Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 06 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Päijänne_sunset.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sunset in Päijänne, Asikkala. --Kallerna 19:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Sorry! Looks like a painting, but the background is too unsharp for me. --Steindy 22:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
      Support I'd allow it. I don't think pinpoint sharpness is needed in a view of a sunset over a lake of substantial length. -- Ikan Kekek 00:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
      Support I really like the focus on the lower part of the water. The reduced DoF supports the tranquility of the scene. Very well done! --Zinnmann 09:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support To my taste, the photo is a little too bright, but the choice of aperture and thus the depth of field is clearly intended. And well chosen. --Smial 14:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Pestana_Porto_Hotel_in_Porto_(2).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Pestana Porto Hotel at Praça da Ribeira in Porto, Portugal. --Tournasol7 05:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support The left side tilts to the left and the right to the right (see e.g. the lamppost). Could the perspective be improved? --Nefronus 07:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment All lines of the buildings at stright, so the lamppost are tilted in reality. --Tournasol7 12:34, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
*   Support removed unsigned vote --Smial 12:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Nefronus. --Fischer.H 13:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Perspective is ok here. --Sebring12Hrs 18:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment You are right, I change my vote.
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)