Open main menu

Commons:Kandydatury do wartościowych grafik

This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Przejdź do nominacji obrazu Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

Crystal Clear mimetype txt2.png Trwa tłumaczenie tej strony z jej angielskiej wersji .

Valued image seal.svg

Tu znajdują się kandydatury do miana wartościowej grafiki. Należy pamiętać, że wartościowa grafika to nie to samo co grafika na medal czy grafika wysokiej jakości. Jeśli potrzebujesz więcej informacji, uzyskasz je na stronie krytyka ~ocena~ grafiki.

Pojedyncza grafika zgłaszana jest do statusu wartościowa grafika (WG) , natomiast seria grafik do statusu zestaw wartościowej grafiki (ZWG) . Kandydatura musi być zgłoszona jako najcenniejsza grafika w określonej kategorii spośród wszystkich w Commons' . Oceny należy dokonać zgodnie z valued image criteria ~kryteriami wartościowej grafiki~.

Procedura rewizji wartościowej grafiki (RWG) zostaje otwarta w sytuacji, gdy dwie lub więcej grafik konkuruje o miano WG lub ZWG w tej samej kategorii.

Zasady zgłaszania kandydatur można znależć na stronie Commons:Valued image candidates/Zasady zgłaszania.

Niezakwalifikowana ~odrzucona/nieprzyjęta~ grafika może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w tej samej kategorii, gdy wszystkie wobec niej zastrzeżenia zostaną skorygowane. Grafika, która została sklasyfikowana jako "undecided" może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w każdej chwili. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
36,496 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
32,620 (89.4%) 
Undecided
  
1,804 (4.9%) 
Declined
  
2,072 (5.7%) 



New valued image nominationsEdit

   
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2019-10-12 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Locks of Fonsérannes (Canal du Midi) looking downstream
Used in:
Reason:
This flight of locks, which entered service in 1697, are a French National Monument -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2019-10-14 06:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Capra pyrenaica pyrenaica (Pyrenean ibex) female, taxidermied specimen

  Comment A female probably --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-15 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Acosmeryx formosana mounted specimen male ventral

  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-15 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre (Gaillac, Tarn) - interior

  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-15 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Insegna dell'arte dei Coroneri by Francesco Guardi - Ca' Rezzonico Venice

  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2019-10-15 05:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Ondina modiola, shell
  •   Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2019-10-15 06:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Lynx lynx (Eurasian lynx) skulls
  • @Ercé: I've adjusted the scope a bit to align it with the rules, hope that's OK with you? --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @El Grafo:OK for me ! Thanks --Ercé (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2019-10-15 11:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Christuskirche (Bayreuth), southern front
Used in:
  •   Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2019-10-15 17:31 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Wanderer W240, rear and left side
    Used in:
    de: Wanderer W22
    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-16 05:05 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Smerinthus planus mounted specimen male dorsal
    •   Support Useful and best in scope --GRDN711 (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
    Open for review.

    }}

     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-16 05:07 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Microscope « Nachet et Fils Paris » Model 1854
    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-16 05:09 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ca' Razzonico - La danza dei satiri - Giandomenico Tiepolo

      Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2019-10-16 05:17 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Barleeia tincta, shell, juvenile
    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2019-10-17 05:11 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Turbonilla insularis, shell
    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-17 05:09 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Smerinthus planus mounted specimen male ventral

      Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 04:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-17 05:10 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Church Notre-Dame de la Dalbade in Toulouse - Stained Glass of the Assumption

      Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-17 05:12 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ca' Rezzonico - Cappella di Zianigo San Girolamo Miani by Giandomenico Tiepolo
    Open for review.
     
    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2019-10-18 04:52 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Xerocrassa homeyeri, shell
    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-18 05:05 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Wooden container, Solomon Islands
    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-18 05:07 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Heraclitus by Giuseppe Torretti, Ca' Rezzonico (Venice) - Portego
    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-10-18 05:08 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Beaux-Arts de Carcassonne - L'Amour endormi auprès de Vénus - Nicolaas Verkolje
    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2019-10-18 08:21 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Château de Fitou, view from southwest
    •   Comment: I suggest cropping out the house on the left and also part of the foreground. Your image is the chateau, not the chateau and its environment. Martinvl (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    Open for review.
     
    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Martinvl (talk) on 2019-10-18 17:26 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Gateway to the Château de Pézenas
    Used in:
    fr:Pézenas
    Reason:
    The gateway is all that remains of this château. -- Martinvl (talk)
    Open for review.


    Pending valued image set candidatesEdit