 20:42:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kolga bay protected area

File:Rosa Borbonica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 18:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosa Borbonica

File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 13:30:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Farida Arriany, Indonesian actress

File:Plassy shipwreck 2016b.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 12:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plassy shipwreck on Inisheer island

File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 21:42:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kadavar Bandfoto 2016

File:Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 10:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dog-rose (Rosa canina)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Rosaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Dog-rose (Rosa canina). All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I would question the depth of field because while the center of the flower is beautifully in focus, none of the petals are, but you describe this accurately as a closeup. So take this for whatever it's worth, but I would suggest cropping almost all the leaves from the photo and having the picture frame be only big enough to encompass the flower well (probably in a square frame). If you do that, I would probably support featuring the picture because the part that is in focus is a great closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support more DOF under natural conditions is almost impossible for a small subject like this, focus bracketing is not possible. therefore I support this nomination. --Hubertl 01:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nicely done! Atsme 📞 03:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Love the DOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image is of excellent quality, but the light conditions seem somewhat harsh to me. So I feel no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Flamants roses sur le Lac de Tunis.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 09:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sight on lake of Tunis with flamingos
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I certainly understand that, but that explanation doesn't make the picture featurable in my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Ikan Kekek I got it my friend I will make my photos better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Absolutely! Keep trying. You are a good photographer, and voting against a feature shouldn't be interpreted as a statement that this photo is not good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 048.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 03:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Iceland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Diego takes so many great photos that he could sometimes use some help in getting more of them considered for a feature. I really like this view, the texture of the water and the way the light hits it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you for this nomination, Ikan! And thank you for asking for help. If somebody would like to look into potential FP candidates, you may find something here :) Poco2 14:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Those pages of potential FP candidates are amazing. Everyone would probably enjoy looking through them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 18:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice landscape. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition and beautiful landscape. But dull light.--Jebulon (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Two of Kongelige livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen Denmark.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kongelige Livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking "one", they are "two" ! Kongelige Livgarde at Amalienborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark.-- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain Due to personal involvement, but it did made me think of an FPC of yours nominated five years minus one day ago with another shadow. It appears this nomination starts out more succesfull. I am glad you have not given up on the shadows. Face-smile.svg -- Slaunger (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That's fun. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support one or two? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • At full size, I see two noses. Then, two. I guess.😜--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Good shot, windows above disturb, since shadow is important this could be croped as shown. Panorama suits this. --Mile (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for review and comment. I could maybe agree with the idea of crop below (less than suggested), but surely not above. The window does not disturb so much IMO. It does not disturb at all, because there is anothe window "sharing" the composition--Jebulon (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Interesting effect. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ~ Moheen (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Salagou Lake, Celles cf01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Salagou Lake, Hérault, France

File:2016-06-10 Blaues Wunder.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 12:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture shows the Loschwitz Bridge "The Blue Wonder" Dresden, Saxony, Germany.  The Blue Wonder is a so-called band-iron bridge. Here, the tensile forces are not transmitted by a cable or a chain, but of narrow metal strips which riveted together. These work like a rope. Since the concept has not prevailed, this bridge is an interesting historical and technical uniqueness.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by je-str - uploaded by je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Relatively straightforward good composition and informative description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 22:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question The field of view does not look huge, so I would be interested to know whether a rectillinear projection version would be possible. Personally, I think that would be preferable for architecture. --DXR (talk) 10:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Kann man machen, der Bildwinkel ist etwa 140 Grad. Aber die Unterschiede wären minimal, als dass sich das lohnen würde. Woran hast du eigentlich erkannt, dass es keine geradlinige Projektion ist? Je-str (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Puente Nuevo power plant in a reservoir in Cordoba, Spain
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good composition but very gray. Might look better as a black & white photo, as the lack of color would really bring out the excellent qualities of the variation of light and shadow and the overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I totally agree with you. I'm into artistic photography and I can tell you that this picture really works in B&W. But I didn't dare to turn it into B&W because I thought Commons users wouldn't be willing to miss colour information. --ElBute (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
      • We have featured other recently taken black & white photos before. You could create a black & white alternative and someone could put it up for a vote to see which version is more appreciated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

AlternativeEdit

Embalse de Puente Nuevo (alt1).jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info B&W version, as suggested by Ikan Kekek. --ElBute (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this version. INeverCry 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I prefer this version, too, and I will change my vote on the color photo to oppose if it becomes clear this alternative can get enough support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual B&W panorama. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Prefer this version. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parque Estadual Ilha do Mel.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 22:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan from James Atkinson's Sketches in Afghaunistan

File:Eastern Grey Squirrel.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 19:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Eastern Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Florida"

File:Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 14:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge

File:Schammelsdorf-war-memorial-6117014.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 13:09:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

War memorial in Schammelsdorf
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Reinhold Möller (Ermell) - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this photo moving, and in this case, I believe it actually helps the composition and makes it more poignant for the figures in the sculpture to be in shadow. Likewise, I don't think the lack of strong direct light is a drawback at all. I also find the overall composition harmonious and sufficiently sharp to satisfy me in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ali Zifan 17:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but there's too much going on and the light isn't really FP-worthy in my eyes. A good QI anyways. --Code (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - A disagreement about what good light for this subject consists of is a matter of taste, but if you would, please elaborate on what you mean by "too much going on". I enjoy moving my eyes around this composition. Do you feel that the hedges distract inordinately from the memorial? If so, that's just another disagreement as a matter of taste, as I consider the photo to be about the combination of vegetation and a memorial with village houses in the background, not just the memorial. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • It's mainly the wooden house on the right side of the background and the cut part of the roof at the left side. Together it makes the picture look unbalanced (the foreground is symmetrical while the background is not). The hedge itself is completely ok for me. I can imagine why you thought this could be FP but I'm sorry that I can't really agree. The light is too dull for my taste, maybe I'd give it a pro if the memorial was lit by the warm light of a rising sun or something like that. Of course, it's all a matter of taste. --Code (talk) 11:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Certainly. I appreciate the explanation and understand what made the difference for you and why. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Code. INeverCry 18:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Also per Code. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but no good motive. Especially the lamps placed on the commemorative tablets and the watering-can disturb. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination - Obviously, the chances of getting 8 supporting votes for this photo are vanishingly small. I still like the photo, but I understand the basis for not considering it to merit a feature. Thanks for your votes and remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Uitzicht over de Bekhofplas. Locatie, natuurterrein Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas 13.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 12:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over the Bekhofplas, Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas nature preserve, Netherlands

File:Las dos columnas de Hércules - Ábyla y Calpe, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 58-60 HDR.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 09:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain. The scultpure is a work of Ginés Serrán Pagán and dates from 2007. It's 7 metres (23 ft) and 4 tons heavy. All by me, Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support that's tilted! --Ralf Roleček 10:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ralf Roleček, that made me laugh! This is a very good photo of a very good sculpture. I did a little research and found out that it was created by Ginés Serrán Pagán, who was born in Ceuta in 1949 and now lives in New York. I think it would be a good idea to add at least the name of the sculptor to the description, and ideally, also his year of birth and the year of composition of this piece. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    Ikan: I had added some information in this nomination page but hadn't transferred it yet to the description page of the file. I did it now. Poco2 12:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A bit too dark overall for me. The sculpture doesn't stand out in this light. INeverCry 18:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is distracting and too little space at the bottom and sides (thin), and the statue seen too blue (WB). --The Photographer (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    @INeverCry, The Photographer:: I've just uploaded a new version with improvements in crop and curves, I also cloned out a cut off bush on the left. Please, let me know what you think Poco2 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I like the composition, but the lighting just doesn't allow the sculpture to stand out. INeverCry 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I actually think the dark blue of the sculpture by comparison with the bright sky helps it stand out, but I can understand your point of view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 08:46:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FCAB railway crossing the Carcote salt flat, southwestern Bolivia.

File:Bloemen en knoppen van Vingerhoedskruid (Digitalis purpurea). Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 04:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants # Plantaginaceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flowers and buds of Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). Location, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by User:Famberhorst - nominated by User:Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty flowers, enough of the plant is sharp enough for my taste, and I find this bokeh totally fine. Nice composition, too. In short, I do think this is solidly good enough for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The dull blueish lighting of the lower part spoils it for me. We’ve got better lit photographs of this species (though few of comparable quality, admittedly). --Kreuzschnabel 09:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Barn swallow (young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016 III.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 00:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn swallow(young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I may end up as the odd man out here, but I find that composition weird, because not only the bird but also the twig look like they're floating in mid-air, with no indication of solid ground anywhere in the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I might even prefer that one. I'm also used that barn swallows have somewhat different tones, but I'd assume it's the of case of some regional differences (Estonian vs Japanise birds) and not the issue with the tones of the image. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Peterborough Cathedral Nave, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 22:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peterborough Cathedral)

File:Nevuas.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Mattie Edwards Hewitt - half-length photo by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:26:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mattie Edwards Hewitt

File:Florence Earle Coates Platinum Print 3 - Restoration.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Florence Earle Coates
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown photographer - scanned by Londonjackbooks - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think you should restore the oval border too.--Jebulon (talk) 22:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I did, compared to the original, but this photograph was pasted atop the paper from what I can tell, and excessive restoration would conceal this. I try to leave in some signs of the way an image was made. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes. The photo was pasted into the front pages of a volume of poetry, as scanned. Londonjackbooks (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka, June 2016 IV.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 16:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitche (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not the best direction of the light, the plant is too lighted near overexposition, in any case too highlighted for the viewer, while the bottom of the insect body is too dark Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Definitely a good picture, but compared to some incredible Featured Pictures of insects I've seen before, this doesn't wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews :) --Laitche (talk) 02:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 177.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 07:35:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

view from the top of mountain Zaghoan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I like this picture and thought of nominating it myself. However, there's a smudge a bit to the right of the left margin that should be explained. I suspect it's just a darker part of a cloud, and if so, that's no problem and I would support a feature, but please address it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - @ -- Ikan Kekek thank you ! yes it is a darker part of the cloud : you can verify that at the ame level to the right there is a similar smudge but it is clearer that it is a part of the cloud .--IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks "too hot" (too white) due to sunlight for me. -- Pofka (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Pofka but my friend that how the shight looks like at noon in that period of the year the temperature was about 35 C° and we were at the top of the mountain. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @IssamBarhoumi: I know. But that is not a good timing for me. Never liked such "hot" pictures with blown colors. Maybe that's just my opinion and others will support you as they did so far. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @[[:User:-- Pofka|]]: Ok I got it my friend and i ll will make better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 3.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 21:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw. Reconstruction of the synagogue in Gwoździec (part)

File:Dolphin Anatomy.svgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 12:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dolphin Anatomy

File:Müstiline pärastlõuna.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Muraste Nature Reserve, Estonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Kristoffer Vaikla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Smaller than usual for a FP, but this is a beautiful photo. I'm not sure if others will be willing to overlook the small size. The rule I'm seeing is "Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information", and this picture easily clears that, but I seem to remember others referring to a figure of 6 MP for FP. But that's except for compelling reasons otherwise. To me, this is a special photo, and it's big enough to make its effect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose – really nice per IK but too noisy for me considering the small size, and chromatic aberration. --Kreuzschnabel 10:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I know that rules can be broken", but what about the rule of thirds, and the horizon in the middle. I feel it as a composition issue.--Jebulon (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - What horizon? Wherever the horizon might be, we can't see it because of the mist. I don't think that either the grass or trees constitute exactly 1/2 of the picture, but the reflexive opposition some folks here have to things that smack of divisions in two is very strange to me. The world is neither divided always in two nor in three. In order to get out of a rut, a photographer could just as well try a "rule of fifths" or a "rule of sevenths", but to cite an avant gardist in a different field, Arnold Schoenberg famously said “There is still much good music to be written in C major.” If the foremost champion of pantonality as the inevitable next stage in musical progress was that flexible, why use thirds as a crutch? I don't mean to suggest that you may not have good reasons for finding the composition wanting, but being divided in three or not being divided in two don't strike me as a good absolute rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. As Jebulon points out, the composition is an issue here. It looks like we're missing a necessary part of the image at top. INeverCry 18:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Not to me. This is the image the photographer desired. Someone else, if they were standing in the same place with a camera at the same time, might have taken a picture that included the further-up reaches of the trees, but why is that necessary? I think the point of this photo is to show the rays of sunlight shining through the mist between the trees and hitting the grass and the sides of some trees, and that's what it shows. Why would the addition of anything else improve the composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • For me, I like the trees, but I feel the photograph would be better and more balanced if more of the trees could be seen, and the grass took up the bottom third of the composition. This has an incomplete look to it for me. INeverCry 18:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Somehow, expressed this way, I can relate to your view more, though I still don't share it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, this is somewhat unusual composition, but I think it works well with the current image. For me this even increases the wow factor as it makes the image more especial. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2009.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meenikunno Nature Park, Estonia
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - If the picture is awesome, who cares about such "rules", which are really more general guidelines than actual rules? This is the 21st century. We experienced over 100 years of avant gardism, and now all of a sudden, we're supposed to have inflexible rules of composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • The rule of third is one possible, but not the only one. With a symmetric or near symmetric composition, a centered horizon makes sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I wonder how this would look with more sky? As it is though, it's a pretty striking blend of color and reflection. INeverCry 18:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great Estonia! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 11:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and +1 to Yann's comment. --El Grafo (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 01:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meiosis Stages.svgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 21:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@ Ikan Kekek I hoped you compare it to other images in its scope (Computer-generated/Biology). Even though it is small, it can be resized without reducing the image quality since it is a SVG. It also passed under the W3C validator without any errors. A complex illustration is quite a bit more work than a click on a camera :) Ali Zifan 03:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I don't devalue the work that went into this; I just don't find it beautiful and therefore don't believe it should be a Featured Picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Has a high EV and very well done. It is a pity that there are little FPs about this, and also, it is a SVG, meaning, you can enlarge it without reducing quality even to 10000000000000000000000000... px! -- Poké95 10:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Please don't forget the tips that I gave you --The Photographer (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done. We need more of this kind :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality image with great content--Freshman404Talk 09:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:3 CATs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 11:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Construction of Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort, Sochi.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I give this picture credit for being an unusual composition, but the image doesn't wow me and the background is too fuzzy for my taste. Interesting idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 17:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Pity, the idea is really good. But even the caterpillars are not sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 18:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Btw, compo would be much better with the caterpillars more to the right, looking towards center --Kreuzschnabel 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 11:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting composition. I can not say that the caterpillars are not sharp. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It seems as if the machines are paying homage to the wilderness ... I like the way the points of the bucket arms echo the mountain summits above. Yes, the peaks are hazed in ... but for once they're not the subject of the image, are they? Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Brandslange.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 21:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like a Wilfredo's social work. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing, really it's art and hight EV, wow. Look like a picture mine --The Photographer (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's a good composition, but could it be sharpened a bit? I think that compositions like this, in order to wow, probably need to be sharper, although I do note that 3 people disagree with me so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm going to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this. It's a nice picture but doesn't wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a special enough idea to make up for the low quality. Noisy towards the top, generally unsharp. --Kreuzschnabel 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • The "noise" at the top is soot from diesel buses and the soot is also on the white-painted bricks, the image is from a bus garage in Aarhus, Denmark. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some still life, not bad. You should put that lamp ON. --Mile (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, I feel 1960's mood :) --Laitche (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. IMO the location should be added to filename and description. --XRay talk 05:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Picture of the year (British Journal of Photography style) ;-). No honestly, refreshingly different! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice forms. I like the way the clean lines and grid play off the grittiness of the setting. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Château de Caumont - Château Renaissance - 21 - 2016-05-14.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 13:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caumont castle and its park

File:Purpuricène.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 10:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Mild/moderate Symbol support vote.svg Support - The beetle is pretty clear to me, and I like how its surface shines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Scintillating (literally, per Ikan). Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Carlo Tessarini.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 09:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William Pether - uploaded and nominated by Rettinghaus -- Rettinghaus (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rettinghaus (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I don't understand the justification for brightening this image (compared to the original). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support I would've got rid of the uneven borders and probably quietly removed that wart or whatever it is on his forehead, but otherwise this is pleasant to look at. I'm not big on historical fidelity. I prefer things to look nice and clean. Face-wink.svg INeverCry 05:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ali Zifan 02:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is a pity. The portrait needs a serious restoration, and the engraving is not outstanding to me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Dianthus carthusianorum Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 05:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum)
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Order_:_Caryophyllales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum). All by -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Respectfully Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice flower, but at full size, it's glary and not as sharp as some FP flowers have been. Of course, to even zoom in that much on any basis is impressive, but as interesting as the results are, I don't think they make this one of the very best photos on the site. I expect that others will disagree, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Compared with other flowers, this one is also more challenging, because it is so small: its diameter is just about 20mm. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Fair point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice abstraction. Sharp enough for me, considering the DOF being worked with here; I don't think I could have done better. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. While it’s really good and certainly QI/VI it lacks a bit wow to be featured, and the softness doesn’t help. --Kreuzschnabel 14:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ali Zifan 02:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 04:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Isn't the image oversaturated? Kruusamägi (talk) 20:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I guess it's all just a matter of taste. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 23:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by LivioAndronico (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It surely looks good but the golden framing shows some glare, and the entire image lacks wow to me. Being technically good does not make an FP for me, it want to see a special idea in it. Of course Livio can place his tripod under hundreds of ceilings in Rome and take technically good pics of them but I really don’t think we have to feature them all. --Kreuzschnabel 14:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The gold parts look too denoised for me. Lack of relief, seems too "soft".--Jebulon (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Spurzem (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Aegina sunset.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 21:15:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aegina sunset
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Evening light at Aegina harbour, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I think this is a deserving candidate. One thing that really helps the form is the change in the texture of the water in the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 22:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The cut-off boats make this composition feel far too busy and unbalanced for me. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I think it is impossible to show a harbour without cutting off some boats, alas...--Jebulon (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree with you; unfortunately some scenes just won't make beautiful compositions -- Thennicke (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, let's disagree about what a "beautiful composition" is ! Please just notice that I took care not to crop the buoy at left Clin !--Jebulon (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 10:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI for sure but I do not feel wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meister der Manessischen Liederhandschrift 004.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 09:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Otto IV of Brandenburg playing chess with a woman, 1305 to 1340
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because its pixel size is way below minimum --Kreuzschnabel 17:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Parnassius mnemosyne - Dumanlı apollo 12.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 20:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parnassius mnemosyne


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Radmor 5102 01.jpg, not featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 16:13:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Look like CB station. Put wider crop, its thinny now. --Mile (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support More objects. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not completely sharp (I think photos of objects like this should be completely, or almost completely sharp), and the black background lacks contrast. For my taste, I would suggest for you to photograph this again with a contrasting background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. A studio shot like this must be entirely crisp sharp. The device could have been cleaned before, too. --Kreuzschnabel 11:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. A good shot, but not outstanding → missing wow factor. --El Grafo (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. And the white letters looks overexposed to me.--Jebulon (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg, not featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 15:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Trees.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Group of trees in overgrown habitat. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, unsharp, and numerous mosaicing errors (parts of grass blades being all green or purple). Certainly it’s a nice atmosphere but that alone does not make it featurable for me. --Kreuzschnabel 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not seeing the mosaicing errors Kreuzschnabel sees (I actually don't know what "mosaicing" is), and none of the unsharpness bothers me, as what I'm seeing is in no way excessive and caused by haze and motion blur. But the overall composition is great, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think I need another year’s holiday of FPC. I start to see things others cannot see. Btw, mosaicing is one of the basic concepts of digital photography. Have fun. --Kreuzschnabel 21:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I Googled the term. Seems to be another (more formal?) name for stitching. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - By the way, it's totally fine for you to take a vacation from here if you like, but I hope it's not too long because I appreciate the views you express here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentSee en:Demosaicing. I put an annotation on the nomination site, there’s a clearly visible green-and-purple pattern in the grass caused by interference of these details and the sensor matrix. Won’t look nice when printed. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Kreuzschnabel: You're not seeing ghosts, it's there. But you have to look for it at 100% zoom, so that alone probably wouldn't be enough for an oppose for me. However, I'm not really wowed by it either, tending towards a Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose --El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I applied a color luminance correction. I think, it´s ok now. (you can make it either with the camera raw filter from Photoshop or with Lightroom, I did it with Photoshop. But I think it may be same procedure and algorithm. --Hubertl 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Jep, looks much better now. Struck my oppose above, moving to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
@Hubertl, Hubertl:. Thank you for your correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Sugarloaf Sunrise 2.jpgEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 16:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in Rio de Janeiro with Sugarloaf Mountain, seen from Tijuca Park.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've also marked a lens flare on the image which should be cleaned up -- Thennicke (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

AlternativeEdit

Sugarloaf Sunrise 2 ks01.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I actually think I prefer the smaller sun and greater amount of dark ground in the other version. It feels more balanced between light and dark to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll take either one. Face-wink.svg INeverCry 01:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC))

File:Cappadocia Chimneys - DWiW.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 19:53:45
"Fairy Chimneys rock formation, nearby Gorëme, in Cappadocia, central Turkey"

Cappadocia Chimneys Wikimedia Commons.jpg
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Pine 19:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Wolf im Wald 12:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace INeverCry 19:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace because I think it's an improvement over DWIW's work (which was pretty good and inspired mine, but I had the advantage to start from RAW). - Benh (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace The concern I raised in my oppose during the original nomination has been sufficiently addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Milseburg (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace And 10. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC))


Ta bort utvald-status ifrån bilderEdit

Efterhand kan standarden för utvalda bilder ändras. Bilder som tidigare var tillräckligt bra, kanske inte längre anses vara det. Här listas bilder som du tycker inte längre förtjänar att vara utvalda bilder. Då behövs 2/3 majoritet (och minst 5 röster) som håller med om att ta bort utvald-statusen ifrån bilden. Om inte 2/3 av de röstande håller med om att ta bort den, så är bilden fortsatt utvald. Här röstar man med {{Keep}} (bilden förtjänar att kvarstå som utvald) or {{Delist}} (bilden förtjänar inte att kvarstå som utvald). När du nominerar en bild här, ta med länken till den ursprungliga utvald-bild-nomineringen (den finns under Länkar på bildens beskrivningssida. Använd den här länken för att lägga till en borttags-kandidat.

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 21:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes

File:Rammu saare vaade.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 20:42:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kolga bay protected area

File:Rosa Borbonica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 18:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosa Borbonica

File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 13:30:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Farida Arriany, Indonesian actress

File:Plassy shipwreck 2016b.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 12:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plassy shipwreck on Inisheer island

File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 21:42:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kadavar Bandfoto 2016

File:Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 10:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dog-rose (Rosa canina)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Rosaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Dog-rose (Rosa canina). All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I would question the depth of field because while the center of the flower is beautifully in focus, none of the petals are, but you describe this accurately as a closeup. So take this for whatever it's worth, but I would suggest cropping almost all the leaves from the photo and having the picture frame be only big enough to encompass the flower well (probably in a square frame). If you do that, I would probably support featuring the picture because the part that is in focus is a great closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support more DOF under natural conditions is almost impossible for a small subject like this, focus bracketing is not possible. therefore I support this nomination. --Hubertl 01:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nicely done! Atsme 📞 03:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Love the DOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image is of excellent quality, but the light conditions seem somewhat harsh to me. So I feel no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Flamants roses sur le Lac de Tunis.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 09:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sight on lake of Tunis with flamingos
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I certainly understand that, but that explanation doesn't make the picture featurable in my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Ikan Kekek I got it my friend I will make my photos better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Absolutely! Keep trying. You are a good photographer, and voting against a feature shouldn't be interpreted as a statement that this photo is not good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 048.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 03:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Iceland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Diego takes so many great photos that he could sometimes use some help in getting more of them considered for a feature. I really like this view, the texture of the water and the way the light hits it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you for this nomination, Ikan! And thank you for asking for help. If somebody would like to look into potential FP candidates, you may find something here :) Poco2 14:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Those pages of potential FP candidates are amazing. Everyone would probably enjoy looking through them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 18:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice landscape. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition and beautiful landscape. But dull light.--Jebulon (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Two of Kongelige livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen Denmark.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kongelige Livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking "one", they are "two" ! Kongelige Livgarde at Amalienborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark.-- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain Due to personal involvement, but it did made me think of an FPC of yours nominated five years minus one day ago with another shadow. It appears this nomination starts out more succesfull. I am glad you have not given up on the shadows. Face-smile.svg -- Slaunger (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That's fun. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support one or two? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • At full size, I see two noses. Then, two. I guess.😜--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Good shot, windows above disturb, since shadow is important this could be croped as shown. Panorama suits this. --Mile (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for review and comment. I could maybe agree with the idea of crop below (less than suggested), but surely not above. The window does not disturb so much IMO. It does not disturb at all, because there is anothe window "sharing" the composition--Jebulon (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Interesting effect. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ~ Moheen (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Salagou Lake, Celles cf01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Salagou Lake, Hérault, France

File:2016-06-10 Blaues Wunder.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 12:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture shows the Loschwitz Bridge "The Blue Wonder" Dresden, Saxony, Germany.  The Blue Wonder is a so-called band-iron bridge. Here, the tensile forces are not transmitted by a cable or a chain, but of narrow metal strips which riveted together. These work like a rope. Since the concept has not prevailed, this bridge is an interesting historical and technical uniqueness.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by je-str - uploaded by je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Relatively straightforward good composition and informative description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 22:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question The field of view does not look huge, so I would be interested to know whether a rectillinear projection version would be possible. Personally, I think that would be preferable for architecture. --DXR (talk) 10:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Kann man machen, der Bildwinkel ist etwa 140 Grad. Aber die Unterschiede wären minimal, als dass sich das lohnen würde. Woran hast du eigentlich erkannt, dass es keine geradlinige Projektion ist? Je-str (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Puente Nuevo power plant in a reservoir in Cordoba, Spain
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good composition but very gray. Might look better as a black & white photo, as the lack of color would really bring out the excellent qualities of the variation of light and shadow and the overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I totally agree with you. I'm into artistic photography and I can tell you that this picture really works in B&W. But I didn't dare to turn it into B&W because I thought Commons users wouldn't be willing to miss colour information. --ElBute (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
      • We have featured other recently taken black & white photos before. You could create a black & white alternative and someone could put it up for a vote to see which version is more appreciated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

AlternativeEdit

Embalse de Puente Nuevo (alt1).jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info B&W version, as suggested by Ikan Kekek. --ElBute (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this version. INeverCry 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I prefer this version, too, and I will change my vote on the color photo to oppose if it becomes clear this alternative can get enough support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual B&W panorama. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Prefer this version. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parque Estadual Ilha do Mel.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 22:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan from James Atkinson's Sketches in Afghaunistan

File:Eastern Grey Squirrel.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 19:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Eastern Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Florida"

File:Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 14:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge

File:Schammelsdorf-war-memorial-6117014.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 13:09:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

War memorial in Schammelsdorf
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Reinhold Möller (Ermell) - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this photo moving, and in this case, I believe it actually helps the composition and makes it more poignant for the figures in the sculpture to be in shadow. Likewise, I don't think the lack of strong direct light is a drawback at all. I also find the overall composition harmonious and sufficiently sharp to satisfy me in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ali Zifan 17:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but there's too much going on and the light isn't really FP-worthy in my eyes. A good QI anyways. --Code (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - A disagreement about what good light for this subject consists of is a matter of taste, but if you would, please elaborate on what you mean by "too much going on". I enjoy moving my eyes around this composition. Do you feel that the hedges distract inordinately from the memorial? If so, that's just another disagreement as a matter of taste, as I consider the photo to be about the combination of vegetation and a memorial with village houses in the background, not just the memorial. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • It's mainly the wooden house on the right side of the background and the cut part of the roof at the left side. Together it makes the picture look unbalanced (the foreground is symmetrical while the background is not). The hedge itself is completely ok for me. I can imagine why you thought this could be FP but I'm sorry that I can't really agree. The light is too dull for my taste, maybe I'd give it a pro if the memorial was lit by the warm light of a rising sun or something like that. Of course, it's all a matter of taste. --Code (talk) 11:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Certainly. I appreciate the explanation and understand what made the difference for you and why. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Code. INeverCry 18:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Also per Code. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but no good motive. Especially the lamps placed on the commemorative tablets and the watering-can disturb. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination - Obviously, the chances of getting 8 supporting votes for this photo are vanishingly small. I still like the photo, but I understand the basis for not considering it to merit a feature. Thanks for your votes and remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Uitzicht over de Bekhofplas. Locatie, natuurterrein Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas 13.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 12:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over the Bekhofplas, Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas nature preserve, Netherlands

File:Las dos columnas de Hércules - Ábyla y Calpe, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 58-60 HDR.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 09:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain. The scultpure is a work of Ginés Serrán Pagán and dates from 2007. It's 7 metres (23 ft) and 4 tons heavy. All by me, Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support that's tilted! --Ralf Roleček 10:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ralf Roleček, that made me laugh! This is a very good photo of a very good sculpture. I did a little research and found out that it was created by Ginés Serrán Pagán, who was born in Ceuta in 1949 and now lives in New York. I think it would be a good idea to add at least the name of the sculptor to the description, and ideally, also his year of birth and the year of composition of this piece. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    Ikan: I had added some information in this nomination page but hadn't transferred it yet to the description page of the file. I did it now. Poco2 12:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A bit too dark overall for me. The sculpture doesn't stand out in this light. INeverCry 18:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is distracting and too little space at the bottom and sides (thin), and the statue seen too blue (WB). --The Photographer (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    @INeverCry, The Photographer:: I've just uploaded a new version with improvements in crop and curves, I also cloned out a cut off bush on the left. Please, let me know what you think Poco2 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I like the composition, but the lighting just doesn't allow the sculpture to stand out. INeverCry 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I actually think the dark blue of the sculpture by comparison with the bright sky helps it stand out, but I can understand your point of view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 08:46:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FCAB railway crossing the Carcote salt flat, southwestern Bolivia.

File:Bloemen en knoppen van Vingerhoedskruid (Digitalis purpurea). Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 04:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants # Plantaginaceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flowers and buds of Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). Location, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by User:Famberhorst - nominated by User:Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty flowers, enough of the plant is sharp enough for my taste, and I find this bokeh totally fine. Nice composition, too. In short, I do think this is solidly good enough for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The dull blueish lighting of the lower part spoils it for me. We’ve got better lit photographs of this species (though few of comparable quality, admittedly). --Kreuzschnabel 09:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Barn swallow (young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016 III.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 00:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn swallow(young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I may end up as the odd man out here, but I find that composition weird, because not only the bird but also the twig look like they're floating in mid-air, with no indication of solid ground anywhere in the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I might even prefer that one. I'm also used that barn swallows have somewhat different tones, but I'd assume it's the of case of some regional differences (Estonian vs Japanise birds) and not the issue with the tones of the image. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Peterborough Cathedral Nave, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 22:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peterborough Cathedral)

File:Nevuas.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Mattie Edwards Hewitt - half-length photo by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:26:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mattie Edwards Hewitt

File:Florence Earle Coates Platinum Print 3 - Restoration.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Florence Earle Coates
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown photographer - scanned by Londonjackbooks - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think you should restore the oval border too.--Jebulon (talk) 22:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I did, compared to the original, but this photograph was pasted atop the paper from what I can tell, and excessive restoration would conceal this. I try to leave in some signs of the way an image was made. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes. The photo was pasted into the front pages of a volume of poetry, as scanned. Londonjackbooks (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka, June 2016 IV.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 16:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitche (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not the best direction of the light, the plant is too lighted near overexposition, in any case too highlighted for the viewer, while the bottom of the insect body is too dark Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Definitely a good picture, but compared to some incredible Featured Pictures of insects I've seen before, this doesn't wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews :) --Laitche (talk) 02:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 177.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 07:35:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

view from the top of mountain Zaghoan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I like this picture and thought of nominating it myself. However, there's a smudge a bit to the right of the left margin that should be explained. I suspect it's just a darker part of a cloud, and if so, that's no problem and I would support a feature, but please address it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - @ -- Ikan Kekek thank you ! yes it is a darker part of the cloud : you can verify that at the ame level to the right there is a similar smudge but it is clearer that it is a part of the cloud .--IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks "too hot" (too white) due to sunlight for me. -- Pofka (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Pofka but my friend that how the shight looks like at noon in that period of the year the temperature was about 35 C° and we were at the top of the mountain. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @IssamBarhoumi: I know. But that is not a good timing for me. Never liked such "hot" pictures with blown colors. Maybe that's just my opinion and others will support you as they did so far. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @[[:User:-- Pofka|]]: Ok I got it my friend and i ll will make better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 3.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 21:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw. Reconstruction of the synagogue in Gwoździec (part)

File:Dolphin Anatomy.svgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 12:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dolphin Anatomy

File:Müstiline pärastlõuna.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Muraste Nature Reserve, Estonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Kristoffer Vaikla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Smaller than usual for a FP, but this is a beautiful photo. I'm not sure if others will be willing to overlook the small size. The rule I'm seeing is "Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information", and this picture easily clears that, but I seem to remember others referring to a figure of 6 MP for FP. But that's except for compelling reasons otherwise. To me, this is a special photo, and it's big enough to make its effect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose – really nice per IK but too noisy for me considering the small size, and chromatic aberration. --Kreuzschnabel 10:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I know that rules can be broken", but what about the rule of thirds, and the horizon in the middle. I feel it as a composition issue.--Jebulon (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - What horizon? Wherever the horizon might be, we can't see it because of the mist. I don't think that either the grass or trees constitute exactly 1/2 of the picture, but the reflexive opposition some folks here have to things that smack of divisions in two is very strange to me. The world is neither divided always in two nor in three. In order to get out of a rut, a photographer could just as well try a "rule of fifths" or a "rule of sevenths", but to cite an avant gardist in a different field, Arnold Schoenberg famously said “There is still much good music to be written in C major.” If the foremost champion of pantonality as the inevitable next stage in musical progress was that flexible, why use thirds as a crutch? I don't mean to suggest that you may not have good reasons for finding the composition wanting, but being divided in three or not being divided in two don't strike me as a good absolute rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. As Jebulon points out, the composition is an issue here. It looks like we're missing a necessary part of the image at top. INeverCry 18:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Not to me. This is the image the photographer desired. Someone else, if they were standing in the same place with a camera at the same time, might have taken a picture that included the further-up reaches of the trees, but why is that necessary? I think the point of this photo is to show the rays of sunlight shining through the mist between the trees and hitting the grass and the sides of some trees, and that's what it shows. Why would the addition of anything else improve the composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • For me, I like the trees, but I feel the photograph would be better and more balanced if more of the trees could be seen, and the grass took up the bottom third of the composition. This has an incomplete look to it for me. INeverCry 18:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Somehow, expressed this way, I can relate to your view more, though I still don't share it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, this is somewhat unusual composition, but I think it works well with the current image. For me this even increases the wow factor as it makes the image more especial. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2009.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meenikunno Nature Park, Estonia
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - If the picture is awesome, who cares about such "rules", which are really more general guidelines than actual rules? This is the 21st century. We experienced over 100 years of avant gardism, and now all of a sudden, we're supposed to have inflexible rules of composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • The rule of third is one possible, but not the only one. With a symmetric or near symmetric composition, a centered horizon makes sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I wonder how this would look with more sky? As it is though, it's a pretty striking blend of color and reflection. INeverCry 18:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great Estonia! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 11:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and +1 to Yann's comment. --El Grafo (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 01:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meiosis Stages.svgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 21:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@ Ikan Kekek I hoped you compare it to other images in its scope (Computer-generated/Biology). Even though it is small, it can be resized without reducing the image quality since it is a SVG. It also passed under the W3C validator without any errors. A complex illustration is quite a bit more work than a click on a camera :) Ali Zifan 03:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I don't devalue the work that went into this; I just don't find it beautiful and therefore don't believe it should be a Featured Picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Has a high EV and very well done. It is a pity that there are little FPs about this, and also, it is a SVG, meaning, you can enlarge it without reducing quality even to 10000000000000000000000000... px! -- Poké95 10:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Please don't forget the tips that I gave you --The Photographer (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done. We need more of this kind :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality image with great content--Freshman404Talk 09:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:3 CATs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 11:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Construction of Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort, Sochi.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I give this picture credit for being an unusual composition, but the image doesn't wow me and the background is too fuzzy for my taste. Interesting idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 17:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Pity, the idea is really good. But even the caterpillars are not sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 18:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Btw, compo would be much better with the caterpillars more to the right, looking towards center --Kreuzschnabel 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 11:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting composition. I can not say that the caterpillars are not sharp. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It seems as if the machines are paying homage to the wilderness ... I like the way the points of the bucket arms echo the mountain summits above. Yes, the peaks are hazed in ... but for once they're not the subject of the image, are they? Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Brandslange.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 21:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like a Wilfredo's social work. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing, really it's art and hight EV, wow. Look like a picture mine --The Photographer (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's a good composition, but could it be sharpened a bit? I think that compositions like this, in order to wow, probably need to be sharper, although I do note that 3 people disagree with me so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm going to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this. It's a nice picture but doesn't wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a special enough idea to make up for the low quality. Noisy towards the top, generally unsharp. --Kreuzschnabel 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • The "noise" at the top is soot from diesel buses and the soot is also on the white-painted bricks, the image is from a bus garage in Aarhus, Denmark. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some still life, not bad. You should put that lamp ON. --Mile (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, I feel 1960's mood :) --Laitche (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. IMO the location should be added to filename and description. --XRay talk 05:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Picture of the year (British Journal of Photography style) ;-). No honestly, refreshingly different! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice forms. I like the way the clean lines and grid play off the grittiness of the setting. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Château de Caumont - Château Renaissance - 21 - 2016-05-14.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 13:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caumont castle and its park

File:Purpuricène.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 10:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Mild/moderate Symbol support vote.svg Support - The beetle is pretty clear to me, and I like how its surface shines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Scintillating (literally, per Ikan). Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Carlo Tessarini.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 09:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William Pether - uploaded and nominated by Rettinghaus -- Rettinghaus (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rettinghaus (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I don't understand the justification for brightening this image (compared to the original). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support I would've got rid of the uneven borders and probably quietly removed that wart or whatever it is on his forehead, but otherwise this is pleasant to look at. I'm not big on historical fidelity. I prefer things to look nice and clean. Face-wink.svg INeverCry 05:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ali Zifan 02:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is a pity. The portrait needs a serious restoration, and the engraving is not outstanding to me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Dianthus carthusianorum Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 05:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum)
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Order_:_Caryophyllales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum). All by -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Respectfully Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice flower, but at full size, it's glary and not as sharp as some FP flowers have been. Of course, to even zoom in that much on any basis is impressive, but as interesting as the results are, I don't think they make this one of the very best photos on the site. I expect that others will disagree, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Compared with other flowers, this one is also more challenging, because it is so small: its diameter is just about 20mm. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Fair point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice abstraction. Sharp enough for me, considering the DOF being worked with here; I don't think I could have done better. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. While it’s really good and certainly QI/VI it lacks a bit wow to be featured, and the softness doesn’t help. --Kreuzschnabel 14:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ali Zifan 02:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 04:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Isn't the image oversaturated? Kruusamägi (talk) 20:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I guess it's all just a matter of taste. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 23:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by LivioAndronico (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It surely looks good but the golden framing shows some glare, and the entire image lacks wow to me. Being technically good does not make an FP for me, it want to see a special idea in it. Of course Livio can place his tripod under hundreds of ceilings in Rome and take technically good pics of them but I really don’t think we have to feature them all. --Kreuzschnabel 14:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The gold parts look too denoised for me. Lack of relief, seems too "soft".--Jebulon (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Spurzem (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Aegina sunset.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 21:15:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aegina sunset
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Evening light at Aegina harbour, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I think this is a deserving candidate. One thing that really helps the form is the change in the texture of the water in the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 22:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The cut-off boats make this composition feel far too busy and unbalanced for me. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I think it is impossible to show a harbour without cutting off some boats, alas...--Jebulon (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree with you; unfortunately some scenes just won't make beautiful compositions -- Thennicke (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, let's disagree about what a "beautiful composition" is ! Please just notice that I took care not to crop the buoy at left Clin !--Jebulon (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 10:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI for sure but I do not feel wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Meister der Manessischen Liederhandschrift 004.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 09:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Otto IV of Brandenburg playing chess with a woman, 1305 to 1340
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because its pixel size is way below minimum --Kreuzschnabel 17:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Parnassius mnemosyne - Dumanlı apollo 12.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 20:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parnassius mnemosyne


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Radmor 5102 01.jpg, not featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 16:13:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Look like CB station. Put wider crop, its thinny now. --Mile (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support More objects. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not completely sharp (I think photos of objects like this should be completely, or almost completely sharp), and the black background lacks contrast. For my taste, I would suggest for you to photograph this again with a contrasting background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. A studio shot like this must be entirely crisp sharp. The device could have been cleaned before, too. --Kreuzschnabel 11:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. A good shot, but not outstanding → missing wow factor. --El Grafo (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. And the white letters looks overexposed to me.--Jebulon (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg, not featuredEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 15:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Trees.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Group of trees in overgrown habitat. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, unsharp, and numerous mosaicing errors (parts of grass blades being all green or purple). Certainly it’s a nice atmosphere but that alone does not make it featurable for me. --Kreuzschnabel 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not seeing the mosaicing errors Kreuzschnabel sees (I actually don't know what "mosaicing" is), and none of the unsharpness bothers me, as what I'm seeing is in no way excessive and caused by haze and motion blur. But the overall composition is great, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 19:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think I need another year’s holiday of FPC. I start to see things others cannot see. Btw, mosaicing is one of the basic concepts of digital photography. Have fun. --Kreuzschnabel 21:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I Googled the term. Seems to be another (more formal?) name for stitching. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - By the way, it's totally fine for you to take a vacation from here if you like, but I hope it's not too long because I appreciate the views you express here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentSee en:Demosaicing. I put an annotation on the nomination site, there’s a clearly visible green-and-purple pattern in the grass caused by interference of these details and the sensor matrix. Won’t look nice when printed. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Kreuzschnabel: You're not seeing ghosts, it's there. But you have to look for it at 100% zoom, so that alone probably wouldn't be enough for an oppose for me. However, I'm not really wowed by it either, tending towards a Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose --El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I applied a color luminance correction. I think, it´s ok now. (you can make it either with the camera raw filter from Photoshop or with Lightroom, I did it with Photoshop. But I think it may be same procedure and algorithm. --Hubertl 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Jep, looks much better now. Struck my oppose above, moving to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
@Hubertl, Hubertl:. Thank you for your correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Sugarloaf Sunrise 2.jpgEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 16:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in Rio de Janeiro with Sugarloaf Mountain, seen from Tijuca Park.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've also marked a lens flare on the image which should be cleaned up -- Thennicke (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

AlternativeEdit

Sugarloaf Sunrise 2 ks01.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I actually think I prefer the smaller sun and greater amount of dark ground in the other version. It feels more balanced between light and dark to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll take either one. Face-wink.svg INeverCry 01:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC))

File:Cappadocia Chimneys - DWiW.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 19:53:45
"Fairy Chimneys rock formation, nearby Gorëme, in Cappadocia, central Turkey"

Cappadocia Chimneys Wikimedia Commons.jpg
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Pine 19:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Wolf im Wald 12:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace INeverCry 19:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace because I think it's an improvement over DWIW's work (which was pretty good and inspired mine, but I had the advantage to start from RAW). - Benh (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace The concern I raised in my oppose during the original nomination has been sufficiently addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Milseburg (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace And 10. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC))
Read in another language