Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 04 2021

Consensual review edit

File:2021_Dacia_Sandero_Stepway_Prestige_TCE_1.0_Front.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 2021 Dacia Sandero Stepway Prestige TCE 1.0 Front Taken in Leamington Spa --Vauxford 17:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Unortunate composition with all those cars in the background. --Zinnmann 11:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
      Support Very good quality, the background - not that disturbing - isn't enough to decline. --Selbymay 13:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. The background does not interfere, the car was filmed on the street, not in the studio. --Knopik-som 05:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Tussen_Slijk-Ewijk_en_Andelst,_de_Waal_vanaf_de_Waaldijk_aan_het_eind_van_hoog_water_IMG_9905_2021-07-22_19.47.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination between Slijk-Ewijk and Andelst NL, view from the Waaldijk at the end of the high water --Michielverbeek 21:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry! Too low sharpness. --Steindy 23:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
    IMO center and ship in background sharp enough, left part is indeed less sharper, but that is not the main part --Michielverbeek 06:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough to be printed to A4 size or larger. Nice composition and very nice lighting. -- Smial 11:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial. --Zinnmann 12:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me.--Famberhorst 15:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK. --XRay 05:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Klonk_silurian-devonian_TK_2021-07-23_1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination International silurian-devonian stratotype, Klonk u Suchomast, Czechia --Nefronus 20:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry! The rocks aren't sharp. --Steindy 23:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks for the review. I think they are suitably sharp for such resolution, the exposition and the lighting conditions were adequate. This photo gives an overall view of the geological profile, more detailed rocks/layers are visible on the other one. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 00:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough to be printed to A4 or larger. A bit oversharpened, but not really disturbing. --Smial 16:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose More perspective correction --Commonists 16:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question What about perspective correction? --Nefronus 18:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)