Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 19 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:Kromeriz 06.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Kroměříž Main Square West View --Scotch Mist 11:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose too dark for me --Pudelek 13:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree, IMO picture is OK --Jacek Halicki 13:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Can't see that it's too dark. --Palauenc05 15:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 14:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Юго-восточная_четырехугольная_башня.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The Southeastern Quadrangular Tower, Tobolsk Kremlin. The tower is actually leaning. --Óðinn 01:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 08:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted --Uoaei1 09:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
    It is not tilted; the horizon is perfectly horizontal. --Óðinn 05:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 00:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 08:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Nèfle_au_marché_de_la_casbah_d'Alger.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Loquat in the market of the casbah of Algiers --Vikoula5 15:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support ok for qi --Martin Kraft 18:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree - there is nothing sharp in full resolution. --Cccefalon 07:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too unsharp. --Jean11 21:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 08:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Babouche.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Babouche --IssamBarhoumi 13:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: The image is not sharp. --Cccefalon 12:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry. DoF too small. Too much noise. --XRay 08:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 08:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Zalophus_californianus_(Otarie_de_Californie)_-_459.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Zalophus californianus (California sea lion)the sea lion show in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 10:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Good shot, both in ternms of technical and composition. I don't like the lighting at all, though. Let's find a consensus here. --Hendric Stattmann 13:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The bottom of the animal isn't sharp and too bright --Ezarate 11:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Yes or no, Hendric Stattmann?? Otherwise, why do you sent it then to CR? --Hubertl 10:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 13:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Just good enough for QI. --Hendric Stattmann 15:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 14:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File:PlayadePiedraantesdeVarese-dic2015.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Beach of stone near Varese Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   CommentInitial version was blurred, dramatically underexposed. --Hendric Stattmann 13:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  • I disagree.   Support It´s worth to discuss. --Milseburg 14:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment OK, it's fine to discuss it here. Wouldn’t you agree that bumping the exposure up by at least 2/3rds of a stop would improve the picture a lot? Apart from that, the picture is certainly a QI. --Hendric Stattmann 15:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Look now please, thanks!!! --Ezarate 21:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 04:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)