Open main menu
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Oversighters and the translation is 48% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Oversighters and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:OV

Other languages:
Canadian English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Nederlands • ‎Türkçe • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎polski • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어

Ta strona wyjaśnia rolę rewizora na Wikimedia Commons.

  • If you need oversighter assistance on Commons, please email oversight-commons@lists.wikimedia.org with the diff links or page history link that should be suppressed and a clear explanation for such action. In an emergency, and if no Commons oversighter is immediately available, please contact a steward. Stewards should also be able to help if you need assistance with a cross-wiki problem .

Commons ma obecnie 4 rewizorów.

Oversighters as of lipiec 2019 [+/−]
Number of oversighters: 4

Contents

Kim jest rewizor?

Rewizorzy są to administratorzy z techniczną możliwością na Wikimedia Commons ukrywania danych, tak aby nie były widoczne przez zwykłych edytorów. Mogą oni ukrywać wersje stron lub plików, nazwy użytkowników w historii edycji i logach oraz fragmenty poszczególnych wpisów w logach.

Suppressed data remain permanently inaccessible through the wiki. Therefore, it cannot be accidentally restored when a page is deleted and undeleted. Suppressed data can be viewed and restored only by oversighters.

According to the global policy, suppression is approved in four cases:

  1. Removal of non-public personal information such as phone numbers, home addresses, workplaces or identities of pseudonymous or anonymous individuals who have not made their identity public, or of public individuals who have not made that personal information public.
  2. Removal of potentially libelous information either:
    a) on the advice of Wikimedia Foundation Legal Counsel or;
    b) when the case is clear and there is no editorial reason to keep the revision.
  3. Removal of copyright violations on the advice of Wikimedia Foundation counsel.
  4. Hiding of blatant attack names on automated lists and logs, where this does not disrupt edit histories. A blatant attack is one obviously intended to denigrate, threaten, libel, insult, or harass someone.

Meta policy on oversighters

Oversighters on Commons are bound by the meta oversight policy, the meta privacy policy and the WMF access to nonpublic data policy.

Jak mogę zostać rewizorem?

First, read Commons:Oversighters/Howto.

When you are ready, make your request using the box below, replacing Username with your own user name.



For greater visibility, all requests made here are transcluded onto the central Commons:Requests and votes page.

Głosowanie

Please note any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable if you give reasons both for   Support votes or   Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Wyczyść pamięć podręczną Użyj tego linku aby edytować transkludowaną stronę.

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.


Aktualni rewizorzy

Zobacz też