Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 11 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Bengal_-_20150614_17h14_(10310).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Young bengal three years. -- Medium69 01:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Thibaut120094 02:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, not sharp enough. --Rolf H. 05:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice composition. Sharp enough IMO. The DOF is little on purpose IMO--Lmbuga 14:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support It would be better with the nose focused though. -- Alvesgaspar 19:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'm agree with you Alvesgaspar, thanks--Lmbuga 20:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Cooper_October_2015_6_(Big_Jon's_Burgers).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Big Jon's Burgers in Cooper, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 19:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality --Jean11 21:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, perspective problem. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Jacek. --Medium69 16:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Not a perspective problem but a slight clockwise tilt, which can be corrected. Alvesgaspar 19:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 19:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Исторический музей .jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Государственный исторический музей. Вид со стороны манежной площади --WM wm WM 16:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • {{s}}Good quality. --Hubertl 17:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
      Comment You are right Halavar, my fault. Hope, this User can change it, the motif is great --Hubertl 08:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I do not agree. Lots of noise. Building is leaning inward. Image should be in the proper category. --Halavar 21:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As above. Alvesgaspar 19:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 19:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Migyass_16.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Des bijoux tunisiens --IssamBarhoumi 13:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Medium69 14:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Je trouve que la netteté n'est pas suffisante, je souhaite d'autres avis svp. Not sharp enough, I wish other opinions please.--Jebulon 15:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Jebulon. Also this user is probably too stupid to understand the rules. He is nominating this file every day. I declined the number three of same nomination today. --Cccefalon 10:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Cccefalon: This is not a reason to describe him as stupid !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Touzrimounir (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment I said, "Too stupid to understand the rules". However, how would you describe his behaviour? --Cccefalon 18:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  Comment @Cccefalon: he is honest, he thought that the photo was deleted, He call me today and ask me Why you said he is Stupid I think he will not upload photos from Tunisia again, because of your behaviour we will lose all photographers from Tunisia I am asking you again to be more polite with him thank you --Touzrimounir 18:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
That is hilarious (because of your behaviour we will lose all photographers from Tunisia). What about teaching them, to read the image guidelines and the QIC rules before nominating? --Cccefalon 18:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
@Cccefalon: Don't worry, I have organized two training courses about QI and and I speak with them, and I ask you before to help me, I want to increase the number of users from Tunisia --Touzrimounir 18:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
@Touzrimounir: You are welcome for that ! Nous accueillons volontiers tous les nouveaux contributeurs, particulièrement de Tunisie ! Venez et participez ! Il s'agit juste de bien comprendre les règles du jeu et de les respecter. Et toutes les questions sont les bienvenues, même sur ma page de discussion si besoin. Pardon d'écrire en français, je ne connais pas l'arabe.--Jebulon 23:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
  CommentTry to translate (محاولة ترجمة):

انكم مدعوون لذلك! ونحن نرحب بكل مساهمة جديدة، وخاصة من تونس! وتأتي مشاركة! هذا هو فقط لفهم القواعد واحترامها. وجميع المسائل هي موضع ترحيب، وحتى على صفحة نقاشي إذا لزم الأمر. إسمح لي أن أكتب باللغة الفرنسية، وأنا لا أعرف العربية --Jean11 (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 16:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Hubertl: There are 2 supports don't forget that medium 69 supported first the image with his comment Good quality--El Golli Mohamed 19:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you, El Golli Mohamed, it was my inattention. --Hubertl 12:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Sharp enough, I can see all letters on that ring, but somewhat high colour saturation. Lighting is very soft, perhaps a cloudy sky? Then colours shouldn't be as intense. -- Smial 12:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Ps.: Mir kommen die Farben (Hautton, Hintergrund, "Gold") für das flache Licht und den niedrigen Gesamtkontrast zu bunt vor, so als hätte jemand bei einem sehr weichen Foto nur am Regler "Farbkontrast" gezerrt. Kann mich aber auch irren.
  • Sorry   Oppose not sharp enough, photographing again with manual focus and possible with tripod. (not recognize all the letters, but if I have the ring already) --Jean11 17:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Out of focus. Alvesgaspar 19:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good picture but not sharp enough.--Ermell 23:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 22:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Wajoc_Dzor,_Krajobrazy_widziane_z_drogi_M2,_widoki_okolic_Jeghegnadzor_(01).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Landscapes seen from the road M2 - views of the surrounding areas. Yeghegnadzor, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. --Halavar 13:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Noise --Daniel Case 03:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I think, there is no noise. Its hazy, but this is normal for a panorama like this --Hubertl 10:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Noisy. --Medium69 16:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As above. Alvesgaspar 19:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 19:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Zalophus_californianus_(Otarie_de_Californie)_-_414.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Zalophus californianus (California sea lion)the sea lion show in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 01:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Very weak   Support The resolution should be better. A closer crop would be nice. --XRay 07:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not QI, not good focus, DoF. Charlesjsharp 11:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Your comment has no value to me because it's a revenge... --Medium69 01:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Clément Bardot 15:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overprocessed, weak sharpness. -- Smial 14:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sharp enough for me. But the composition is not balanced. Maybe with more space on the left? -- Alvesgaspar 19:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 19:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)