Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 10 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Basingstoke - FGW 150001 arriving from Reading.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination First Great Western Class 150 under threatening clouds --Geof Sheppard 13:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Tilted cw. Red fringes. Chromatic noise in the sky. Also, please provide a higher resolution. We do not encourage button size images of easy to take motifs. --Cccefalon 13:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA, tilted, rather unsharp regarding the low resolution. --Smial 10:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 10:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Palacio_de_Justicia,_Plaza_Republicana,_Puno,_Perú,_2015-08-01,_DD_52.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Justice Palace, Plaza Republicana, Puno, Peru --Poco a poco 08:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Perspective... --Pudelek 16:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
      Comment I opted for this perspective on purpose. MUST I correct it everywhere? --Poco a poco 05:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support IMO the image does not become better if the perspective will be corrected. It's OK. --XRay 07:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Will not get better from that point of view without looking strange. QI for me.--Ermell 08:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 10:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Hesselbach (Mai 2015).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Nature of Hesselbach, NRW, Germany. Alkab 21:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Disturbing branches and shadow at the left, CAs. Sharpness could be better too. May be you can improve your image. You may try it. --XRay 17:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree. It´s worth to discuss. Branches and shadow arn´t disturbing for me. In full resolution almost all images here are lacking of perfect sharpness.. --Milseburg 16:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes or no, Milseburg? --Hubertl 05:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I say yes to this image. --Milseburg 11:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor composition (shadow and foreground on the left), overall unsharp. Alvesgaspar 19:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 23:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Cas and lack of sharpness. Poor compo.--Ermell 08:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 10:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Paseo_Dársena,_La_Coruña,_España,_2015-09-24,_DD_33-35_PAN.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Dársena Avenue, La Coruña, Spain --Poco a poco 18:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good sharpness but the sky is unnaturally darkblue (polarization effect?). Can you make it more natural? Only outermost right part of the image is on the street curve, that means whole image has heavy barrel distortion. --Iifar 08:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've reworked the sky a bit, cropped the right part for a better balancing and cloned out a tree branch. Regarding the perspective I'd like to add that this picture is a panorama merged of 3 frames and I opted for a cylindrical panorama Poco a poco 17:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Support also because this mode of stitching has been declined on my candidate on QIC very recently --Moroder 00:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Moroder ! Unnatural distortion--Jebulon 18:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium69 14:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support For me a receivable way to present this subjekt. --Milseburg 19:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough, although the whites are a bit overexposed. Alvesgaspar 19:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I would support it - especially because of the cylindrical presentation of the panorama, but please correct the multiple stitching errors. I left annotations. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As Ccefalon. Errors should be fixed.--Ermell 08:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Will upload a new version in a few days Poco a poco 22:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 10:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)