Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 03 2023

File:OutDoor_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A0525).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Jackets with Pertex membranes at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 23:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose it is looking blank --Modern primat 23:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
    •   Comment Thanks for the review. Please elaborate. Which section of COM:IG you are referring to? --MB-one 08:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Noisy and low detail, sorry. Not QI to me, even though I actually can see clothes in this blank picture.--Der Angemeldete 08:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta_-_March_2023_-_073.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Good Fortune Unicorn, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 03:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 05:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think the crop at the bottom is too tight here. --Augustgeyler 08:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support. As is often the case with mobile phone pictures, the image is a bit over-sharpened and the noise reduction is a bit too strong, which means it is a bit over-processed. But overall the result is still bearable. Nothing is cut off from the object, I don't understand the crop argument. This is QIC, not FPC. --Smial 10:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support As for the high resolution, the nice colours, the sufficient details the crop isn't very disturbing here.--Der Angemeldete 08:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 16:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

File:2023-01-27_Wintersport,_Rodeln,_51th_FIL_World_Championships-Oberhof_1DX_1636_by_Stepro.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Luge, 51th FIL World Championships Oberhof: Sigita Berzina (LAT). By --Stepro 18:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Bad cut of the helmet --Jmh2o 18:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Jakubhal 15:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Very good image. I think it makes a difference if we crop in at a human head discretely or on a helmet like here. So the tight crop might be OK with QI rules here, because the main object, the human, was not cropped inappropriately. --Augustgeyler 07:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --Smial 10:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Cropping the top part of the head is an accepted standard of portrait photography, even though we might not like it.--Peulle 06:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support What is up with that top head fetishism on young girls in sports? Is this really a thing? I've seen a lot of pictures like that before and faces are portrayed in a high quality way.--Der Angemeldete 08:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
    • @Der Angemeldete: accusations of fetishism are out of line, please stop with that. Mike Peel 19:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
      • @Mike Peel: I don't really think, someone can be accused of fetishism here (if this actually were some).--Der Angemeldete 12:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 16:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Hyundai_Ioniq_6_1X7A6900.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hyundai Ioniq 6 at Automesse Salzburg 2023.--Alexander-93 18:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Too many disturbing lights. --Jmh2o 18:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, and the light reflections are actually helpful in providing direction to the composition, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 18:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, the image is sharp, and is a really good attempt in this tricky situation, but the ghosts of the people in the background, plus the already-mentioned lights (and also reflections) mean that the composition hasn't worked well overall. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Mike Peel. I'm afraid of ghosts and they are quite disturbing here especially because the picture is sharp indeed.--Der Angemeldete 08:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_Mexico_-_March_2023_-_004.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Boy on the Seahorse (Zona Romántica), Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:43, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The image is rotated and lacks detail. --Augustgeyler 16:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
    • How is the image rotated? Water line on the horizon looks flat to me. -Another Believer 16:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
      •   Comment Sorry, you are right. The horizon is straight and the image is well oriented. But I am still not convinced with the level of detail. --Augustgeyler 10:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support The top of the statue is a bit close to being cropped, but the level of detail looks o.k. to me. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, lack of detail. It's a common issue with iPhone photographs, check the on-phone processing settings (possibly disable 'Smart HDR'). Thanks. Mike Peel 19:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient detail, rotated, looks overprocessed for this high resolution, wrong settings, as mentioned by Mike Peel.--Der Angemeldete 08:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)