Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 26 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Aglais urticae above Lai Grond, Surses, Switzerland 3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aglais urticae photographed in the mountains of Switzerland --Capricorn4049 19:00, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose IMO the main subject (the butterflies) isn't sharp enough. BTW, the image is tilted. However, the idea for the image composition is quite good. --Basotxerri 10:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me. --Yann 08:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basotxerry, please compare with the image below ;-) --Moroder 06:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basotxerri. Really good composition, but not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --PumpkinSky 13:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Former Consular Palace 04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Former Consular Palace in Pézenas, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 14:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Top part of the building is unsharp maybe overprocessed --Cvmontuy 16:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support The top left side loses sharpness, but the building is sharp enough, more opinions please. --C messier 12:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose While the top of the building is warped, that alone might not have been enough to stop me from supporting. However, I also find that car on the left to be a bit disturbing. The two things together are enough for me to oppose this one.--Peulle 08:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Milseburg 11:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Crimson-marsh-glider-head.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Crimson marsh glider, head shot --Deepugn 02:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not a QI for me. Please discuss --Vengolis 15:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - It's a QI because of the great detail in the head. If it's necessary to satisfy everyone that the subject was depicted adequately, Deepugn could rename the file "Crimson-marsh-glider-head (etc.)". -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not QI for me. Charlesjsharp 20:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not QI for me too...sorry --Livioandronico2013 11:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I think this is a QI --Rabax63 16:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann 08:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I've looked at this a couple of times now and ending up on the supporting side. Not an FP, but good enough for QI, methinks.--Peulle 08:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Very detailed shot of the head. Guanaco 00:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 11:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)