Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 16 2021

Consensual review edit

File:Schlossskirche_P1290576.jpg edit

 

File:Neunkirchen_am_Brand_Kirche_Fresco-20210411-RM-160944.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Holy water font in the Catholic Church of St. Michael in Neunkirchen am Brand around 1520 --Ermell 10:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Moroder 17:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
      Oppose This motiv is really hard to take a good picture of. It's not really sharp, out of focus or maybe to high ISO number. There are also some RGB spots which maybe is from the sensor of the camera. --Goran tek-en 19:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharp at 70%. -- Ikan Kekek 21:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Found one green, one red, one blue hot pixel artifact. If repaired, I'll change to "pro". The depicted fresco has rather low contrast. Such images appear often less sharp than images with high contrast. But this is sharp enough, regarding the resolution. --Smial 12:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  Support after rework. Thx. --Smial 13:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good for me --Commonists 19:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Images with obvious, easily fixable, purely technical errors cannot become QI, in my humble opinion. I have added notes to the image and hope @Ermell: eliminates these shortcomings. --Smial 10:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Smial. --Nefronus 20:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support I see 4 hot pixels. They are easy to repair. Therefore no reason to decline. --Steindy 22:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment @Smial: @Nefronus: @Goran tek-en: Sorry, a bit late but I could find three and fixed them. Thanks for the reviews.--Ermell 08:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted George Chernilevsky 20:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)